created by dr621 and os
Viewing sample resized to 66% of original (view original) Loading...
Parent: post #1649185 that has a sibling (learn more) show »
Blacklisted
  • Comments
  • good fucking god, yes! Why do people look at me strange because I carry around a condom? What? just because I don't want to get fucking pregnant and your fucking herpes, does that make me some kind of lunatic?

  • Reply
  • |
  • 2
  • Honestly? Most "normal" people think that makes you some kind of slut. They expect you to be prepared for nuclear holocaust, but god forbid you even think about sex.

    Which is one of many reasons I'm a misanthrope.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 1
  • Asrayl said:
    Honestly? Most "normal" people think that makes you some kind of slut. They expect you to be prepared for nuclear holocaust, but god forbid you even think about sex.

    Which is one of many reasons I'm a misanthrope.

    Well I, for one, like the idea of gals carrying around condoms. Readiness for safe sex is of utmost importance.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 6
  • Asrayl said:
    Honestly? Most "normal" people think that makes you some kind of slut. They expect you to be prepared for nuclear holocaust, but god forbid you even think about sex.

    Using condoms should be as practiced as brushing your teeth before you go to bed... and washing your hands before you masturbate.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 1
  • erica_wolf said:
    good fucking god, yes! Why do people look at me strange because I carry around a condom? What? just because I don't want to get fucking pregnant and your fucking herpes, does that make me some kind of lunatic?

    I hope you're not carrying it in your pocket or wallet because they tend to get roughed up (and less effective) that way. solid case is pretty required.

    niko_bellic said:
    pills are alot easier, just saying

    pills don't protect against STIs.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 4
  • erica_wolf said:
    Using condoms should be as practiced as brushing your teeth before you go to bed... and washing your hands before you masturbate.

    Especially if you've been handling chili peppers that evening. I will never forget again.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • TiNaeone said:
    Especially if you've been handling chili peppers that evening. I will never forget again.

    ... It's like a train wreck. You don't -want- to see it, but you can't look away.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 1
  • wow, this pic turned into a "the more you know" about condom use. what i see in this pic is something i use to catch my cum, holding a condom.

  • Reply
  • |
  • -1
  • user1439 said: pills don't protect against STIs.

    Furries don't get such trivial human diseases such as the clap, HIV, and/or syphilis.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • deadjackal said:
    Furries don't get such trivial human diseases such as the clap, HIV, and/or syphilis.

    That's true unless you're into that sort of thing (which is, anecdotally, a fetish I've seldom seen in the furry fandom; why hasn't disease fetish been as prevalent as other deviancies?). however the discussion in the comments is about peeps.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • deadjackal said:
    Furries don't get such trivial human diseases such as the clap, HIV, and/or syphilis.

    even condoms aren't 100% effective gainst the spread of STD's, particularly AIDS which is smaller than pores in latex condoms. The more you know!

  • Reply
  • |
  • -2
  • swamprootwolf said:
    even condoms aren't 100% effective gainst the spread of STD's, particularly AIDS which is smaller than pores in latex condoms. The more you know!

    That's false. Sheepskin condoms' pores are too big to stop HIV/AIDS from spreading, but latex and polyurethane condoms both greatly reduce your chances of transmitting HIV/AIDS. Mostly their failure rate is explained by bad storage or poor production quality (don't buy on the cheap, folks).

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • user1439 said:
    That's false. Sheepskin condoms' pores are too big to stop HIV/AIDS from spreading, but latex and polyurethane condoms both greatly reduce your chances of transmitting HIV/AIDS. Mostly their failure rate is explained by bad storage or poor production quality (don't buy on the cheap, folks).

    Remember kids, only abstinence guarantees 100% protection against babies and blue waffles.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • swamprootwolf said:
    even condoms aren't 100% effective gainst the spread of STD's, particularly AIDS which is smaller than pores in latex condoms. The more you know!

    user1439 said:
    That's false. Sheepskin condoms' pores are too big to stop HIV/AIDS from spreading, but latex and polyurethane condoms both greatly reduce your chances of transmitting HIV/AIDS. Mostly their failure rate is explained by bad storage or poor production quality (don't buy on the cheap, folks).

    What? You just agreed with him saying that they greatly reduced, which means that they aren't 100% effective

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • shogun470 said:

    What? You just agreed with him saying that they greatly reduced, which means that they aren't 100% effective

    oh, my bad.
    Even abstinence isn't 100%; just read the Bible! /s

  • Reply
  • |
  • 3
  • user1439 said:
    oh, my bad.
    Even abstinence isn't 100%; just read the Bible! /s

    Haha.

    Seriously though, if somebody thinks a condom is 100% effective they shouldn't be having sex, period.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • deadjackal said:
    Haha.

    Seriously though, if somebody thinks a condom is 100% effective they shouldn't be having sex, period.

    mostly I was disagreeing with the "the pores are too big" bit of his comment.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • user1439 said:
    mostly I was disagreeing with the "the pores are too big" bit of his comment.

    I know what you were talking about... and I disagree with that part of his statement as well.

    According to http://www.avert.org/condoms.htm "The main reason that condoms sometimes fail to prevent HIV/STD infection or pregnancy is incorrect or inconsistent use, not the failure of the condom itself."

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • You preople are dumbasses. Actually look at the picture. Here's a witty comment.

    I'd tell her to put it away, it's just gonna break anyway.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • swamprootwolf said:
    even condoms aren't 100% effective gainst the spread of STD's, particularly AIDS which is smaller than pores in latex condoms. The more you know!

    actually this is a misconception started by a book call "latex technology" ~1993. They used a EM to measure the pours on a latex surface and concluded that the pours where too big to stop HIV. However, they used latex gloves instead of condoms in the test.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • ok all those afraid of having sex cause of all the possible things that could happen just dont have sex and quit bitching, cause there are people in this world who want sex and knowing that a condom is pretty damn good at preventing STDs and pregnancy is good enough for alot of us. You rarely here about pregnancy or STD transmissions while using a condom get over it.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • user1439 said:
    That's false. Sheepskin condoms' pores are too big to stop HIV/AIDS from spreading, but latex and polyurethane condoms both greatly reduce your chances of transmitting HIV/AIDS. Mostly their failure rate is explained by bad storage or poor production quality (don't buy on the cheap, folks).

    No condom is 100% effective. Thanks.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • user1439 said:
    That's false. Sheepskin condoms' pores are too big to stop HIV/AIDS from spreading, but latex and polyurethane condoms both greatly reduce your chances of transmitting HIV/AIDS. Mostly their failure rate is explained by bad storage or poor production quality (don't buy on the cheap, folks).

    No condom is 100% effective. Thanks.

    erica_wolf said:
    actually this is a misconception started by a book call "latex technology" ~1993. They used a EM to measure the pours on a latex surface and concluded that the pours where too big to stop HIV. However, they used latex gloves instead of condoms in the test.

    Oh wow! Some good info there thanks! GI I JOOOOOOOOOE!!!!

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • ippiki_ookami said:
    Um, hello? Am I the only one who sees the ridiculously sexy fox girl on the screen?

    guess this makes 2 of us

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • deadjackal said:
    Furries don't get such trivial human diseases such as the clap, HIV, and/or syphilis.

    Yes, but no such thing as real furries.

    deadjackal said:
    Remember kids, only abstinence guarantees 100% protection against babies and blue waffles.

    But... but what about virgin Mary!? D; 99.99%*?

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • deadjackal said:
    Remember kids, only abstinence guarantees 100% protection against babies and blue waffles.

    And, Actually, even abstinence isn't 100%, in certain conditions, spermatozoa can survive for up to 6 hours, and in such time, if a female happens to sit in the perfect spot, as to where the spermies make contact with enough vaginal fluid, they leap into action and begin swimming inside, and following other such conditions, pregnancy could occur. ~The more you know~ *cue strange, awkward, and rainbow-y cut-scene.*

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • ford condoms: built tough
    KFC condoms: finger licking good

    and many more WARNING: after using KFC condoms penis may
    smell and taste like kentucky fried chicken

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • meh, I wouldn't take the condom from her, for all I know she could have poked little holes in it, or it could be too big.. or small (either way is bad. if your gf says there's no such thing is a too small condom it's time to split)
    I think as a guy I'll carry my own condoms. I give the girl props though.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0