What is your opinion on dickgirl and things related to it?

Didn't bother to read the question.
Just came here to say "useless thread title is useless"

On some planets, making a vague thread title is a crime punishable by death.

Unfortunately, e621 is not hosted on that planet.

This is the sort of question that I read and immediately assume it was typed out with one hand.

They are nice, when they are feminine and just have a dick with a nice fat knot.

yeah Ratte's dick is huge

Yes. :3

I don't have any questions right now, so, be back when I have some.

razzy_girl said:
What is your opinion on dickgirl and things related to it?

They are unneeded. Pussies only plz.

Knotty_Curls said:
On some planets, making a vague thread title is a crime punishable by death.

Unfortunately, e621 is not hosted on that planet.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TSxlYDG3RS0

razzy_girl said:
What is your opinion on dickgirl and things related to it?

Males with tits are too mix-'n'-match for my liking. I prefer a complete set over a mix.

I'm not into hybrids for the same reason.

There are no chicks with dicks, Johnny! Only guys with tits!

Something else I find off about them is you rarely find a normal-sized one. I know porn in general has a thing for oversized body parts but dickgirls and herms seem to do it more frequently. So many 17" G's, so few 7" C's.

I have a small theory about dickgirls and futa, etc. I think breasts are the far more interesting secondary sexual characteristic, because they're visible while clothed, they protrude from the body, etc. The same goes for the penis as a primary sexual characteristic. A vagina on the outside is kind of nondescript, even if it's er... 'meaty,' etc. I mean if a woman's just standing there naked, you can hardly even see it. So, by having breasts and a penis, a dickgirl or a hermaphrodite with breasts is a combination of the most overt, sexually implicit imagery possible and is therefore the single most 'whole' depiction of a sexually stimulating person, which makes them interesting and appealing. For example, when I see breasts or a penis, it's the sexual implications that those features have, not strictly the organs themselves, that's attractive and that's why I like dickgirls.

vJdKaanv said:
I have a small theory about dickgirls and futa, etc. I think breasts are the far more interesting secondary sexual characteristic, because they're visible while clothed, they protrude from the body, etc. The same goes for the penis as a primary sexual characteristic. A vagina on the outside is kind of nondescript, even if it's er... 'meaty,' etc. I mean if a woman's just standing there naked, you can hardly even see it. So, by having breasts and a penis, a dickgirl or a hermaphrodite with breasts is a combination of the most overt, sexually implicit imagery possible and is therefore the single most 'whole' depiction of a sexually stimulating person, which makes them interesting and appealing. For example, when I see breasts or a penis, it's the sexual implications that those features have, not strictly the organs themselves, that's attractive and that's why I like dickgirls.

That's not a theory, it's an opinion and one I don't personally agree with. Solo dickgirls are unappealing to me, but dickgirl/herm on female is palatable in small doses. I just personally prefer the genuine female body.

Anyways, it appears everyone else is just treating this thread like a joke. And so the trend of cynical sarcasm continues.

razzy_girl said:
What is your opinion on dickgirl and things related to it?

Not a fan. If you’re into it, good for you. We all have our own tastes and I prefer my women with vaginas.

Munkelzahn said:
Didn't bother to read the question.
Just came here to say "useless thread title is useless"

i'm very sorry, but i'm desperate: how can i set the esplicit rate? i searched for about 2 hours
thanks!

unknowbo said:
i'm very sorry, but i'm desperate: how can i set the esplicit rate? i searched for about 2 hours
thanks!

https://imgur.com/a/QCeE0

Knotty_Curls said:
https://imgur.com/a/QCeE0

thanks a lot, mate!

razzy_girl said:
What is your opinion on dickgirl and things related to it?

I have very strong opinions about dickgirls/cuntboys (or whatever term we're going by now), but I'm not allowed to talk about it.

Herms: what I like and what I don't (Jan. 2015)

I know what I said and how I said it lol

Searching my favs for ~dickgirl ~herm, I seem to only have accumulated ~3.2% contamination, so I mustn't be too far gone. By that metric, anyway.

Intersex variants in porn represent an unmet need or desire.

Knotty_Curls said:
yeah Ratte's dick is huge

You've seen it too?

abadbird said:
Searching my favs for ~dickgirl ~herm, I seem to only have accumulated ~3.2% contamination, so I mustn't be too far gone. By that metric, anyway.

It's probably more a sign of self-control. Then again, intersex images only make up ~5% of this site's content so a low percentage in your favourites is kinda expected.

Faux-Pa said:
I have very strong opinions about dickgirls/cuntboys

I'm sure you do.     

Faux-Pa said:
but I'm not allowed to talk about it.

Why not?

...in regards to their depiction in modern art and porn, Too many female cookie cuts with a penis simply slapped on and not enough variety in body-form...

you can have herms or dickgirls with breasts without requiring a completely female body>>

I kind of despise them...because every time an artist draws an image of one of my favorite characters as a dickgirl that's one less image that could have been her as her usual gender. That probably sounds greedy, but meh that's how I feel. It's not that I want to deny anyone porn, I just want MORE PORN for myself. If every R34 artist just made a female version when they make a dickgirl image I'd be 100% cool with it, everyone would win in that case, but most don't do that.

I'm also huge fan of certain female characters that are...idk how you say it...dominating? Juri han, Lord Dominator, Korra...powerful females. The annoying thing is that these sorts of characters seem to attract an inordinate amount of futanarization...I guess people think "oh, that's a strong woman, I BETTER GIVE HER A DICK THEN." I guess they figure any character in a dominant role needs a dick. It's annoying AF.

There's also a weird trend where over time I feel like the longer an artist does erotic art the more they trend towards drawing dickgirls. There are artist I've literally seen transform from drawing almost exclusively what I'd say is "normal" porn, male on female, to almost exclusively dickgirl porn.

As an artist myself I can only guess that they just get bored? Trying to move on to the next thing, I can completely understand as my own art has only gotten more extreme and strange over time, but it's still not my cup of tea, so it's quite annoying to me when I see an artist undergo this transformation which renders their work largely unappealing to me.

All that said I will look at dickgirl on female, but I still completely avoid solo dickgirl or dickgirl on male.

Dyrone said:

There's also a weird trend where over time I feel like the longer an artist does erotic art the more they trend towards drawing dickgirls. There are artist I've literally seen transform from drawing almost exclusively what I'd say is "normal" porn, male on female, to almost exclusively dickgirl porn.

As an artist myself I can only guess that they just get bored? Trying to move on to the next thing, as an artist myself I can completely understand as my own art has only gotten more extreme and strange over time, but it's still not my cup of tea, so it's quite annoying to me when I see an artist undergo this transformation which renders their work largely unappealing to me.

All that said I will look at dickgirl on female, but I still completely avoid solo dickgirl or dickgirl on male.

chances are more often then not its not because of the artist but the commissioners they get, not many artists actually are willing to draw herms and even less do them well so of course being part of a small base commissioners can choose from those artists can make alot money but they may also end up getting flooded with commissions of one particular type....

post #864106

Not into them even in the slightest. To push it further I'd even say they disgust me to a huge degree(And they do). Because reasons.
I prefer to try and avoid seeing ladydick as much as I can, the blacklist helps a lot but some sites don't even have that. COUGHSFuraffinityCOUGHS

They're Overrated and overdone too, impo. I much rather a normal female with a pussy, with a optional strapon.

I find humanoid breasts unappealing, so by extension I tend to dislike anthro/humanoid dickgirls and herms.

Though I usually keep that to myself, since it's just a personal preference that shouldn't matter either way.

I'm not a fan of them but to each their own.

I sometimes like dickgirl/female, but that's pretty much it in terms of my preference. But I do sometimes find myself disappointed that I'm not into solo dickgirls because I've seen some pretty good stuff involving them, yet I can't fully appreciate them because I'm not into the dickgirl part.

But as of now, I do have plans on one or two dickgirl FCs so I can add a little variety with my current FCs.

razzy_girl said:
What is your opinion on dickgirl and things related to it?

its kind of an acquired taste, but personally love dickgirls and herm girls alike.

vJdKaanv said:
I have a small theory about dickgirls and futa, etc. I think breasts are the far more interesting secondary sexual characteristic, because they're visible while clothed, they protrude from the body, etc. The same goes for the penis as a primary sexual characteristic. A vagina on the outside is kind of nondescript, even if it's er... 'meaty,' etc. I mean if a woman's just standing there naked, you can hardly even see it. So, by having breasts and a penis, a dickgirl or a hermaphrodite with breasts is a combination of the most overt, sexually implicit imagery possible and is therefore the single most 'whole' depiction of a sexually stimulating person, which makes them interesting and appealing. For example, when I see breasts or a penis, it's the sexual implications that those features have, not strictly the organs themselves, that's attractive and that's why I like dickgirls.

interesting theory. makes a lot of sense too. that's probably the reason I like dickgirls too.

Personally, I really am not into it at all. I may sound like some burly brainless caveman, but I rather enjoy females in their standard format, with a vagina. However, I have also blacklisted 'cuntboy' because I like such lady parts to be attached to female subjects.

I would like to say however, I have naught against the content and those who enjoy it instead of me.

If it's not hyper or excessively large, but done just right, I do enjoy art of them, yes.

They can be pretty hot if done right.

Don't really care for them, cuntboys, or herms, I prefer genitals that correspond to their natural sex, it doesn't work otherwise.

ThatBIackGuy said:
Don't really care for them, cuntboys, or herms, I prefer genitals that correspond to their natural sex, it doesn't work otherwise.

not to start a controversy but please define natural sex, keep in mind we are talking about anthropomorphic animals for the most part and some species are naturally hermaphroditic and others of course can also be born hermaphroditic or intersexed thru natural genetic mutations that could be considered evolutionary adaptions.

It works, and I like them. That's really all I can say about the matter without adding any unnecessary humor or some pompous, mostly creepy remark.

Darou said:
not to start a controversy but please define natural sex, keep in mind we are talking about anthropomorphic animals for the most part and some species are naturally hermaphroditic and others of course can also be born hermaphroditic or intersexed thru natural genetic mutations that could be considered evolutionary adaptions.

He probably means things that qualify as typical males and females by human standards.

Darou said:
not to start a controversy but please define natural sex, keep in mind we are talking about anthropomorphic animals for the most part and some species are naturally hermaphroditic and others of course can also be born hermaphroditic or intersexed thru natural genetic mutations that could be considered evolutionary adaptions.

XX= female/vagina
XY= male/penis

And I'm aware herm's actually exist, but they don't have a human penis glued above a human vagina, and no, a species doesn't just become a herm because the genitals got deformed. Also mutations aren't "natural", those two words contradict one another.

ThatBIackGuy said:
XX= female/vagina
XY= male/penis

Except birds, where ZW=female and ZZ=male.

ThatBIackGuy said:
Also mutations aren't "natural", those two words contradict one another.

That's debatable. A massive mutation like suddenly growing an extra arm is definitely unnatural but evolution happens via a very long process of tiny mutations.

Ah, well I'm personally into the concept of shemales/herms/cuntboys/misc. intersex, etc. I just really like the diversity of it and how it can create slightly more interesting backstory. After all, I need some kind of story with my porn or I end up asking too many questions or bored. That, and it adds a bit of visual interest shock? If that makes any sense?

Then again, simply a personal opinion.