Still one hell of an artist and the otter is awesome too.

I don't like the character... but meh, it's well drawn and people can take whatever they like i guess.

I remember when Mikhaila used to be female.

she is female but if you read the text it says "confused gender role and sexual identity" i.e. she believes or considers herself to be male.

itsapainfulworld said:
she is female but if you read the text it says "confused gender role and sexual identity" i.e. she believes or considers herself to be male.

I mean she used to have some semblance of breasts, even if she -was- nearly flat. Now she's got pecs, throwing her into cuntboy status.

"Socially liberal Republican"? She really IS a fictional character! ;)

Also I'm pretty sure she's always been flat, though I remember there being prototype characters that weren't.

itsapainfulworld said:
she is female but if you read the text it says "confused gender role and sexual identity" i.e. she believes or considers herself to be male.

Not quite. If she firmly believed herself to be male, she wouldn't be confused. She is simply female in the same way a trap is male. She's a reverse trap.

GreyMaria said:
I mean she used to have some semblance of breasts, even if she -was- nearly flat. Now she's got pecs, throwing her into cuntboy status.

Being a female without tits doesn't make you a boy with a vagina (holy shit that's an oxymoron if I ever saw one).

She always used to have pecs instead of breasts, and have been confused about her gender identity... She's had some semblance of breasts in past pictures, but the same is true about some recent pictures.

What are you all talking about?

GreyMaria said:
I mean she used to have some semblance of breasts, even if she -was- nearly flat. Now she's got pecs, throwing her into cuntboy status.

Because flat-chested females don't exist?

The part about being a republican made my dick go flaccid.

Nossa

"Center-leaning socially liberal Republican"? WTF? Why on earth should one put such characters into politics?

sikorsky said:
"Center-leaning socially liberal Republican"? WTF? Why on earth should one put such characters into politics?

To annoy people who can't imagine a reasonable political preference.

Guess y'all missed the "hybrid" tag. Tsampikos is fuckin' wit yas. Mika is right down the middle on all things it seems :)

eddy_hitler said:
Guess y'all missed the "hybrid" tag. Tsampikos is fuckin' wit yas. Mika is right down the middle on all things it seems :)

hybrid has been tagged the entire time...

I like the part where she's a socially liberal republican LMAO

PlutoniumBoss said:
She's a reverse trap.

Does that make her a part?

ippiki_ookami said:
hybrid has been tagged the entire time...

Yeah, that was kinda my point.

zomgerln said:
Being a female without tits doesn't make you a boy with a vagina (holy shit that's an oxymoron if I ever saw one).

Exactly...
Feminine aspect in nearly every other regard, and (despite a little confusion), a majority female gender identification = woman poorly endowed in the chesticle department, rather than a man with inverted danglies.

This stuff's on a spectrum, but what seems to cause confusion amongst a lot of people is that said spectrum is at least 2- if not 3- or 4+ dimensional not 1.

Test-Subject_217601 said:
Because flat-chested females don't exist?

That comment with that profile picture made me laugh harder than it should.

Why is it tagged cuntboy?

I like how no one has made a comment about her tooth plates...though I think she would look better if her teeth were made from the same armoured plating they use on battle tanks and sharpened to a point. Then she would be classed as indestructible.

LCPD said:
I like how no one has made a comment about her tooth plates...though I think she would look better if her teeth were made from the same armoured plating they use on battle tanks and sharpened to a point. Then she would be classed as indestructible.

They're a bit odd, but, like the rest of her, they're adorable.

miao said:
To annoy people who can't imagine a reasonable political preference.

No. It's to start shit. Injecting Politics into a Fictional Character shows that the creator doesn't consider them a REAL character, but rather, a Bludgoning stick for their Political Opinion.

Most successful Artists understand to seperate real-world politics from their characters, as when characters get tacked on Politics onto them, it ruins a large amount of their "Innocence", as it feels like they now have Dead-Set Opinions.

If those same Successful artists HAVE to make Politics, they use completely made up versions with very little references to the Real World one it's based off. Just look at Dr Seuss' "The Butter Battle Book", which, surprisingly enough, is a Reference to the Cold War between the Allied Forces and the Soviet Union, and the Legit Fears of it heating up.

You can only really see it if you either are told about it, or you squint hard enough. That's how Subtle it is.

In this case, there's no Sublety and it feels tacked on. That's my reason for the Gripefest. If it's a "Reasonable Political Opinion", WHY is it there in the First Place? It's not Subtle, and it's rather tacked on, which actually makes this feel odd or very strange.

I mean, WHY should Political Opinions even be in a Bio? Political opinions are supposed to be Footnotes, not character definitions. Political Opinions are not Character definitions, they're flavor text, so putting it in Mikhaila's ref like this, makes her look kinda... Well, Hollow.