I'm pretty sure that's a dude, but I can't get rid of the 'female' tag.

There. Gone. Probably forgot to remove the straight tag when you tried. Not sure if that would have any effect or not. Either way, it's fixed.

As for the picture. Murr.

It's kinda funny how many of these you have to fix when you can just go to the artists page to find out if it's straight or gay...

delicious!

Flowers said:
Not necessary. The frame looks like it could be either gender and there are no genitalia shown on the receiver. If you don't know the gender, just fap.

Ariun_Nastula is right though, just check the artists page, Razr is a guy. and unlike many furs, never draws himself female (to my knowledge)

vulpinepilot said:
Ariun_Nastula is right though, just check the artists page, Razr is a guy. and unlike many furs, never draws himself female (to my knowledge)

How does that matter to TWYS? I don't see anything that would make this either female or male, replacing gay with ambiguous_gender.

Chessax said:
How does that matter to TWYS? I don't see anything that would make this either female or male, replacing gay with ambiguous_gender.

no problem with that here. I guess I vote ambiguous tag too.

The "tag what you see" rule has an exception in place for when the image source is available and the artist specifies a detail that isn't necessarily obvious within the picture (gender, "cosplaying" as a different character, color swaps, or rule 63 a.k.a. the "every character can be female" rule). In this particular case, going to the source clarifies that both scalies in this pic are male, thus both "female" and "ambiguous gender" would be inaccurate tags.

Edited/added relevant tags and added source link.

zaffy said:
The "tag what you see" rule has an exception in place for when the image source is available and the artist specifies a detail that isn't necessarily obvious within the picture (gender, "cosplaying" as a different character, color swaps, or rule 63 a.k.a. the "every character can be female" rule). In this particular case, going to the source clarifies that both scalies in this pic are male, thus both "female" and "ambiguous gender" would be inaccurate tags.

None of that is true, only outside info we can use is character name, NOT gender nor age

zaffy said:
The "tag what you see" rule has an exception in place for when the image source is available and the artist specifies a detail that isn't necessarily obvious within the picture (gender, "cosplaying" as a different character, color swaps, or rule 63 a.k.a. the "every character can be female" rule). In this particular case, going to the source clarifies that both scalies in this pic are male, thus both "female" and "ambiguous gender" would be inaccurate tags.

Okay I've never heard of any of that before. The update to tag what you see is only for character names

Either way, "female" and "ambiguous gender" would both be inaccurate, and with the source available there really should not be any reason for the "disagrement" that hte policy is so worried about. If there is a source from the original artist or commissioner, to argue about what's in the picture is just belligerent (honestly the word I want to use is "stupid" but people get defensive about that).