Topic: Not_Furry not used enough, Feral is over-broad and Anthro is vague

Genjar said:
There's a feral horse, therefore it's considered furry enough. Not_furry is only tagged if there's no furry(ish) characters at all. You can add -human and -humanoid search modifiers to exclude most non-furry characters.

The anthro wiki entry has needed rewriting for a long while. Living objects belong in the inanimate category (and possibly also in humanoid, for ones such as post #239980), not in anthro.

All I see are the lower quarters of two very large horses. So I a disagree there but I missed the fact that they are catgirls, damn. Thats still about as low as you go on the Furry meter. Still the other two examples are credible. More importantly there is still going to be exceptions where Bestiality won't be Feral (Furry) characters or anything even Furry-ish.

It's good to know about the anthro wiki. Should I update it?

Updated by anonymous