Recap of proposed terms/systems + more details on the latter

@GDelscribe:
Hahah that's fine, it's probably for the best at the moment, since the combined proposal looks really complex without enough documentation or explanation about how it relates to the current tagging system

-
+ @All:
Ok, updated the OP for forum #140749 - Physical Gender Name Standardization: aliases/discussion
somewhat, but didn't do any additional summarizing other than what was said here and here

What I did do though, is create a more detailed explanation of the combined tagging system proposed here

You can read all about it here

[tl;dr- there are about 20 self contained tags total with the proposed system, including the 4 basic sex-gender tags.
They all work with nested implications]