I mean, I know I'm getting annoying to saying the same thing over and over and over....

But it's just that I don't understand, what do my posts have than Robinebra ones have.

I uploaded some pics from LowKeyDiag and they got deleted because of the "Minimum quality standards", I'm not saying that the Robinebra's pics have to be deleted, but it's just that I think that is no fair

OK so let's skip hint talk and get right to the point because people seem to like that.
You seem to have uploaded some human only art which isn't allowed.
As for the 3D models, to be blunt, it just looks low effort, like someone snagged a penis off of sfmlabs and slapped it on, called it a day. (probably the case)

If you have a issue with a deletion, you can always contact the person who deleted it, and debate the deletion.

Same artists pictures posted by robinebra has also been deleted for quality reasons.

You can see them all here:
https://e621.net/post/index/1/lowkeydiag%20status:deleted%20user:robinebra

Also we look at posts individually, not by uploader or artist.

"Dude", why not go over the wiki and check that there uploading guidelines. Preferably before going off and calling over another user's uploads for comparison, that can get real annoying when you're the person they're comparing to...

Chaser said:
As for the 3D models, to be blunt, it just looks low effort, like someone snagged a penis off of sfmlabs and slapped it on, called it a day. (probably the case)

The majority of 3D futa in a nutshell. Sometimes, they don't even try to match up the skin tones or hide the point where the models clip.

Mario69 said:
Same artists pictures posted by robinebra has also been deleted for quality reasons.

You can see them all here:
https://e621.net/post/index/1/lowkeydiag%20status:deleted%20user:robinebra

Also we look at posts individually, not by uploader or artist.

Ok, right. But what's wrong with them? They have the same quality (I guess 😥) and are from the same artist. (I'm taking about my pics)

Bacon4Life said:
Ok, right. But what's wrong with them? They have the same quality (I guess ) and are from the same artist. (I'm taking about my pics)

There are actually several 3D, especially SFM artists which make me want to press delete button much more often.

This particular artists uses the same body model on all of the characters, the body model itself is already really, really bad (another example of artist using same body: post #1168395, source ) and artist has no idea how to improve them or hide the flaws for the fetishes they are trying to portrait. Most obvious examples are that characters heads aren't sometimes attached to their bodies, body parts which has been expanded have clearly visible polygons, having characters do anything else than stand make models akwardly twist and collide and penises always look like they suppose to belong to character, but look like some addon just thrown in.

And just to top that, of course this artist have to have only one pose, then have the versions with two angles, with and without clothes, normal and polygon breasts, pussy and penis attachement and combination of all of these. And maybe one additional with photo filter.

All of their work is horrible and really low quality, spammable content. Only value they have is pornographic and if that's all you want, then you can easily follow and look up artists works on sites they release their stuff. If someone posts their sexy image made with ms paint, it's most likely not kept here either. Because posts are usually handled seperately and passable quality for 3D has been kept really low, some of the artists images have been above passable or have gotten themselves trough when someone approving stuff has been in crunch mode.

Mario69 said:
Because posts are usually handled seperately and passable quality for 3D has been kept really low, some of the artists images have been above passable or have gotten themselves trough when someone approving stuff has been in crunch mode.

3D artwork and tween-style animations both seem to have a very low threshold for quality on this site. I guess when you're using someone else's assets that don't look bad on their own, the final product still can look passable even if incompetently made.