Fixed the tags. There is no indication of unbirthing, tag what you see! And cheetah? nope, looks like Foshu and she's a fox, Mango fox to be precise.

I almost licked the monitor...

This is a first person pre-unbirth picture from eyeofcalamity. Don't change the tags.

masonrulz said:
This is a first person pre-unbirth picture from eyeofcalamity. Don't change the tags.

Tag what you see for god sakes. I see no indication of unbirthing here, even if it is eyeofcalamity.

Fine then, added the source that proves that it's from a micro person's view about to be unbirthed.

masonrulz said:
Fine then, added the source that proves that it's from a micro person's view about to be unbirthed.

The rules of this site state, tag what you see, not what the source or artist have written down.

KurogamiRyuta said:
The rules of this site state, tag what you see, not what the source or artist have written down.

Listen, this was an image for those that like unbirthing, so why not let BOTH tags be there. Stop removing the tags.

masonrulz said:
Listen, this was an image for those that like unbirthing, so why not let BOTH tags be there. Stop removing the tags.

I am only telling you what other people who aren't as nice as I am, will tell you. If it's not evident that it unbirthing, the tag has no right to be there.

masonrulz said:
Listen, this was an image for those that like unbirthing, so why not let BOTH tags be there. Stop removing the tags.

But there is absolutely nothing on the image that suggests unbirthing. We might as well also tag it "cunnilingus", and "transformation". There's more in the image to suggest that she's about to be burned to a crisp by falling into the sun than there is that someone is about to crawl into her vagina.

ikdind said:
But there is absolutely nothing on the image that suggests unbirthing. We might as well also tag it "cunnilingus", and "transformation". There's more in the image to suggest that she's about to be burned to a crisp by falling into the sun than there is that someone is about to crawl into her vagina.

The artist drew the picture specifically for people who like unbirth, just let the tag stay. It isn't like it's going to hurt anyone.

masonrulz said:

The artist drew the picture specifically for people who like unbirth, just let the tag stay. It isn't like it's going to hurt anyone.

Let's say, someone types into their search "unbirthing" and this pops up. There is obviously going to be a "Wtf, I see no unbirthing." :/

masonrulz said:

The artist drew the picture specifically for people who like unbirth, just let the tag stay. It isn't like it's going to hurt anyone.

There's no evidence of any unbirthing in this image. Don't add it back.

KurogamiRyuta said:
Let's say, someone types into their search "unbirthing" and this pops up. There is obviously going to be a "Wtf, I see no unbirthing." :/

No they won't, they will be pleased because this picture was made for people that like unbirth. I'm done with you, you just can't get it through your head.

ENOUGH. There is NO Indication of unbirth in this. The tag stays OFF. Any further arguing will get a BITCHSLAP from the administration, is that fucking clear?

Princess_Celestia said:
ENOUGH. There is NO Indication of unbirth in this. The tag stays OFF. Any further arguing will get a BITCHSLAP from the administration, is that fucking clear?

Okay, I understand. Might I ask what a negative record is?

masonrulz said:
Okay, I understand. Might I ask what a negative record is?

http://e621.net/wiki/show?nordirect=1&title=help%3Auser_record

If it's 'Tag what you see', then why the fuck do we accept the artist's word on things like if it's a cunt-boy or flat-chested-female, or what the gender of a character is. Double-standards much?

tag what you see is still the stupidest rule ever.

stoneaaaaaage methods
THE WORLD IS FLAT.

TheGrimReaver said:
If it's 'Tag what you see', then why the fuck do we accept the artist's word on things like if it's a cunt-boy or flat-chested-female, or what the gender of a character is. Double-standards much?

long standing very popular repeat characters sometimes get a slight pass on this.. but very very slight. Arctic Sparkle rides in this "herm" line very lightly and any seen that doesn't clearly hint/suggest/show/tease shes a herm - the herm tag can't get added -- even tho we know shes a herm.

mikhaila is well known to be a female. We have often tagged cunt-boys/flat chested females with ambiguous gender. Or in some cases, a image was tagged one way and nobody gave a fuck about the tag.
Not every image is going to get super inspected and up on somebodies radar as this image did.

Holy shit, more awesome foshu-character stuff!

Spetznas said:
tag what you see is still the stupidest rule ever.

stoneaaaaaage methods
THE WORLD IS FLAT.

Scientific method is irrelevant to tagging images so that people can find what they want to look at.

omg! Do vvant

RedOctober said:
Scientific method is irrelevant to tagging images so that people can find what they want to look at.

This is incredibly dumb. Especially since someone looking for "unbirthing" would presumably want to see this picture as a result.

lurkingfox said:
This is incredibly dumb. Especially since someone looking for "unbirthing" would presumably want to see this picture as a result.

No, as a matter of fact I wouldn't. This image doesn't contain unbirthing. Nor is it even in an image pool containing unbirthing. This imagine is completely unrelated to the unbirthing fetish. As such, this image does not do anything in regards to arousing one's unbirthing fetish...At least, no more than any random closeup image of a vagina would.

Atani said:
No, as a matter of fact I wouldn't. This image doesn't contain unbirthing. Nor is it even in an image pool containing unbirthing. This imagine is completely unrelated to the unbirthing fetish. As such, this image does not do anything in regards to arousing one's unbirthing fetish...At least, no more than any random closeup image of a vagina would.

While I DO acknowledge the fact that you're supposed to tag what you see, but this image WAS designed for those with the unbirth fetish. You are wrong.

Mr.smartass said:
While I DO acknowledge the fact that you're supposed to tag what you see, but this image WAS designed for those with the unbirth fetish. You are wrong.

At best, this image implies a macro/micro fetish.
Due note, these images are not tagged as unbirthing, etc:
post #160010 post #178043
post #159704 post #177997
post #126508 post #179142
post #157993 post #151636

A close-up of a pussy does not equate to tagging unbirthing. Seriously, think about it. You are wrong.

....Welp. While you're all busy bitching about where tags belong, I'mana be busy staring at a fucking dream come true. Dont mind me~