Show Search Options

wickedFauna

Member
In response to blip #126610

in response to the quote comment conundrum:

to put it simply, the program that puts quotes on replies expects reply quotes to not be nested, so when they are the text gets screwed

visual explanation

comment you want to reply to, by user C:

B said:

A said:
text_a

text_b

text_c
[quote]B said:[quote]A said: text_a[/quote]text_b[/quote]text_c

1. you press relply and the program notices it begins with a quote
2. it removes text up to the first [/quote] to keep comments clean:
text_b[/quote]text_c {your reply}
3. it quotes the text:

C said:
text_b

text_c[/quote] {your reply}
[quote]C said: text_b[/quote]text_c[/quote]
4. now it's fucked. C didn't say text_b.

how it should look:

C said:
text_c

{your reply}

in other words, always preview your comments

SNPtheCat

Member
In response to blip #126608

Daleport996 said:
@Daleport996: No wait, I think I figured out why.

This is how the quotes are structured in my original comment:

[/quote]

` it runs into, leaving this.
[code]
[/quote]

[/quote]

And when the entire comment is quoted, it gets closed when it got to the first [/quote].

[/quote]

I guess the script doesn't actually write in DText to format stuff in the background, so that's why only one [/quote] shows up at the end.

Actually that last [/quote] is removed properly since it's not nested. If there's a [​quote] it removes the next [/quote], but if it comes across another [​quote] before it encounters [/quote] it forgets it had a prior stack

[quote]
[quote][/quote]
[/quote]

     ||
     \/

[/quote]
  • View Responses
    •

    Daleport996

    Member
    In response to blip #126607

    @Daleport996: No wait, I think I figured out why.

    This is how the quotes are structured in my original comment:

    [quote]
[quote][/quote]
[/quote]

[quote][/quote]

    Then, I guess the script that handles replies removes all instances of [quote], but only removes the first [/quote] it runs into, leaving this.

    [/quote]

[/quote]

    And when the entire comment is quoted, it gets closed when it got to the first [/quote].

    [quote][/quote]

[/quote][/quote]

    I guess the script doesn't actually write in DText to format stuff in the background, so that's why only one [/quote] shows up at the end.

  • View Responses
    •

    Daleport996

    Member
    In response to blip #126604

    It's the first time in 21 years that I play using a video game controller. And it turns out I suck at using the analog stick.

    SNPtheCat said:
    That's how e6 handles using the reply function on a comment with nested quotes, it does so very poorly (i suspect to discourage quote chains/rp)

    Oh yeah, had it happen on one of my posts too.

    I suspect when it finds a [quote] it just looks for the next [/quote] and removes everything in between. Ignoring other instances of [/quote]. But I'm not sure why the other quote I made in the same comment after that also broke.

  • View Responses
    •

    SNPtheCat

    Member
    In response to blip #126601

    Critical_Stiban said:
    Nevermind it’s just comments being weird in one place.

    It's because any formatting like ` and [​code] has higher priority compared to [/quote], so if the two don't have their other pair before [/quote], it gets treated as plain text (and so doesn't end the quote)

    Oh you're talking about this
    That's how e6 handles using the reply function on a comment with nested quotes, it does so very poorly (i suspect to discourage quote chains/rp)

  • View Responses
    •

    SNPtheCat

    Member
    In response to blip #126592

    dba_afish said:
    yes!

    too much of male fashion is seen as the default and "unisex", makes it difficult for women who want to crossdress.

    you know what we need to do? what we need to do is make it more taboo for w-women-- to, umm, wear jeans and a t-shirt... so that--

    ...

    I swear that idea sounded better in my head.

    LMAO

    Nimphia

    Member
    In response to blip #126592

    dba_afish said:
    yes!

    too much of male fashion is seen as the default and "unisex", makes it difficult for women who want to crossdress.

    you know what we need to do? what we need to do is make it more taboo for w-women-- to, umm, wear jeans and a t-shirt... so that--

    ...

    I swear that idea sounded better in my head.

    LOL

    dba afish

    Member
    In response to blip #126590

    Nimphia said:
    not enough actual crossdressing girls 😞 We need crossdressing equality...

    yes!

    too much of male fashion is seen as the default and "unisex", makes it difficult for women who want to crossdress.

    you know what we need to do? what we need to do is make it more taboo for w-women-- to, umm, wear jeans and a t-shirt... so that--

    ...

    I swear that idea sounded better in my head.

  • View Responses
    •

    Nimphia

    Member
    In response to blip #126590

    Nimphia said:
    crossdressing female solo -comic -sequence -multiple_images -model_sheet

    Sad amount of mistagged lore males that are TWYS female and not enough actual crossdressing girls 😞 We need crossdressing equality... Working on both adding more and cleaning up the mistags.

    post #4166206 post #4114285 post #4229155

    <3

    I think I've cleaned it up for now, let's hope it stays clean for a bit... There were a handful of "visibly male character wearing female body suit" images I guess will have to remain as false positives.

    dba afish

    Member
    In response to blip #126581

    wickedFauna said:
    So, I've been living in mexico for some time now and I can tell you, The Bimbo Bear is probably the greatest exception to that law. I don't know if it's corruption of the law enforcement or the company found some legal loophole but he's still around alongside "Tía Rosa". I remember, right when that law was approved, they started toasting the bears face On their pre-made toast, that bear is powerful

    depending on what the penalties are they might see it beneficial to just keep using the mascot and tank any fines they get slapped with. brand recognition is extremely important, especially when what you're selling is a pretty basic product like bread, so I could see this being the case.

    wickedFauna

    Member
    In response to blip #126567

    Dripen_Arn said:
    THAT'S BIMBO!!! I KNOW BIMBO

    indeed bimbo is a mexican brand that does bread and pastries. although the Osito Bimbo® is presumably no longer used in his native homeland after the ban on mascots in food, he still lives on internationally as I can confirm in the one (1) place near me that sells bimbo stuff (including pre-toasted toast, which looks and feels about as unappetizing as it sounds)

    So, I've been living in mexico for some time now and I can tell you, The Bimbo Bear is probably the greatest exception to that law. I don't know if it's corruption of the law enforcement or the company found some legal loophole but he's still around alongside "Tía Rosa". I remember, right when that law was approved, they started toasting the bears face On their pre-made toast, that bear is powerful

  • View Responses
    •

    Chaser

    Member

    my body is a machine that turns refried beans into eaten refried beans

    coyotebear

    Privileged
    In response to blip #126566

    Dragonlord2328 said:
    Apparently its a mascot for a bakery company which is traded in the mexican stock exchange according to google

    I love that Bimbo (Mexico) bought out Canada Bread in 2014, mostly because they operate a bakery facility down the street from where I work.

    Oh, that fresh baked 🍞 smell ❤️

    dba afish

    Member

    Dripen_Arn said:
    THAT'S BIMBO!!! I KNOW BIMBO

    indeed bimbo is a mexican brand that does bread and pastries. although the Osito Bimbo® is presumably no longer used in his native homeland after the ban on mascots in food, he still lives on internationally as I can confirm in the one (1) place near me that sells bimbo stuff (including pre-toasted toast, which looks and feels about as unappetizing as it sounds)

    oh man, yeah, those packaged toast things, they kinda look like those super hard weird brown discs that they put in chex mix, but scaled up to normal bread size. hella unappetizing.

    I'm kinda surprised this brand is _that_ unknown, I feel like most grocery stores I've been to have had some amount of Bimbo products in the bread isle. cultural makeup of the area, I guess.

    Dripen Arn

    Member
    In response to blip #126565

    Mexi_Co said:
    No idea why this is tagged mexico
    post #4461147

    THAT'S BIMBO!!! I KNOW BIMBO

    indeed bimbo is a mexican brand that does bread and pastries. although the Osito Bimbo® is presumably no longer used in his native homeland after the ban on mascots in food, he still lives on internationally as I can confirm in the one (1) place near me that sells bimbo stuff (including pre-toasted toast, which looks and feels about as unappetizing as it sounds)

  • View Responses
    •

    kamimatsu

    Member

    mental breakdowns aren't fun. empathy is good and all, but it's becoming too much. i won't be making any rash decisions though. but i think there is something seriously wrong with me. i shouldn't care on this level. this is not insight. this is a defect. i would very much like it to stop.

    savageorange

    Member
    In response to blip #126557

    wickedFauna said:
    yes, in my experience the wildcard only works the way one would expect it to work when it's on both sides.
    I may be stupid

    *

    represents 0-or-more-characters.

    So searching *foo is asking for tags ending with exactly foo (eg. if there was a tag foo, that would be returned, but foot wouldn't)
    and searching foo* is asking for tags beginning with exactly foo (In this case both foo and foot would be returned)
    If you really want to search for 'tags WITH THIS FRAGMENT IN THEM', then *foo* is correct -- '>=0 characters, followed by "foo", followed by >=0 characters'

    I think there is also no limit on amount of *.

    (this is all standard glob-pattern convention, but IIRC e621 doesn't support the other parts of glob matching: ?:'exactly one character', and []: character classes, which is a whole thing )

    Daleport996

    Member

    Yeah, I can offer you some services. Just give me the serial number of your dollar bill, the date it was minted, and the digits in the corner.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 750