AlexHusky112 said:
Well I wouldn't make an entire community suffer for what some SJW or troll said.It's a double standard and it's sad how the anti-cub and SJW's make the administrators of furry sites their bitch.
"You guys completely miss the point of the "business" part of the decision. Furry Network wants to earn money by offering a commission service through a merchant that gives otherwise non-existent securities to both the commissioner and the artist. With this simple truth out of the way the issue becomes rather clear: how many merchants would allow their service to be used to create art that resembles child pornography in front of an actual judge?
It's completely irrelevant what any one of us feels about the thematic because most of the judges don't give a fuck, thus it had to go. It would have taken one person to whine to the merchant about FN peddling CP through their service and the thing would have been shut down faster than a reactor in case of an earthquake."
This is going to sound rude no matter how I word it: don't just read the title and half of the first post before deciding what your opinion on a matter is. Learn the whole situation.
Updated by anonymous