Topic: Not_Furry not used enough, Feral is over-broad and Anthro is vague

Genjar

Former Staff

Jackal32 said:
However bestiality implies Feral by its definition on this site which includes stuff like this: post #876389. So which is it?

There's a feral horse, therefore it's considered furry enough. Not_furry is only tagged if there's no furry(ish) characters at all. You can add -human and -humanoid search modifiers to exclude most non-furry characters.

Then Anthro takes the vague stance of everything anthropomorphic while in the same wiki noting its common usage as to being mostly human or bipedal. So if we include inanimate objects some don't even have legs so it is vague.

The anthro wiki entry has needed rewriting for a long while. Living objects belong in the inanimate category (and possibly also in humanoid, for ones such as post #239980), not in anthro.

Updated by anonymous