fabinella created by lady snakebite
Description

A Handy Guide To Internal Shots - by LadySnakebite

Blacklisted
  • Comments
  • Wait...

    I'm not supposed to be screaming with my legs crossed while looking at porn?

    News to me...

  • Reply
  • |
  • 611
  • People know this. They don't care, unfortunately. It's been a fetish in and of itself. THE CERVICAL PENETRATION TRAIN HAS NO BRAKES.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 343
  • I'm excited for her next PSA: "Did you know that anthropomorphic animals don't actually exist...?"

  • Reply
  • |
  • 198
  • This is great.

    Though -as I understand it- cervical penetration is pretty normal for real horses.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 34
  • faolan said:
    I'm excited for her next PSA: "Did you know that anthropomorphic animals don't actually exist...?"

    Did you know that this applies to humans too?

  • Reply
  • |
  • 38
  • It's an okay lesson for those who don't understand the subject, but it really doesn't apply in the slightest when cervical penetration is deliberate and intentional.

    Not realistic? Yeah, well, that's furry logic. Deal with it. :3

  • Reply
  • |
  • 53
  • Yeah, I agree. It would be hard to go off at that stuff if you were a female. BUT, I believe there's a tag for it that can be blacklisted.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 10
  • Omnicidal said:
    Did you know that this applies to humans too?

    Humans don't exist either?
    Well fuck, I think I need to up my medication dosage then. I've been seeing those fuckers everywhere.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 116
  • faolan said:
    I'm excited for her next PSA: "Did you know that anthropomorphic animals don't actually exist...?"

    TheGrimReaver said:
    Humans don't exist either?
    Well fuck, I think I need to up my medication dosage then. I've been seeing those fuckers everywhere.

    Maybe it is a mass hallucination? I see humans everywhere too! D:

  • Reply
  • |
  • 22
  • MrZoat said:
    This is great.

    Though -as I understand it- cervical penetration is pretty normal for real horses.

    Hes right you know.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 4
  • You shouldn't throw rocks while sitting in a glass house.
    Besides, as someone said before, but I'm not actually sure about Horses, but I know that pigs do it, but your whole point is invalid, because it is FICTIONAL. Do you know what that word means? There is a blacklist feature, you don't have to look at it and crap-talking other people's fetishes makes you look like a douchebag.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 20
  • ...I mean cervical penetration is impossible but what I really hate is, "I don't like my cervix getting touched, SO YOU DON'T EITHER."

    No, no that's not true. There are plenty of women who enjoy getting the very depths of their sexes pounded. Comics like this like to pretend they don't exist but it's true. Hell, plenty of guys (myself included) like getting their balls stuck, but this comic likes to pretend no man likes testicular pain.

    News flash!

    It's cool to be informative, but it's not cool to pretend things don't exist, and it's not cool to get screamy about it.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 51
  • >tries to lecture furries about internal organs

    Lackwit said:
    There are plenty of women who enjoy getting the very depths of their sexes pounded.

    See, if the artist was half as smart as she pretends to be, she'd know that the ANTERIOR FORNIX is in fact probably the most sensitive of erogenous zones us women have, and would've at least mentioned it.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 19
  • Nalyah said:
    >tries to lecture furries about internal organs

    See, if the artist was half as smart as she pretends to be, she'd know that the ANTERIOR FORNIX is in fact probably the most sensitive of erogenous zones us women have, and would've at least mentioned it.

    Frankly? It's just something this artist appears to DO. She has three whole comics saying the same thing about "How not to make creepy comments."

    People who take time out of their day to try and instruct them how to be are some of the most insufferable people on the web, because no matter what, they are smarter than you and can NOT be wrong.

    Least, so they think.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 15
  • To be fair, like most of the porn I enjoy on this site, I would never attempt it in real life lol.

    Cervical penetration scratches that "big male, small female, deep penetration" itch for a lot of people here, I'd imagine. I like to think most of them understand that drawn/animated porn, particularly of the furry variety, plays pretty fast and loose with the rules of biology/physics. I doubt, for instance, anyone who faps to vore porn is actually interested in swallowing a human being whole in real life.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 21
  • I would almost not have a problem with this, but the opening of the cervix depicted is WAY too wide. The actual opening is supposedly about 0.2mm wide and could never be ejaculated through. Only about 100 sperm cells at most make it through the opening and the rest just pools in front of it.

    That and I get the feeling that it is not painful for most women to merely touch the cervix, especially considering the areas around it are highly erogenous zones.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 1
  • EightyNine said:
    ITT : People legitimately insulted because an artist reminded them how anatomy works

    Stay classy.

    Nah, that ain't what it's about.

    It's about how somebody thinks it so important that they need to quite literally scream at them all the ways they're wrong, talking down to the audience the whole time.

    It's like Bill Nye Saves The World.

    Nobody likes when people do that shit.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • Lackwit said:
    Nah, that ain't what it's about.

    It's about how somebody thinks it so important that they need to quite literally scream at them all the ways they're wrong, talking down to the audience the whole time.

    It's like Bill Nye Saves The World.

    Nobody likes when people do that shit.

    Let's be completely honest here; look at the target audience.

    Some of them need to be talked down to.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 7
  • Alright... time for the biologist/hobby anatomist to step up and tell you what for, artist.

    You're wrong on the majority of your points.
    Here's why.

    The cervix is a rigid structure that doesn't like being pried at *IN HUMANS*. Even then, many human females are pleasured by having the cervix and surrounding area stimulated. So that's one point for you, one against.

    Once you leave human anatomy behind, however, suddenly cervical penetration is practically the norm. The noble houses of Cervidae, Canidae, Equidae, Bovidae, Suidae, Tapiridae, some rodent families, and a large portion of reptiles in general, just as easy examples, have cervical penetration or ejaculation as a literal reproductive trait, and males that cannot penetrate or ejaculate through the cervix typically don't sire any young. Part two of reality refuting your point.

    Not sure if you've noticed, but the vast majority of furs depict themselves with, at the very least, traits of these animals, making pseudo-reality refute your main point as well.

    Further, as many others have pointed out, this is fiction, rules that would normally apply need not, so the nature of your own medium refutes your point by default.

    Understand a bit more now? You're point is in stark contrast with reality, smart fiction (pseudoreality, which most aim for), and raw fiction just says no out of spite.

    I must say no. Bad rabbit, sit in the corner and think about what you've done.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 60
  • EightyNine said:
    Let's be completely honest here; look at the target audience.

    Some of them need to be talked down to.

    Nah dude eat waste. That's a shitty way to look at it. Nobody needs to be talked down to like they're a child.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 4
  • Lackwit said:
    Nah dude eat waste. That's a shitty way to look at it. Nobody needs to be talked down to like they're a child.

    Let's not default to blissful naivetรฉ.
    Whether you like it or not, there are people who are too stupid to understand or apply things properly, whether by willful ignorance or lack of mental faculty.

  • Reply
  • |
  • -8
  • Wrapping this since it got a bit lengthy...

    Qwazzy said:
    It's an okay lesson for those who don't understand the subject, but it really doesn't apply in the slightest when cervical penetration is deliberate and intentional.

    Not realistic? Yeah, well, that's furry logic. Deal with it. :3

    Moonlit_Wolf said:
    To be fair, like most of the porn I enjoy on this site, I would never attempt it in real life lol.

    Cervical penetration scratches that "big male, small female, deep penetration" itch for a lot of people here, I'd imagine. I like to think most of them understand that drawn/animated porn, particularly of the furry variety, plays pretty fast and loose with the rules of biology/physics. I doubt, for instance, anyone who faps to vore porn is actually interested in swallowing a human being whole in real life.

    That's sort of my stand on the whole thing. The only time I really have a problem with cervical penetration in art is when it tries to make an attempt at being serious and accurate with respect to anthro and then throws that out the window by doing full on cervical penetration as if it was completely normal and absolutely wonderful for the bottom.

    Also, the problem is sometimes not actually about separating fantasy from reality, but that people don't even known how reality is supposed to work in the first place; cervical penetrations are practically impossible among real humans and very probably always painful.

    Koltira said:
    1. I dont see art where female ovaries someone crush, so you compare ablsolutely difference things.
    2. Here and especcial on fa a THOUSANDS of male genital mutilation arts like castration, penectomy etc and almoust no female genital mutilation.
    3. In 1 your comics ageinst you normalize and justified genital mutilation toward males.
    4. You draw comics about "big problems of not right sex toward females that can be hurt" but not draw nothing ageinst thousands of misandric arts who propogue violence and especcial genital violence ageinst males ones.
    So you are just gynocentric cunt, who want more and better social priviliges, even on fake world...

    Woah, that's a lot assumptions about someone drawn from a single image. An image which doesn't even focus on what you're arguing about. Nice job there on pushing that last insult, it always adds weight and validity to your points.

    1. I'm pretty the artist was not being literal about cervix = testicles, it was probably more of an attempt to get the point across to the male audience.
    2. CBT and male genital mutilation isn't something only women enjoy, plenty of males do that too, I'd not be surprised if the majority of commissioners are actually male.
    3. The artist isn't trying to force other artists to stop drawing this stuff, if they were then drawing it in the first place would be stupid. This has nothing to do with sexism.
    4. Being against misogyny does not makes one a misandrist. Drawing art of misandry does not make one a misandrist. Misandry requires involving real people.

    WolvenEdge said:
    The cervix is a rigid structure that doesn't like being pried at *IN HUMANS*. Even then, many human females are pleasured by having the cervix and surrounding area stimulated. So that's one point for you, one against.
    [...]
    Not sure if you've noticed, but the vast majority of furs depict themselves with, at the very least, traits of these animals, making pseudo-reality refute your main point as well.

    Further, as many others have pointed out, this is fiction, rules that would normally apply need not, so the nature of your own medium refutes your point by default.

    Most anthros often take on very humanlike anatomy and especially genital anatomy and almost exclusively so among females, even in internal shots, hence the comparison is quite apt. The only thing different between a human and an anthro is often only external, i.e. head/face, fur/skin, feet and claws.

    Additionally there are plenty more females who do not enjoy cervical stimulation than who do (not saying there aren't plenty of those who do but they are still a minority). Even more so the artist didn't really mention much about cervical stimulation but were focusing on cervical penetration, two completely different things.

    It's mostly just a PSA intended for those who don't know better and thinks that deeper is always better. It's really not intended as kinkshaming, despite maybe coming off slightly as that towards the end.

    Also, I dunno if you really need to be condescending without even talking to the artist or visiting the source, but maybe just me being overly sensitive.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 8
  • No, we don't need to talk. It's a fetish so deal with it and blacklist cervical_penetration and move on :/

  • Reply
  • |
  • 9
  • I'm pretty sure there are some girls out there that do like getting cervicly penetrated, like there are some guys out there that like getting their balls stomped on.
    I personally have no idea why, and I imagine there would be serious injuries involved (since I'm a guy, testicular torsion is the first thing that comes to mind), but w/e gets you off.
    After looking up cervix penetration (and cervix penetration tumblr), apparently some women sound their cervix... Oh boy, more sounding fetishes to kinkshame!.
    Summation: No two women are born identical. Some like it, some don't. Not your place to say that all women don't like something.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 6
  • Oh yay, it's one of those "ALL WIMMENS ARE EXACTLY THE SAME AND LIKE THE EXACT SAME THINGS AND THIS ISN'T ONE OF THEM SO YOU CAN'T LIKE IT"

    I bet you call yourself a feminist, but who's the one putting women in restrictive boxes here?

    Everything else has already been said, you know why you're wrong, a moment's thought could have led you to that had you applied it before you drew the image. Think with your mind, not your feels.

  • Reply
  • |
  • -7
  • Thank you. The comments section here proves this is needed. People actually trying to use a few outliers as proof that it actually feels good shows that this isn't a fetish situation, it's an education one. If this is your fetish that this is not aimed at you.
    By the logic in the comments here I could argue urethral penetration is normal and pleasurable. But let's not get that stupid okay guys. The fact is that if we care about realism, then people need to stop make cervical penetration the default. And we *do* care about realism. Until it comes to fetishes, where realism needs to take a backseat sometimes.

  • Reply
  • |
  • -4
  • Minus said:
    By the logic in the comments here I could argue urethral penetration is normal and pleasurable. But let's not get that stupid okay guys. The fact is that if we care about realism, then people need to stop make cervical penetration the default. And we *do* care about realism. Until it comes to fetishes, where realism needs to take a backseat sometimes.

    Wait, it doesn't feel pleasurable or normal for you?

  • Reply
  • |
  • 4
  • CCoyote said:
    This is why e621 is not the place for intelligent conversation.

    Or, you know, maybe not the place for bitching about realism in porn.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 5
  • I think those who draw know this, atleast I do when I draw that. But since its just a drawing, its like showing off the lenght, its more of the thought that counts not the anatomy...Atleast thats the way I think

  • Reply
  • |
  • 1
  • Same case as almost every Interwebs Anonymous places: it's kinda hard to know how many real women are lurking and posting here, and this post make the issue interesting and relevant.

    While it is just logic cervical penetration must be painful (not my right to say, I'm male), there is this part behind cervix called posterior fornix wich gives strong pleasure when get reached. Not an expert, neither Cassanova here, just had the luck once and not for so long.

    Here is where the issue is relevant: ยฟcan any GIRL confirm this?

  • Reply
  • |
  • 1
  • While I understand the intent to teach people about something that they may not have known before, I can't say I like the tone of the comic. That last panel in particular... There's supposed to be a disclaimer saying something along the lines of "only applies if you're trying to make realistic art based on certain reproductive systems" right? Otherwise I half expect the next PSA from this artist to be something along the lines of "Don't draw vore, people die if they get eaten, and that's not sexy!" Maybe not for you, but for a lot of people...

    Sure, you don't find a certain thing sexy and you're worried about the usual issue of porn normalising unrealistic expectation, I assume? No problem with that. But when you're telling people what they should and should not draw, with no regard for personal preference, people are going to react defensively.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 7
  • I've seen this crop up in a couple places outside of furry sites as some sort of "haha gotcha" against porn depicting cervical penetration. It's honestly super obnoxious, like people just can't let people have their unrealistic kinks (which they know are unrealistic) without getting this sort of sanctimonious lecturing? That goes even more for the artist, as someone who draws furry porn of all things, she should be able to wrap her mind around the concept of people getting off to stuff that wouldn't be possible in reality. If it makes someone "cross their legs screaming" then they should just not look at it--not all porn needs to appeal to all people.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 10
  • EightyNine said:
    If your primary argument is trying to rebuke the artist because furfags are absolutely offended by someone explaining how a woman's junk works, perhaps you don't need to be throwing around terms like 'sanctimonious.'

    Heaven only knows they need the lesson, since a majority of these lot will never see one up close.

    I think the issue was less about telling people how female genitalia works, and more with the closing statement that basically amounts to "just don't draw this ever" with no thought for specific fetishes. I mean hanzai does clarify that they're talking about cases where people already realise the unrealistic kink is unrealistic.

    The post itself does read less like an attempt to educate, and more like a crusade against something the artist doesn't personally like. May well be that the thing springs from a lack of knowledge, but the tone works against it.

    Speaking of, the same can be said against your post. The insults really do nothing but weaken an argument, regardless of how valid said argument might be.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 11
  • DoesNotExist said:
    Speaking of, the same can be said against your post. The insults really do nothing but weaken an argument, regardless of how valid said argument might be.

    Explaining something becomes tiresome after the fifteen or sixteenth trillionth time, give or take.

    Do note it's not an argument. It's a statement of fact.

  • Reply
  • |
  • -7
  • Bruh. Cervical penetration is known to happen in nature. Dogs...horses. Comeon. Is it wrong to assume that anthropomorphic canines and stuff with uh...the hardware their own individual species have, would still do the same thing?

  • Reply
  • |
  • 3
  • Aren't the ovaries the testicle equivalent?
    Not sure why people equate separate things to each other.
    Cervix would need to expand and contract one way or another at some point btw

  • Reply
  • |
  • -2
  • This is generally accurate, except for fetishes like my ex-fuckbuddy's.
    She wasn't really a masochist because she didn't like general pain, but the only way to make her cum was lay on her back, take a huge dildo (10"+) push it in deep to her cervix, and kick it deeper. She came like crazy every time and said it was amazing. She liked how sudden it was and how she felt everything stretch differently. The only time she ever complained was when we used a L Flared Chance, cause the tip was too flat and it didn't go through. "Like a fist into a tiny Pringles can" is how she described it. We found she liked it when she got this stupidly long dildo and kept asking to push it deeper.
    She took 17" in her pussy.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 1
  • Stavinair_Caeruleum said:
    Bruh. Cervical penetration is known to happen in nature. Dogs...horses. Comeon. Is it wrong to assume that anthropomorphic canines and stuff with uh...the hardware their own individual species have, would still do the same thing?

    MrZoat said:
    This is great.

    Though -as I understand it- cervical penetration is pretty normal for real horses.

    And here is where I lost hope in humanity, but at least I'm right http://jills-thrills.blogspot.com/2009/10/ultra-deep-penetration-sex.html?m=1&zx=be9a616ac56034b9

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • One issue though, not every character will have human genitalia (like mine). For some of their species, it's normal. I won't show any internal stuff though.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • nine_tailed_fury said:
    One issue though, not every character will have human genitalia (like mine). For some of their species, it's normal. I won't show any internal stuff though.

    But namekians don't have genitals

  • Reply
  • |
  • 1
  • micknasty said:
    People know this. They don't care, unfortunately. It's been a fetish in and of itself. THE CERVICAL PENETRATION TRAIN HAS NO BRAKES.

    Yup! And itโ€™s a train I really love to ride.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • anon_the_imus83 said:
    And here is where I lost hope in humanity, but at least I'm right http://jills-thrills.blogspot.com/2009/10/ultra-deep-penetration-sex.html?m=1&zx=be9a616ac56034b9

    Holy fuck, humans can do that? While realistically I know I'm never going to be able to bottom for it... Damn if I don't want to.

    And yes, if the artist who inspired the conversation happens to read this, including the amount it's supposed to hurt. Some of us cervix-equipped people are into exceptional pain.

    Updated

  • Reply
  • |
  • 1
  • felisfurvus said:
    Humans don't exist either?
    Well fuck, I think I need to up my medication dosage then. I've been seeing those fuckers everywhere.

    I wanted to upvote you, but my childish self saw(at the time of writing this) that you were at 69 upvotes. Here is your theoretical upvote now, and I shall be back later to deliver the literal one once you, obviously, get more.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 1
  • As a male, I can assure you someone hitting your sensitive cervix is not at all comparable to someone crushing your balls, causing permanent damage. Theyโ€™re on entirely different levels. Plus, cervical penetration is a kink so screw off with your gatekeeping

  • Reply
  • |
  • 2
  • mdf said:
    You sure are brave. Bravo, men's issues aren't paid as nearly as much attention as women are. Prostrate v breast cancer for example.

    Totally. I agree too.

  • Reply
  • |
  • -1
  • I see where the artist is coming from but most men would cross their legs in pain from urethral penetration and CBT porn, but the ones who don't enjoy it even if they whine about it in the comments or in private, they blacklist it so they don't see it.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • And in this historical section kids, we see the average person with the "I don't like fiction X so it can't exist" disorder, thankfully long extinct due to inability to face basic reality, including the fact no one cares what you like and dislike in fiction. Right next to it is the so called 'simp' who went extinct due to similar reasoning, and passing all his resources to such delusional individuals and enforcing their false feeling of self importance, placed next to her for obvious reasons...

  • Reply
  • |
  • 4
  • Moonlit_Wolf said:
    To be fair, like most of the porn I enjoy on this site, I would never attempt it in real life lol.Cervical penetration scratches that "big male, small female, deep penetration" itch for a lot of people here, I'd imagine. I like to think most of them understand that drawn/animated porn, particularly of the furry variety, plays pretty fast and loose with the rules of biology/physics. I doubt, for instance, anyone who faps to vore porn is actually interested in swallowing a human being whole in real life.

    yeah we're not gonna eat a human whole. we've got to cut them up and chew smh

  • Reply
  • |
  • 1
  • wolvenedge said:
    Alright... time for the biologist/hobby anatomist to step up and tell you what for, artist.

    You're wrong on the majority of your points.
    Here's why.

    The cervix is a rigid structure that doesn't like being pried at *IN HUMANS*. Even then, many human females are pleasured by having the cervix and surrounding area stimulated. So that's one point for you, one against.

    Once you leave human anatomy behind, however, suddenly cervical penetration is practically the norm. The noble houses of Cervidae, Canidae, Equidae, Bovidae, Suidae, Tapiridae, some rodent families, and a large portion of reptiles in general, just as easy examples, have cervical penetration or ejaculation as a literal reproductive trait, and males that cannot penetrate or ejaculate through the cervix typically don't sire any young. Part two of reality refuting your point.

    Not sure if you've noticed, but the vast majority of furs depict themselves with, at the very least, traits of these animals, making pseudo-reality refute your main point as well.

    Further, as many others have pointed out, this is fiction, rules that would normally apply need not, so the nature of your own medium refutes your point by default.

    Understand a bit more now? You're point is in stark contrast with reality, smart fiction (pseudoreality, which most aim for), and raw fiction just says no out of spite.

    I must say no. Bad rabbit, sit in the corner and think about what you've done.

    Lol the prequalification of being a biologist means absolute fuckall. Fuck it since we're playing this stupid game, I too have a stem related major with a biological focus.

    Don't pretend that unless they're drawing actual animal cunts that the majority of these porn artists are actually attempting to attempt """realism""" by capturing some pseudoreality strawman. An overwhelming majority of straight furry porn features human anatomy and none of them are trying to justify cervical penetration as anything more than a fantasy kink.

    Silly coombrains will upvote anything that attempt to justify their porn as being not ridiculous. Qualifications mean jack shit if your argument holds no water in practical applications.

  • Reply
  • |
  • -3
  • Did I miss something, or is this female character, and presumably artist, complaining about this subject of breaking parts of the body for pleasure not a topic that many would usually agree on?

    Just kidding, I'm into being choked and I've got a friend who actually is into ball crushing, it's a natural phenomena to be attracted to these things, although normally it crops up as a result of mental trauma, it's still natural, and in the cases where it's someone into hurting others, while it's not as natural, it's just as connected to a form of relieving yourself of sexual frustrations as fantasizing about being hurt.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 1
  • I think this might be because most of the "women" in the furry community don't have a cervix and only a superficial, fetishised view of female anatomy.

  • Reply
  • |
  • -2
  • Man, folks really do like to try and police what others draw huh. is it really that hard for folks to basically just ignore what they dont like in terms of fetishes? also half the folks who draw it know thats not how it works. because folks really like to drive home the whole "That's not realistic" thing. they dont care, they draw it because it makes their dick hard or their pussies wet. and if it makes you cringe internally, why are you looking at it? why do you not have tags you dont wanna see blocked.

    also FYI because i wanna be a little bit of a dick here. what your drew is also inacurate. how reproduction actually works is the sperm is deposited into a basin and during the females orgasm the cervix drops down and plunges itself into the basin of sperm. maybe be accurate with how this works before you police others.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 3
  • The same author has:
    1. Lizards with boobs
    2. Birds with boobs
    3. Mammals with feathered wings
    4. Birds with wings AND arms
    5. Bats with wings AND arms
    6. Human-sized creatures with bird-sized wings capable of flight
    7. Creatures able to smile with a beak
    8. Bipedal creatures with roughly the same leg structure as their quadrupedal animal equivalents
    9. Human-like hair on furry, feathered and scaly creatures' heads
    10. Successfully interbreeding creatures of different species and even families
    11. Talking anthropomorphic animals
    Hmmmmmmm

  • Reply
  • |
  • 11
  • punlistoverlord said:
    .. also half the folks who draw it know thats not how it works. ..

    Well, if we assume a 50 % education rate, then that alone thoroughly justifies an educational illustration, would you not agree? :)

  • Reply
  • |
  • 1
  • First: pretty sure theres woman out there who enjoy having their cervix touched/penatrated
    Second: were operating in fiction, the rules of reality only apply if we want them to
    Third: from what ive gathered in this comment section, humans seem to be the only species without cervical penetration, so unless were sticking firmly to the rules of human biology, this doesnt really apply
    Fourth: i think the analogy you might be looking for isnโ€™t ball crushing, but more like trying to shove a mason jar up your ass really hard
    Fifth: if you donโ€™t like it, black list it

  • Reply
  • |
  • 2
  • How ironic, the post was meant to be "educational", the comments were far more educational, as well as entertaining, and yet... all I really learned is that there's an antithesis to the term misogyny. Everything else boils down to "masturbate to whatever you want on this website, it's all fiction. Just don't take it too far maybe," but it's still important info to keep in mind. All because this artist doesn't seem to know how fiction works. Thank you, fellow commenters, for this enlightening and amusing discussion.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 1
  • "but it's fantasy!" "but there's unrealistic/painful fetish art of males too!" Ah yes, as we all know urethral penetration and CBT is the norm on male furry porn and shows up in proportional amounts to cervix penetration.
    "Not all women are the same" not all men are the same but I'm pretty sure most would die from internal bleeding with a ruptured prostate
    It's "but not all men" all over again lol

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • Ah, here it is, the comic that allowed me to see which furry porn artist has a basic understanding of female anatomy.

    Also. As a masochist, I would love to see a comic that actually knows this fact <3

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • kbjaky said:
    Wait...

    I'm not supposed to be screaming with my legs crossed while looking at porn?

    News to me...

    This deserves every one of the 604 likes

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0