This Family is horny.

yeah you say this isn't canon but we know the truth. and even if it isn't how bout we make it canon! Mr. Sakmat sure is on board!

Master Roshi got fuzzier I see.

Well, we know now where Keiko got her horniness from. That and she's in heat of course. Will Mrs Sakmat be far behind? And where's Mrs Yorishika?

I like this dude

...my nigg4

What a twist!

Best dad

Y E S!

Aw, she’s possessive? Boo.
I was kinda hoping she might at least take some relief from those does. It sounds like Jin might need a break during mating season.

Lol

truzyxx said:
Aw, she’s possessive? Boo.
I was kinda hoping she might at least take some relief from those does. It sounds like Jin might need a break during mating season.

It's called monogamous love buddy, not everyone enjoys polygamy, group sex or orgies, they simply love eachother and don't want to share, love is a special thing, you don't simply share it with everyone, because then it's not special anymore, and they both know it

*In an Australian accent*
Boom. Headshot.

cain-dreemurr said:
Aside from obvious humor... In this kind of situation saying "can I join?" even as a joke is the most disturbing, gross and fucked up thing you can possibly say

Meh... Not really, it's just awkward. I give it a 6.0 on the 'creep scale'.

cain-dreemurr said:
It's called monogamous love buddy, not everyone enjoys polygamy, group sex or orgies, they simply love eachother and don't want to share, love is a special thing, you don't simply share it with everyone, because then it's not special anymore, and they both know it

like moxie and millie from helva boss

In case anybody was still wondering if that one piece was canon.

Well this is a surprise. 😂

Let the deers have fun X3

i feel like the parents are acting like the ppl reading the comic think they would act. omni-horny basically.

culixstar said:
i feel like the parents are acting like the ppl reading the comic think they would act. omni-horny basically.

That is scarily accurate.

cain-dreemurr said: And like majority of humanity, polygamy is illegal in majority of the world and a bit immoral because like I said before it's not special anymore, if you love everyone then you in fact you love no one and probably never knew what really love is, simple as that

What about bigamy? And polyandry? Open relationships? Why this obsession with meddling in everyone's private life? The way I see it, there's no much difference between those and different sexualities. They're different ways of experiencing love. The fact that you and any number of people can't comprehend it doesn't make it any less real.

cain-dreemurr said:
And like majority of humanity, polygamy is illegal in majority of the world and a bit immoral because like I said before it's not special anymore, if you love everyone then you in fact you love no one and probably never knew what really love is, simple as that

What the hell are you on about? Literally none of that is accurate.

clekomuvuk01 said:
Meh... Not really, it's just awkward. I give it a 6.0 on the 'creep scale'.

I'd say 6.9 on the 'creep scale'. It's kinda creepy but not enough to make it to 7.0. Now if we're talking on the scales of how awkward it is. 8.5.

cain-dreemurr said:
And like majority of humanity, polygamy is illegal in majority of the world and a bit immoral because like I said before it's not special anymore, if you love everyone then you in fact you love no one and probably never knew what really love is, simple as that

That’s so narrow minded. Why are you even trying to argue something like that on a porn website, anyway?

anonthrowawaylurker said:
That’s so narrow minded. Why are you even trying to argue something like that on a porn website, anyway?

Reactions. Not saying that's me just in general.

This dad is always fun to be with...

anonthrowawaylurker said:
That’s so narrow minded. Why are you even trying to argue something like that on a porn website, anyway?

I'm always adding a lot of my thoughts to almost everything I say, just my nature, hate it or like it that's just the way I talk mostly

beforeyoubuy said:
Reactions. Not saying that's me just in general.

I'm not a troll buddy, I don't bait people to see their reactions if that's what you had in mind

hmmm keiko can have his human why not dad get the other 2 still i m more interested in see how hiro and minami will end

evellon said:
What about bigamy? And polyandry? Open relationships? Why this obsession with meddling in everyone's private life? The way I see it, there's no much difference between those and different sexualities. They're different ways of experiencing love. The fact that you and any number of people can't comprehend it doesn't make it any less real.

I was never saying anything about someones private life, and I've never said that there are no other ways of experiencing love, at young age majority of people experiment trying to understand what even love is and they finally know it once they truly feel it, it can take years, even decades, or sometimes it doesn't take any time at all, in vast majority of cases in most of the world most people simply choose to stay with one person for the rest of their life (or decide to live alone, sometimes this happens too)

edward3468 said:
[...] Mr. Sakmat sure is on board!

His surname is Isao, not Sakmat (that's his wife's surname). We don't know his name yet (Piporete must fix this someday).

As well someone must fix the Character's tag.

Panel 7: Not surprised he wants to join.

Optimal Father In Law

cain-dreemurr said:
I was never saying anything about someones private life, and I've never said that there are no other ways of experiencing love, at young age majority of people experiment trying to understand what even love is and they finally know it once they truly feel it, it can take years, even decades, or sometimes it doesn't take any time at all, in vast majority of cases in most of the world most people simply choose to stay with one person for the rest of their life (or decide to live alone, sometimes this happens too)

Yes, you said that it's "a bit immoral", that's judging. As long as there's consent and not collateral, anything people do is private.

And yes you said "if you love everyone then you in fact you love no one", wich is straight up denying that some people can love more than one person, wich is a way of experiencing love.

The fact that it's illegal or that the majority of the people doesn't do it (or do it in secret), is just a fact. Doesn't prove it right or wrong. And I understand that you like to say what you think, but we must also think what we say, and be prepared to back it up or admit our mistakes.

birdybutt said:
Personally, I'd prefer that not be Canon. I've never been into father/young daughter stuff like that. However, whatever is Canon to you is Canon to you.

What a stupid thing to say, if you dont like it, dont comment on it.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=89PKBpGm4bQ

LA CHANCLA!!!!

LMAO 🤣🤣🤣😂😂🤣🤣🤣
Jin just became the luckiest guy around... Keiko is basically married to his cock. Her mother has made an attempt to get at his cock. And now the deer sister's are after it as well. And dad here wouldn't mind a taste of the action... Run Jin... Run Fast...

Most comments are of Keiko's "Me so horny."

Yet no one has commented on, "Dayum, that girl can bench press her bf like nothing." D:

cain-dreemurr said:
You are talking like there is no logical reason to think like me, like my thinking is wrong and poorly judged, by saying "if you love everyone then in fact you love no one" I meant something like "if everyone is special, then no one is" you obviously CAN love more than one person, but that's temporary, you HAVE to choose sooner or later because those feelings in almost all cases are simply utrue, unsure, unbalanced, immature, unstable, confused, judged by lust, there are cases when someone TRULY loves both of his lovers but that's very rare, and both of his lovers must accept it which is even more rare, I was never saying that if all of this is right or wrong because that depends on A LOT of factors like local culture, rules, the way you were rised, traditions etc.... Wait, what we were arguing about again?

What are you, a love scientist?

These comments almost be having their own story. But hey, take it somewhere else please. we don't care to read this opinionated crap here.

Father of the year right there. The man walks in on his daughter about to have a 4-way and he still opts for the dad joke before anything else.

I like the dad

Such a good responsible father

*Boot to the head!*

I regret nothing!

Holy shit this got me rolling!

Why is there not a tag for "Worth It".

new1nter said:
Daddy gonna fck the deer girls??

The deer girls have a brother :P

Litteraly an even worse dad than teh oen in kiss x sis.

cain-dreemurr said:
You are talking like there is no logical reason to think like me, like my thinking is wrong and poorly judged, by saying "if you love everyone then in fact you love no one" I meant something like "if everyone is special, then no one is" you obviously CAN love more than one person, but that's temporary, you HAVE to choose sooner or later because those feelings in almost all cases are simply utrue, unsure, unbalanced, immature, unstable, confused, judged by lust, there are cases when someone TRULY loves both of his lovers but that's very rare, and both of his lovers must accept it which is even more rare, I was never saying that if all of this is right or wrong because that depends on A LOT of factors like local culture, rules, the way you were rised, traditions etc.... Wait, what we were arguing about again?

Your way of thinking is skewed when you align legality and morality.

kts said:
This Family is horny.

They suffer from a long genetic history of the horni

cain-dreemurr said:
It's called monogamous love buddy, not everyone enjoys polygamy, group sex or orgies, they simply love eachother and don't want to share, love is a special thing, you don't simply share it with everyone, because then it's not special anymore, and they both know it

The use of the diminutive "buddy" here suggests an attempt to provoke through condescension. If that was not your intent, I suggest reconsidering your style.

As for the rest... certainly, not everyone enjoys those things, and they have the right to that.
However, the notion that shared love is less special than mono love is so blatantly false that I'm not even sure how to argue with it; it's like trying to argue against someone claiming that water doesn't make things wet or gravity doesn't keep us on the ground.

*facepalm* Seriouse!? I am out :/

sparky221 said:
LA CHANCLA!!!!

It's a equal opportunity weapon.

Who throws a shoe? Honestly!

Yo how old is Jin is he like a teen or an adult?

thatgoodnut said:
Yo how old is Jin is he like a teen or an adult?

He is a teen even though he may not look it. Him and Keiko are both in high school.

God this comics dialogue

say'ri_sandwalker said:
God this comics dialogue

I get the impression English might not be this artist’s first language.

IS THE DAD BASED ON JHONNY BRAVO?? BECAUSE IT LOOKS LIKE THE DAD IS BASED ON JHONNY BRAVO

TO HORNI JAIL YOU GO, SAKMAT!

cain-dreemurr said:
And like majority of humanity, polygamy is illegal in majority of the world and a bit immoral because like I said before it's not special anymore, if you love everyone then you in fact you love no one and probably never knew what really love is, simple as that

The argument over monogamy versus polyamory or polygamy seems to be boiling down to one person trying to insist monogamy is the absolute standard while everything else is just a kink, fetish, or temporary. That's along the same line of thinking that a bisexual will eventually be either straight or gay with no in between, which is observably false. Talk to any bisexual person, myself included, and you'll quickly learn that sexual attraction does not fade just because of our choice in partner. In that same vein, people can and will be attracted to multiple other people, even when they're in a firm relationship. Monogamy and polyamory are just two different ways to filter out or allow for those people to pursue other partners or love interests. Granted that there are effects and costs to reckless pursuit, but any reasonable, responsible adult will generally tend towards stability, and that stability may not be with one other partner. After all, modern day monogamy was only really pushed from the rise of Judeo Christian religions because they saw sex and the pursuit of lust as one of the great sins and stains on humanity. Before that, monogamy was relatively rare, with most early civilizations allowed for multiple partners in some capacity. Most notably, Greece's standard expectation was not heterosexual and monogamy, but bisexual and polygamy or polyamory.

All of this is to say that human beings are much more complicated in how they view and express sexual interest, pursue emotional fulfillment, and form bonds than simply stating, "If you love everyone, you love no one," and trying to hold a monogamous relationship as the de facto relationship one should pursue.

cain-dreemurr said:
I'm always adding a lot of my thoughts to almost everything I say, just my nature, hate it or like it that's just the way I talk mostly

As for this, I've said this to a few people in the past and I will say it to you now. If you cannot properly articulate your thoughts and present them in a way that doesn't make you sound like a petulant, whinging child, then shut up. You can add your thoughts to everything, that's how most intelligent beings communicate: By presenting their thoughts as accurately and descriptively as they are able. If you're unable to do that, or feel you only need to add thought to a part of your statements, then do us all a favor and stop wasting our time, something you have done thus far with your incoherent and nonsensical attempts at a debate.

soldierboyxiii said:
Who throws a shoe? Honestly!

A shoe? Since Keiko was holding Jin, at first I figured she threw him.

Mr. Sakmat is the stereotypical anime/hentai dad.

lurkmore said:
In case anybody was still wondering if that one piece was canon.

THE ONE PIECE IS REAL!!!

FAMILY ORGYYY :DD

edward3468 said:
Yeah, you say this isn't canon, but we know the truth.

The artist didn't say it was non-canon. They said it was non-cannon. There was no cannon in the image, so it being non-cannon is correct, while the picture being canon or non-canon is up to interpretation.

NO!! BAD FATHER!! BAD!!! TO HORNY JAIL WITH YOU!!