eothein created by kyma
Viewing sample resized to 66% of original (view original) Loading...
Blacklisted
  • Comments
  • Ragona said:
    That doesn't look like a girl on either end, so...Taking off the Straight tag.

    It is straight. Adding back.

  • Reply
  • |
  • -10
  • nava said:
    It would be weird to see one's nose like that all the time.

    Well, then be happy you're not a dog.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 1
  • nava said:
    It would be weird to see one's nose like that all the time.

    Well, technically you can see your own nose too, it's mostly lost in blur because it is viewed by both eyes. If dogs experience it anything like that, you wouldn't notice it that much I think.

    On topic; this is an awesome picture. <3

  • Reply
  • |
  • 3
  • Ragona said:
    That doesn't look like a girl on either end, so...Taking off the Straight tag.

    ippiki_ookami said:
    It is straight. Adding back.

    Wouldn't it depend on who's looking at the picture? If it's a guy it'd be gay, if it's a girl it'd be straight.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 2
  • Tag what you see, not what you know. Theirs no indicator on the gender of the licker, meaning its ambiguous_gender thus leaving no actual "Sexual" side to it. Aysexual? I dunno.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 1
  • RenaDyne said:
    Tag what you see, not what you know. Theirs no indicator on the gender of the licker, meaning its ambiguous_gender thus leaving no actual "Sexual" side to it. Aysexual? I dunno.

    Dude it's her and her boyfriend. Are people around here allergic to doing research or what?

  • Reply
  • |
  • -8
  • Kald

    Former Staff

    ippiki_ookami said:
    Dude it's her and her boyfriend. Are people around here allergic to doing research or what?

    Pics are tagged regardless of context.
    Because people that search pictures don't necesarily know it nor they care.
    It has always been a rule ever since the time the previous staff was owning the site : forum #244

    post what you SEE in the image, not things that have to be described from an external source

    Considering this is a perfectly logic rule, i doubt it has changed.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 1
  • See thats the thing. I see this picture I just know its a male, I dont know the gender of the "Head" and its not readily available without off-site source linking. So anyone without any information ON This picture would e unable to discern gender. It's an "Argument stopper", tag what you see, not what you know.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • RenaDyne said:
    It's an "Argument stopper", tag what you see, not what you know.

    Except for most pics using the "incest" tag.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 2
  • ippiki_ookami said:
    Dude it's her and her boyfriend. Are people around here allergic to doing research or what?

    disregard this statement

  • Reply
  • |
  • 3
  • BlackPuma said:
    Well, technically you can see your own nose too, it's mostly lost in blur because it is viewed by both eyes. If dogs experience it anything like that, you wouldn't notice it that much I think.

    On topic; this is an awesome picture. <3

    Yep. Exactly.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0