Oct 24th: Did you know that as of this news update, 30.8k posts have been uploaded by 5.2k verified artists? Read our Artist Verification page to learn how to get faster approvals and a verified checkmark on your posts.
Adobe Flash has reached end of life, and no longer works in browsers. Please see this thread on the forum for details on how you can continue to play this file.
Keyboard shortcuts are disabled on this page because it contains flash.
Viewing sample resized to 83% of original (view original)Loading...
Ligeron said: The gender ratio for Popplio should have been reversed. Selkies, the inspiration for Primarina, are generally female with males being rare.
Somebody apparently has a hardon for starter gender ratios, lemme upvote you to get rid of that red.
I definitely agree. Popplio and Chikorita should have been reversed.
Ligeron said: The gender ratio for Popplio should have been reversed. Selkies, the inspiration for Primarina, are generally female with males being rare.
The only real reason it's like that is to make starters less easy to breed efficiently. Granted, there are ways to get around that, but still.
Furrin_Gok said: Gender ratios on starters make no sense.
Ligeron said: The gender ratio for Popplio should have been reversed. Selkies, the inspiration for Primarina, are generally female with males being rare.
FiestaDeGuerra said: The only real reason it's like that is to make starters less easy to breed efficiently. Granted, there are ways to get around that, but still.
There is an in-universe explanation for why the starters have this ratio.
The starter pokemon basically don't exist in the wild. Only in rare situations have you ever been able to catch ANY of the starter pokemon.
Why? Because in-universe, they are rare. Why are they rare? Because of the gender ratio and because Pokemon reproduce according to the species of the female.
If you had a group of Pidgy that were all male and a group of the same number of zubat that were all female and they reproduced, ALL the offspring would be zubat.
And if the gender ratio is as skewed as 87.5% male to 12.5% female, yeah, they aren't gonna be common. The males can reproduce with whatever is in their egg group, but the product will be a female of whatever they mated with, not the rare starter pokemon. (ditto is the only exception to this rule).
At the end of the day, like whichever gender you want, but the ratio does provide an explanation of why the starter pokemon are so rare.
Daneasaur said: There is an in-universe explanation for why the starters have this ratio.
The starter pokemon basically don't exist in the wild. Only in rare situations have you ever been able to catch ANY of the starter pokemon.
Why? Because in-universe, they are rare. Why are they rare? Because of the gender ratio and because Pokemon reproduce according to the species of the female.
If you had a group of Pidgy that were all male and a group of the same number of zubat that were all female and they reproduced, ALL the offspring would be zubat.
And if the gender ratio is as skewed as 87.5% male to 12.5% female, yeah, they aren't gonna be common. The males can reproduce with whatever is in their egg group, but the product will be a female of whatever they mated with, not the rare starter pokemon. (ditto is the only exception to this rule).
At the end of the day, like whichever gender you want, but the ratio does provide an explanation of why the starter pokemon are so rare.
We don't need a reason, though. If you really want to give one, say Team Bad Guys have been kidnapping them, and after the main story, by which point you can easily get a ditto anyways, they could then appear.
Ligeron said: The gender ratio for Popplio should have been reversed. Selkies, the inspiration for Primarina, are generally female with males being rare.
No. Their genderratio will forever be 87% male and 12% female. No matter how feminine they or/and their evolution look. Even though that's how the gender ratio works, this site doesn't give a single shit about it and draws them of how they look like.
You must be over the age of 18 and agree
to the terms of service to access this page.
By default a limited blacklist has been applied hiding content that is commonly objected to. You may remove
items from this blacklist by using the blacklist menu item.
ElectroTiger
Member"Am I too... MANLY for you, sweetie?"
Coalsack
MemberNo you're...perfect
Nazgul
Memberooooh eheheheh
Daneasaur
MemberI ain't gay, but I'd kiss that.
GameManiac
BlockedWhat does he sing? Heavy metal?
HypnoBitch
MemberO.O he's a god of the sea.
user 80770
MemberManly AF
Furrin Gok
MemberGender ratios on starters make no sense.
Duracell
MemberFabio returns.
Ligeron
MemberThe gender ratio for Popplio should have been reversed. Selkies, the inspiration for Primarina, are generally female with males being rare.
ShadowWar11
MemberOh! If he were to sing metal or rock, that would definitely be the Pokémon for me! XD
Furrin Gok
MemberSomebody apparently has a hardon for starter gender ratios, lemme upvote you to get rid of that red.
I definitely agree. Popplio and Chikorita should have been reversed.
Coalsack
MemberI'll still pick their male forms, no matter how much resets it'd take. They're prettier as guys, well, at least for me.
Furrin Gok
MemberPrimarina look the same regardless of gender. Meganiums barely have a difference, but I could understand prefering it one way more than the other.
BitFly
MemberThe only real reason it's like that is to make starters less easy to breed efficiently. Granted, there are ways to get around that, but still.
user 144912
MemberXD When searched "Primarina Male" I wasn't expecting this, honestly, But it made my day nonetheless.
Daneasaur
MemberThere is an in-universe explanation for why the starters have this ratio.
The starter pokemon basically don't exist in the wild. Only in rare situations have you ever been able to catch ANY of the starter pokemon.
Why? Because in-universe, they are rare. Why are they rare? Because of the gender ratio and because Pokemon reproduce according to the species of the female.
If you had a group of Pidgy that were all male and a group of the same number of zubat that were all female and they reproduced, ALL the offspring would be zubat.
And if the gender ratio is as skewed as 87.5% male to 12.5% female, yeah, they aren't gonna be common. The males can reproduce with whatever is in their egg group, but the product will be a female of whatever they mated with, not the rare starter pokemon. (ditto is the only exception to this rule).
At the end of the day, like whichever gender you want, but the ratio does provide an explanation of why the starter pokemon are so rare.
Furrin Gok
MemberWe don't need a reason, though. If you really want to give one, say Team Bad Guys have been kidnapping them, and after the main story, by which point you can easily get a ditto anyways, they could then appear.
Furrin Gok
MemberTo clarify, I'm saying you can just make them not appear in the wild at all and I'd be fine with it.
Snowcone23
MemberNo. Their genderratio will forever be 87% male and 12% female. No matter how feminine they or/and their evolution look. Even though that's how the gender ratio works, this site doesn't give a single shit about it and draws them of how they look like.
Yeelon
MemberWunderbar
user 147976
MemberHe can still sing opera
GameManiac
BlockedEstuans interius
ira vehementi
Estuans interius
ira vehementi
Sephiroth
Sephiroth
Login to respond »