Topic: Tag Implication: bisexual_sandwich -> sandwhich_position

Implicating bisexual_sandwich → sandwhich_position
Link to implication

Reason:

Misspelling intentional, otherwise this wont post and I've no idea where else to suggest it.

These two are already implied, however, according to the sandwich position page, the middle party must be being penetrated by both outer parties. This is only possible if the participating party consists of a male, a female, and another female with a strap-on. Suggestion is to remove the implication.

Post 1609770 is an example where it should be train_position, but due to the implication from bisexual_sandwich, I am unable to remove the sandwich_position tag.

EDIT: The tag implication bisexual_sandwich -> sandwhich_position (forum #262182) has been rejected by @gattonero2001.

Updated by auto moderator