This artist is great.

Holy shit, thats some Matrixlike Anal O_O
All it needs is the time delay sound <3

Did we just enter the Matrix?

That is some classic furry loli :P
Black hole orifices, and smug about getting guys off xP

DerpForger said:
god dammit why is the best effort always put on child shit and expansion like god dammit i just wanna fepfepfep without being on sum watchlist sumwhere

That's bullshit, just stop man

DerpForger said:
god dammit why is the best effort always put on child shit and expansion like god dammit i just wanna fepfepfep without being on sum watchlist sumwhere

Your settings has a blacklist that lets you put in tags so you do not have to see them again. If you don't want to see "child shit and expansion", then blacklist:
Young
Inflation
... Specifically on seperate lines, so they are both blacklisted.

Siral_Eurgh-xan said:
Your settings has a blacklist that lets you put in tags so you do not have to see them again. If you don't want to see "child shit and expansion", then blacklist:
Young
Inflation
... Specifically on seperate lines, so they are both blacklisted.

They might want to add Expansion, cum_inflation, and tentacles to that list... Otherwise we'll see more saltiness later on other art.

Hyoukage said:
They might want to add Expansion, cum_inflation, and tentacles to that list... Otherwise we'll see more saltiness later on other art.

Cum_inflation is implied into inflation (the name says it all), but yea, expansion would be a smart idea. Also, I might want to explain that young is an umbrella tag from infant, baby, child, preteen,?teen, cub, Loli, and Shota. So yea:
Young
Inflation
Expansion

This artist has god-tier loli stuff

Ahhh, so furries are trained at a young age to be able to take in a cock...

Ughh this made me cum more times than I'd like to admit lol

Full 360 degree sexiness

textbook said:
This would be great if it weren't, you know, a child being fucked. Which is fucking repulsive, and instantly devalues what is otherwise an excellent amateur animation.

If you're attracted to kids getting fucked, you're subhuman. Period.

1: Nobody wants to hear you bitch about it being a child or cub getting fucked. Blacklist then move on.

2: You're not entitled to tell the artist what to make and what not to make.

3: Stop freaking out as if this is actual child porn. In case you haven't noticed, having a fetish for furry cubs doesn't automatically make you a fucking real life pedophile. Get over it.

Hudson said:
Please tone down your language. You don't need to be rude to inform others on any of these topics.

Noted.

iDubbbzTV said:
This artist is great.

Hey, that's pretty good!

Jesus that gave me motion sickness.

Oh look, a drama chain lel

Face the facts: These aren't real children.
If it wasn't for drawn porn, many people would be going out and fucking real children.

Slippery slope logical fallacy on your side of course: "The porn will make people want to do it."

Egg or chicken? Who can say. This porn works for my urges. I'm not raping children. Taking it away would be a very dumb thing to do.

DerpForger said:
atleast im not the only guy

and again im gonna say it again i fight the child porn here cuz its fucking child porn that will get this place taken down, e621 is good i want it to live

Good, fight child porn, just not here because this isn't child porn. It depicts a NON-HUMAN and FAKE character. Child porn is illegal because it depicts a real human, a minor, having sex or performing sexual actions, which is fucked up. This is not because it's not actually happening, there is no consent because these characters don't exist. As someone who enjoys this content, I guarantee that I'm not a pedophile and that I don't want to rape children.

DerpForger said:
its not about how we see it, its about how others see it

Others probably see e621 as being weird on its own, some think just porn is bad. Things shouldn't be restricted because they offend or may offend others, that just panders to what they want and ignores the target audience. If they don't like it they don't have to look at it.

jdan22 said:
Good, fight child porn, just not here because this isn't child porn. It depicts a NON-HUMAN and FAKE character. Child porn is illegal because it depicts a real human, a minor, having sex or performing sexual actions, which is fucked up. This is not because it's not actually happening, there is no consent because these characters don't exist. As someone who enjoys this content, I guarantee that I'm not a pedophile and that I don't want to rape children.

I doubt really that many people here are pedophiles. We just like good porn.

I love It

My god I love this loli.
I just wish I was the dude she was laying right there! ^^:

What I meant to say was: When he pulls her down over his knot.......uhh my penis could feel that! XD

If I ever make a furry image/porn hosting site, I'm going to make sure I make the tagline under the title (on every NSFW page) 'fap and let fap'

Klopper said:
My god I love this loli.
I just wish I was the dude she was laying right there! ^^:

ew what

Damn this is hot i love lolis

Commissioner of said piece here, just wanted to note that this is supposed to be the younger version of Kitty Katswell from tuff puppy hence the tag

That’s Kitty? :0

Still, amazing animation!

DinoMite said:
Commissioner of said piece here, just wanted to note that this is supposed to be the younger version of Kitty Katswell from tuff puppy hence the tag

I removed those tags. Regardless of whether you're the commissioner or not, the rules are tag what you see, not tag what the commisioner/artist claims. Nothing in this picture explicitly shows that it's Katswell; it could easily be a random cat cub.

Grojar, I have in fact read the rules. They are very clear on this:

"Unlike many other art sites, e621.net has a tagging policy called "Tag What You See" (aka: "TWYS"). With very few exceptions, TWYS says that all tags on a post must be directly verifiable within the post itself. Example: a solo picture of what APPEARS to be a male character will be tagged "male". Even if the character was defined as "female" on other sites by the artist or character owner themselves, the picture would still need to be tagged "male" on e621, because of the TWYS policy."

Those three tags are not verifiable in the picture, hence their removal. The fact that this picture has been here for over two years, and only two months ago had those tags added, and by the commissioner his/herself, proves this quite well.

Pecan said:
Grojar, I have in fact read the rules.

No, you have not.

Yes, Grojar, I have.
"The external source of information is the artist, commissioner, or character owner's own words on their own gallery or website." Which is isn't. It's here, on the e621 page. That doesn't qualify.

Also: "e.g. a post can't be tagged "Character A" just because the external source says so, when the post does not actually contain any evidence of "Character A"
It literally says right here that what I was claiming is accurate.

So once again, I ask that you please stop re-adding these tags. They are against TWYS.

Pecan said:
Yes, Grojar, I have.
"The external source of information is the artist, commissioner, or character owner's own words on their own gallery or website." Which is isn't. It's here, on the e621 page. That doesn't qualify.

Also: "e.g. a post can't be tagged "Character A" just because the external source says so, when the post does not actually contain any evidence of "Character A"
It literally says right here that what I was claiming is accurate.

So once again, I ask that you please stop re-adding these tags. They are against TWYS.

Hi, I've locked the tags since you keep removing them.

If the commissioner is saying "this character is meant to be xyz" and there's nothing contradicting this, we'll tag as xyz. Names are the only exception to TWYS and where the name happens to come from doesn't really matter. You're being overly pedantic even for e621.

Ratte said:
Hi, I've locked the tags since you keep removing them.

If the commissioner is saying "this character is meant to be xyz" and there's nothing contradicting this, we'll tag as xyz. Names are the only exception to TWYS and where the name happens to come from doesn't really matter. You're being overly pedantic even for e621.

I was not being pedantic; I am sorry you feel that way. The rules are clearly written that way; I assumed the reason it needed to be on the artist/commissioner's own page was because anybody could claim they were the artist/commissioner, and this way we knew the claim was valid.
If this isn't the case, then fine, however you should update the rules to show this, because as they are currently written, I was completely in the right.

Whyyy do we need drama on a quality post thread?

textbook said:
This would be great if it weren't, you know, a child being fucked. Which is fucking repulsive, and instantly devalues what is otherwise an excellent amateur animation.

If you're attracted to kids getting fucked, you're subhuman. Period.

Tell me something I don't know, Captain Justice.

>Whoa...

Just wanted to point out, since I can't change the tag anymore; the artist confirmed that this is NOT Katswell on Inkbunny. So, there's your contradicting evidence.

can someone explain what the locked tags have to do with this?

herobotanist said:
can someone explain what the locked tags have to do with this?

Someone claiming to be the commissioner stated this was Katswell, with no proof she was the commissioner, and the staff decided that was good enough for them to ignore both the rules asking for official confirmation, as well as the artist confirming on inkbunny that this was NOT Katswell.

Cumflation speedrun anypercent

~knottywolf~ said:
1: Nobody wants to hear you bitch about it being a child or cub getting fucked. Blacklist then move on.

2: You're not entitled to tell the artist what to make and what not to make.

3: Stop freaking out as if this is actual child porn. In case you haven't noticed, having a fetish for furry cubs doesn't automatically make you a fucking real life pedophile. Get over it.

Can I save this to reply to the other slobbering morons who think jacking it to a nonexistent younger character automatically puts them on the Sex Offender Registry as a kiddy diddler?

spenatsalami said:
That is some classic furry loli :P
Black hole orifices, and smug about getting guys off xP

"Black hole buns, make me cum..."

pecan said:
Someone claiming to be the commissioner stated this was Katswell, with no proof she was the commissioner, and the staff decided that was good enough for them to ignore both the rules asking for official confirmation, as well as the artist confirming on inkbunny that this was NOT Katswell.

So did anyone ever find out who this character is? After so long I'm really curious.