"If the character has female genitalia and/or characteristics but also visible male genitalia, they should be tagged as intersex (herm, cuntboy, or dickgirl) instead of female."

Except that only one of the three forms of intersex listed there actually have both female genitalia and male genitalia. Dickgirls have male genitalia, but no female ones, whereas cuntboys are the exact opposite. Unless the parenthesized part was just trying to clear up what "intersex" covers, in which case, that could really be made clearer...So, should I change it to read "tagged as herm instead of female," or to better clarify that the words in parentheses are listing ALL things intersex?

Jacob said:
"If the character has female genitalia and/or characteristics but also visible male genitalia, they should be tagged as intersex (herm, cuntboy, or dickgirl) instead of female."

Except that only one of the three forms of intersex listed there actually have both female genitalia and male genitalia. Dickgirls have male genitalia, but no female ones, whereas cuntboys are the exact opposite. Unless the parenthesized part was just trying to clear up what "intersex" covers, in which case, that could really be made clearer...So, should I change it to read "tagged as herm instead of female," or to better clarify that the words in parentheses are listing ALL things intersex?

It says "female genitalia and/or characteristics, and also visible male genitalia".

Female genitalia and characteristics, and also visible male genitalia -> herm.
Female genitalia but not characteristics, and also visible male genitalia -> maleherm
Female characteristics but no genitalia, and also visible male genitalia -> dickgirl

The only one which is incorrect here is cuntboy, because a character should not be categorized as such if they have visible male genitalia. And maleherm is missing, but it's a subcategory of herm so that's not the end of the world there.

Anyway point being, your proposed edit is not entirely correct.

Clawdragons said:
It says "female genitalia and/or characteristics, and also visible male genitalia".

Female genitalia and characteristics, and also visible male genitalia -> herm.
Female genitalia but not characteristics, and also visible male genitalia -> maleherm
Female characteristics but no genitalia, and also visible male genitalia -> dickgirl

The only one which is incorrect here is cuntboy, because a character should not be categorized as such if they have visible male genitalia. And maleherm is missing, but it's a subcategory of herm so that's not the end of the world there.

Anyway point being, your proposed edit is not entirely correct.

Okay, fair. But I feel I should point out I proposed two separate possible edits, not one edit...