The bulk update request #5679 is pending approval.
create implication clothed_ambiguous (135) -> clothed (1062113)
create implication clothed_andromorph (132) -> clothed (1062113)
create implication clothed_anthro (11870) -> clothed (1062113)
create implication clothed_female (12537) -> clothed (1062113)
create implication clothed_feral (7538) -> clothed (1062113) # duplicate of implication #9517
create implication clothed_gynomorph (2659) -> clothed (1062113)
create implication clothed_herm (77) -> clothed (1062113)
create implication clothed_human (903) -> clothed (1062113)
create implication clothed_humanoid (752) -> clothed (1062113)
create implication clothed_intersex (2729) -> clothed (1062113)
create implication clothed_male (10502) -> clothed (1062113)
create implication clothed_maleherm (32) -> clothed (1062113)
create implication clothed_taur (215) -> clothed (1062113)
Reason: In my tagging, I've noticed that some (if not all) of the [state of clothedness] (by) [character {gender}/{body type}] tags do not implicate the logical parent tags (ex. clothed_female does not imply clothed). Even if there are any preexisting implications, this should cover all bases by requesting ones for all variations at once.
Requesting seven bulk updates grouped by the parent tags, navigation for the topic posts of which below:
- topic #40835 — Implications of the "fully_clothed" tag
- topic #40836 — Implications of the "clothed" tag ◀ (You are here)
- topic #40837 — Implications of the "partially_clothed" tag
- topic #40840 — Remaining implications of the "topless" tag
- topic #40841 — Remaining implications of the "bottomless" tag
- topic #40838 — Implications of the "mostly_nude" tag
- topic #40839 — Implications of the "nude" tag
Updated
