Genjar said:
Yeah, it's best to keep exceptions to minimum. Users will tag it anyway,
so there's no point in trying to exclude certain species.Flaming_tail, for instance. Tagged 3000+ times, mostly for the Charmander evo-line, the rest consist mostly of hybrids and Red XIII. At least this cheek_markings (or whatever it should be called) covers a lot more than just Pokemon.
(Still thinking about the name. Looks like users have tried to tag these in the past as cheek_dots, cheek_spots, etc.)
yeah, but the problem here is that whatever you come up with will overlap severely with blush_stickers. What is a marking, and what is blush? There are very very few images like this one that have the fidelity to tell for certain. For instance Kirby always has what I would consider to be blush_stickers on his face:
So...is that a marking or is he just constantly blushing? That's pretty much unknowable. With pikachu his cheek markings are such a deep red that it's pretty well understood that they have to be a marking, whereas with other characters it's unclear, and thus they shouldn't be tagged as a marking. That's why I'm saying the tag is going to be 99% pikachu...there's a lot less ambiguity with something like flaming_tail...I mean...you see a fire on a tail it can really only be one thing.
Updated by anonymous