Topic: "Do we have a tag for that" thread

Posted under Tag/Wiki Projects and Questions

BlueDingo said:
[...]

searching for "*shoulder*" didn't bring up anything, so i believe you have the freedom to name a new tag.

Updated by anonymous

fewrahuxo said:
searching for "*shoulder*" didn't bring up anything, so i believe you have the freedom to name a new tag.

Hmm... I was thinking object_over_shoulder but that would be too broad sounding. TV Tropes calls this pose Weapon Across The Shoulder so we could make the tag weapon_over_shoulder or weapon_across_shoulder but then we'd have to add a line on the wiki page saying it can apply to things other than weapons (the baseball bat example).

Edit: Going with weapon_on_shoulder.

Updated by anonymous

Ruku said:
dusted_shoulders ?

https://www.google.com/#q=dusted look at section 2
https://www.google.com/search?q=dusted+shoulders&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiIouyr_-DTAhVnwlQKHZ0XAFsQ_AUIBigB&biw=1280&bih=637#imgrc=eA9ikcsSTXqd9M:

could apply the same for other body parts like tail of head...

I also thought about using 'dusted', but I leaded to the conclusion that it wouldn't be exactly what we are looking for.

I) 'dusted' may mean either, covered with dust or cleaned to remove dust.

II) 'dusted' is directly linked to 'dust' which don't include snow or wood shavings for example.

However it may be a possibility if we don't think in something better.

Updated by anonymous

Is there a tag for a character enjoying the cum blastoff from their partner? As in shooting far as a projectile.

Updated by anonymous

Furrin_Gok said:
Do we have a tag for a character having eyes in the back of their head?

Searching the wiki for "eyes back head" returned no useful results, so I doubt it.

Updated by anonymous

Furrin_Gok said:
post #1211559
Anything for when two characters are sleeping or cuddling together, facing one another? Essentially the opposite of spooning.

It seems to be just a hug, but involving characters lying on a surface instead of standing (however isn't so easy to identify without arms).

Updated by anonymous

O16 said:
It seems to be just a hug, but involving characters lying on a surface instead of standing (however isn't so easy to identify without arms).

Essentially what spooning is--a hug, from behind, while lying.

Sorrowless said:
Why does it need a name? It's basically cuddling.

Front to back and front to side are "Just cuddling" too, but we have spooning for front-to-back. Why not have an actual tag for front to front? Something that Missionary position could imply same as spoon position.

Updated by anonymous

Furrin_Gok said:
Front to back and front to side are "Just cuddling" too, but we have spooning for front-to-back. Why not have an actual tag for front to front? Something that Missionary position could imply same as spoon position.

Yes, but front to front cuddling can be found by removing spooning from the search.

Updated by anonymous

Sorrowless said:
Yes, but front to front cuddling can be found by removing spooning from the search.

Except for front-to-side and undertagged spoonings.

Updated by anonymous

We could use front and side cuddling but I don't think it's a big deal to not have those tags. I kind of want society to start using a word we could then use, like with spooning.

Updated by anonymous

Sorrowless said:
We could use front and side cuddling but I don't think it's a big deal to not have those tags. I kind of want society to start using a word we could then use, like with spooning.

Tonging, because the openings created by their bodies face inwards like a pair of salad tongs.

Updated by anonymous

Sorrowless said:
Wouldn't work orally as it sounds like tonguing. Pun not intended.

Tong and tongue should sound different, if pronounced properly.

Updated by anonymous

BlueDingo said:
In general, notched_ear. A bite specifically, I don't think so.

This is exactly what I was looking for, so thank you for the conveniently timed post.

Updated by anonymous

Ruku said:
do we have a tag for a color scheme that is inverted on one half of the body?

post #1162563

Contrasting_pattern or contrasting_colours?

Updated by anonymous

post #1218177
For characters who have extra hands, if they're standing upright but using their hands for standing, it's not really a handstand. Do we have a tag for it or should we just stick to my newly made standing_on_hands? I think that may be too easily confused for a handstand though, maybe something else would be better.

Updated by anonymous

Furrin_Gok said:
post #1218177
For characters who have extra hands, if they're standing upright but using their hands for standing, it's not really a handstand. Do we have a tag for it or should we just stick to my newly made standing_on_hands? I think that may be too easily confused for a handstand though, maybe something else would be better.

Can you really call it standing if the hands aren't even attached?

Any instance of a character standing on their hands is a handstand. As long as the body is upright, the orientation of the body at the time is irrelevant. In other words, this wouldn't count.

Updated by anonymous

BlueDingo said:
Can you really call it standing if the hands aren't even attached?

Yes.

Any instance of a character standing on their hands is a handstand. As long as the body is upright, the orientation of the body at the time is irrelevant. In other words, this wouldn't count.

I rather disagree--To me, a handstand is when a person is upside-down, not right-side-up. The wiki may only state upright, but it's specifically when the head is towards the bottom, not the top.

Updated by anonymous

O16 said:
Probably not, at least not yet; if appear more two or three tags like that it would be fine.

I remember finding this image a while ago of a character wearing a necktie on her head. No specific tag for this as far as I know.

There's also images of characters wearing clothing the wrong way around.

post #1109912post #252129

O16 said:
Oh, and we also have 'penis_hat' (maybe it needs a better name).

hat_on_penis?

Updated by anonymous

BlueDingo said:

There's also images of characters wearing clothing the wrong way around.

post #1109912post #252129

I guess 'doing_it_wrong' would suffice.

BlueDingo said:

hat_on_penis?

Maybe, I thought about 'hat_over_penis', the difference is subtle, but it passes the idea of covering more clearly.

I am almost sure there is a thread about this somewhere... I will find and read it and then return (it may take a while, I also have some other things to do).

Edit: Then, a lot of time later, I noticed the aforementioned post actually is one of mine (forum #226296)... I feel kind of silly now.

Updated by anonymous

Do we have a tag for a lesbian or gay being made straight and vice versa?

Updated by anonymous

VirgilHusky said:
Do we have a tag for a lesbian or gay being made straight and vice versa?

Doubt it. It sounds a bit too dialoguey (is that even a word?) to tag by sight.

Updated by anonymous

BlueDingo said:
Doubt it. It sounds a bit too dialoguey (is that even a word?) to tag by sight.

Not only that, but we don't tag sexual orientations. There is no "gay", "straight", or "lesbian" tags, they're aliased away.

I have a distinct feeling that they're asking about images featuring a change in sexual orientations, hence the above. It may be poor wording, though.

Updated by anonymous

BlueDingo said:
Doubt it. It sounds a bit too dialoguey (is that even a word?) to tag by sight.

I feel like it's something that we should have though, there's many out there that fantasize about "turning" a lesbian or gay straight. Myself included

Updated by anonymous

VirgilHusky said:
I feel like it's something that we should have though, there's many out there that fantasize about "turning" a lesbian or gay straight. Myself included

Make a set for now and we may look into it later.

Updated by anonymous

VirgilHusky said:
How do I do that?

1. Click "Sets" at the top of the page.
2. Click "New".
3. Enter the relevant data and click the "Create" button.

Updated by anonymous

VirgilHusky said:
Do we have a tag for a lesbian or gay being made straight and vice versa?

Sexual_conversion perhaps?

Updated by anonymous

Is there a tag like belly_riding, but instead of being supported by straps, the penetrated character's body is solely supported by their partners penis? It doesn't have to be horizontally orientated under a quadruped, but also include being supported vertically by a biped. I would think penis_lift would be an appropriate name for it.
post #1220872 post #1220873

Updated by anonymous

Siral_Exan said:
abdominal_bulge.

I mean more specific, not just that the character has a bulge in their abdomen, but that they clearly have a person inside them that is pushing against the skin.

Updated by anonymous

JAKXXX3 said:
I mean more specific, not just that the character has a bulge in their abdomen, but that they clearly have a person inside them that is pushing against the skin.

I don't believe such a tag should exist. It's far too specific and you can get similar, if not more, results with abdominal_bulge vore. If all you can list is a character clearly pushing through skin, then you are implying vore and I already listed the tag for bulges coming from something/someone clearly pushing through skin. Fortunately, we don't need to be specific with vore, you can also use bulge vore and minus searching to find cases where, say, where someone leaves an imprint in the vore-er's butt.

Updated by anonymous

Siral_Exan said:
I don't believe such a tag should exist. It's far too specific and you can get similar, if not more, results with abdominal_bulge vore. If all you can list is a character clearly pushing through skin, then you are implying vore and I already listed the tag for bulges coming from something/someone clearly pushing through skin. Fortunately, we don't need to be specific with vore, you can also use bulge vore and minus searching to find cases where, say, where someone leaves an imprint in the vore-er's butt.

Seeing a person getting eaten and then in the next panel seeing a bulging belly is different than seeing a full fledged outline.

Updated by anonymous

Furrin_Gok said:
Seeing a person getting eaten and then in the next panel seeing a bulging belly is different than seeing a full fledged outline.

You mean to imply that seeing a person's imprint through the stomach isn't a bulge? Do we not have tags for when you can see bulges through certain areas?

Updated by anonymous

Siral_Exan said:
You mean to imply that seeing a person's imprint through the stomach isn't a bulge?

You mean to imply seeing a single bump is the same as seeing an entire hand?

Updated by anonymous

Furrin_Gok said:
Yes, at its base, this is an abdominal bulge, but it goes beyond that.

You're not gonna find a name that's accurate and intuitive / easy to use. As a voraphiliac, trust me when I say there is no reliable name for this event, mostly because use of it removes context of what kind of vore, and adding such context provides you with a sparse amount of images. People use the not-wrong bulge and specify where the bulge is, so you don't damage the search.

Updated by anonymous

Siral_Exan said:
I don't believe such a tag should exist. It's far too specific and you can get similar, if not more, results with abdominal_bulge vore. If all you can list is a character clearly pushing through skin, then you are implying vore and I already listed the tag for bulges coming from something/someone clearly pushing through skin. Fortunately, we don't need to be specific with vore, you can also use bulge vore and minus searching to find cases where, say, where someone leaves an imprint in the vore-er's butt.

Then why does penis_shaped_bulge exist? It's very specific and could be covered by abdominal_bulge huge_penetration or abdominal_bulge ridiculous_fit. This specific tag led me to believe that there would be other variants of *_shaped_bulge tags.

Updated by anonymous

Kemono-Kay said:
There is currently a single post tagged prey_outline.

I wouldn't exactly say that's intuitive, but it would be easy to use. Tangentially related, the whole predator/prey tag really fucked over the acting of a predator & prey vore scenario (think roleplaying).

Updated by anonymous

Siral_Exan said:
I wouldn't exactly say that's intuitive, but it would be easy to use. Tangentially related, the whole predator/prey tag really fucked over the acting of a predator & prey vore scenario (think roleplaying).

I understand that's a bit of a problem, but I'm not sure how to better word it. It would need to be a relatively short way of referring exclusively to characters being eaten.

Updated by anonymous

Kemono-Kay said:
I understand that's a bit of a problem, but I'm not sure how to better word it. It would need to be a relatively short way of referring exclusively to characters being eaten.

I'm just injecting my personal opinion on prey_outline, I'm not saying no to it. Predator/prey is a personal peeve, a vore artist I follow draws a lot of it. If Furrin and Jak agrees on it, and it gets a wiki page, I'll tag it.

Updated by anonymous

Siral_Exan said:
I'm just injecting my personal opinion on prey_outline, I'm not saying no to it. Predator/prey is a personal peeve, a vore artist I follow draws a lot of it. If Furrin and Jak agrees on it, and it gets a wiki page, I'll tag it.

It could work, though not all posts would be predator/prey based. The below example isn't even really vore, though unbirthing does implicate it.
post #1050673

Updated by anonymous

JAKXXX3 said:
It could work, though not all posts would be predator/prey based. The below example isn't even really vore, though unbirthing does implicate it.
post #1050673

Prey would just be a stand-in word, since there is the contradiction "willing prey". I was willing to make a joke about predatory unbirthing, but I unfortunately couldn't find the image...

Updated by anonymous

Kemono-Kay said:
I understand that's a bit of a problem, but I'm not sure how to better word it. It would need to be a relatively short way of referring exclusively to characters being eaten.

Not just eaten, anal vore and unbirthing count too. Hell, could just be a character is pregnant and has the baby pushing out with such force that their hand or foot actually outlines.

Updated by anonymous

Furrin_Gok said:
Not just eaten, anal vore and unbirthing count too. Hell, could just be a character is pregnant and has the baby pushing out with such force that their hand or foot actually outlines.

Are there even any existing posts of a baby (not unbirthed character) doing that? Also, due to to implications, all kinds of activity whereby a character enters more than one limb into another character would count as vore, 'eating' isn't always involved.

A possible solution would be the creation of a new tag, such as body_outline to replace prey_outline (which has only been used on 1 post anyway). Oh, it looks like body_outline has already been used for the very purpose I was requesting. I'll edit the wiki article to explain it.

Updated by anonymous

JAKXXX3 said:
Are there even any existing posts of a baby (not unbirthed character) doing that? Also, due to to implications, all kinds of activity whereby a character enters more than one limb into another character would count as vore, 'eating' isn't always involved.

A possible solution would be the creation of a new tag, such as body_outline to replace prey_outline (which has only been used on 1 post anyway). Oh, it looks like body_outline has already been used for the very purpose I was requesting. I'll edit the wiki article to explain it.

Well, there we go.

I don't know of anything specific, but I'm sure there are images of pregnancies like that. In that case, I can certainly agree that just having to throw on pregnant or vore to the search is fair.

Updated by anonymous

I guess body_outline works.

Oh, I've been looking to find a tag meant for jewellery worn on the forehead, like this:
post #2004

It's worn on a sort of chain, so it's not a circlet, and I don't think it can be classified as a headband either. So what's this called and do we have a tag for it?

EDIT: I've looked through a "*penis*" search and nothing has come up about being lifted by a penetrating penis. penis_riding comes closest I guess? But I think a new tag might be appropriate.

Updated by anonymous

JAKXXX3 said:
Are there even any existing posts of a baby (not unbirthed character) doing that? Also, due to to implications, all kinds of activity whereby a character enters more than one limb into another character would count as vore, 'eating' isn't always involved.

A possible solution would be the creation of a new tag, such as body_outline to replace prey_outline (which has only been used on 1 post anyway). Oh, it looks like body_outline has already been used for the very purpose I was requesting. I'll edit the wiki article to explain it.

No. Body outline is fairly literal, and I noticed that you added the tag to images recently. I did provide you cases where penis_shaped_bulge (plural because the example was repeated) is misused, so do you really think other cases where the body is being outlined against a background, or cases where parts of the body is outlined due to, say, clothing, would not be tagged by users other than you?

Prey_outlines implies vore of some sort, it is harder to misuse.

Updated by anonymous

Genjar

Former Staff

Body_outline sounds like those chalk corpse outlines that detectives sometimes draw in fiction (and only in fiction, nobody does that in real life). Better pick something else.

Updated by anonymous

Siral_Exan said:
No. Body outline is fairly literal, and I noticed that you added the tag to images recently. I did provide you cases where penis_shaped_bulge is misused, so do you really think other cases where the body is being outlined against a background, or cases where parts of the body is outlined due to, say, clothing, would not be tagged by users other than you?

Prey_outlines implies vore of some sort, it is harder to misuse.

My edits to the wiki entry of body_outline clearly specifies a character being inside of another character, pushing against the skin. There were 50 posts with the tag before I added to it, if you think that prey_outline is a better tag then you can create an alias suggestion.

Prey_outline is not a perfect candidate, as not all vore images are based on a prey/predator dynamic or involve eating/consuming others. Some of them are purely sexual, such as anal_vore, cock_vore, and even extreme fisting whereby the inserted hand may be imprinted on the characters stomach.

Genjar said:
Body_outline sounds like those chalk corpse outlines that detectives sometimes draw in fiction (and only in fiction, nobody does that in real life). Better pick something else.

There already is a chalk_outline tag, though it has only been used once.

Updated by anonymous

JAKXXX3 said:
My edits to the wiki entry of body_outline clearly specifies a character being inside of another character, pushing against the skin. There were 50 posts with the tag before I added to it, if you think that prey_outline is a better tag then you can create an alias suggestion.

Prey_outline is not a perfect candidate, as not all vore images are based on a prey/predator dynamic or involve eating/consuming others. Some of them are purely sexual, such as anal_vore, cock_vore, and even extreme fisting whereby the inserted hand may be imprinted on the characters stomach.

You have not dealt with any voraphiliac images, have you? References to prey and predators, in any regard, are stand-ins to the involved parties. They aren't meant to be literal unless it's predatorial vore (describing, the name is looser).

Think of it like a contract, or if you've ageplayed think of the difference between the baby and the babysitter; there is no difference in reality, other than the actions they are taking. The words only exist to describe, not to be literal.

Updated by anonymous

Siral_Exan said:
You have not dealt with any voraphiliac images, have you? References to prey and predators, in any regard, are stand-ins to the involved parties. They aren't meant to be literal unless it's predatorial vore (describing, the name is looser).

Think of it like a contract, or if you've ageplayed think of the difference between the baby and the babysitter; there is no difference in reality, other than the actions they are taking. The words only exist to describe, not to be literal.

I'm not very experienced in either of those kinks, no. Isn't it important that tags are simple and easy to understand for new users? Are you assuming that the average user would be knowledgeable of those kinks?

Updated by anonymous

JAKXXX3 said:
I'm not very experienced in either of those kinks, no. Isn't it important that tags are simple and easy to understand for new users? Are you assuming that the average user would be knowledgeable of those kinks?

People should know what stand-in words mean. I mean, if you don't a large amount of American English would be damaged apon translating (or even shorthanding/longhanding), and people have to use English words on this site for a reason.

I mean, do you know why a female can be called a cougar, or what in-bed roleplaying is? You need to assume that people know the basics of English on this site, and some sexual terminology; I might halfheartedly believe everyone is an idiot, but even such "idiots" know how to use a dictionary if they're on this site.

But wittiness aside, being a prey towards a predator can be interpreted literally to understand what the prey_bulge tag means. We wouldn't tag them, themselves, as predator or prey because contexts that remove that, but you can refer to them in English as a predator and a prey... right?

Updated by anonymous