Genjar said:
Based on how it is currently tagged, short_stack is simply a random mix of wide_hips, thick_thighs, slightly_chubby and big_breasts. Plus some big_head.
Not complete, but true insofar as it goes.
We've been trying to move away from using the short and tall tags, because those don't mesh well with twys
Well, it's pretty integral here AFAICS. Take a 7-heads-high character with wide_hips thick_thighs slightly_chubby big_breasts ..
post #977443 or post #968111
...does not look like shortstack, because height dramatically effects the appearance of those traits.
Might qualify as shortstack:
* post #977480 (est. 4.6 heads high)
Technically not shortstack but close enough, ie. looks roughly right:
* post #900424 (legs are notably too long)
Definitely not shortstack:
- post #961089 (hold me, I'm scared)
- post #958372 (8 heads high
- post #919160
- post #910683
Not to mention that we generally don't use sex-specific tags, especially not ones that are restricted to a single sex, with no equivalent tags for other sexes.
Hey, I'm not promoting it per se, I'm just saying that..
If there needs to be a tag for that shape, something like bottom_heavy or pear_shaped would work better.
.. well, right now I'm saying I don't see how that has anything to do with shortstack.
At all.
EDIT: I can kind of see why you might think that, but imo that's just the consequence of cramming the same features into less height (ie. just exaggerates typical female body shape)
But overall I was gonna say, what you are proposing as 'equivalent' doesn't seem to really be equivalent.
Updated by anonymous