Imminent_vore and vore are not the same thing.

Vore is the current action taking place, while imminent implies it is about to. I have seen this countless times, here are some examples: (To be fair, I've placed here pictures that have been here at least a year)

https://e621.net/post/show/1389983/2017-ambiguous_gender-dialogue-drooling-english_te

https://e621.net/post/show/1415157/2018-3_toes-5_fingers-absurd_res-alpha_channel-ant

https://e621.net/post/show/1418928/backsack-balls-black_hair-black_nose-blue_eyes-blu

All of these have one thing in common, there is no vore happening at the moment. Rather irritating for some.

There is no quarrel with the taggers, artists, and/or uploaders, especially because I don't edit tags much, if at all, meaning I have no right to be picky, but this differentiation is a key factor in determining what's in the picture.

It's rather annoying at times, again, no one's fault but mine to think so, but these two tags should not be on the same picture unless applicable, i.e. comics, multiple panels, it's shown someone having already been eaten, a part of someone's body clearly shown in mouth/lodged in throat, etc..

However, in the situation of vore having happened already, post_vore must have the tag vore because it has happened, and is likely continuing to happen, which is where the blacklist may become useless, like if someone has vore blacklisted but did not know that post_vore exists, and then they've lost whatever boner they were trying to achieve. (I am a vore fan myself so I do not have this problem, but noting it made sense.)

What type of vore does not matter until it is occurring or has occurred; And it would be somewhat pointless to put the type of vore in the case of no vore occurring, but imminent_vore has been placed. Luckily there are only a couple of these.

Anyone think the same?

If this has been discussed before, please let me know, so I may delete this if necessary.

Twines said:
If this has been discussed before, please let me know, so I may delete this if necessary.

https://e621.net/forum/show/228495

i would be in favor for un-implicating them, but the problem is that people who hate vore will likely throw a shit fit if imminent vore pics start showing up despite of blacklisting vore.

oh and also the first one doesnt even qualify for imminent vore tag. its just a mouth shot

Cane751 said:
https://e621.net/forum/show/228495

Would it be appropriate to delete this post then?

Ruikuli said:
i would be in favor for un-implicating them, but the problem is that people who hate vore will likely throw a shit fit if imminent vore pics start showing up despite of blacklisting vore.

oh and also the first one doesnt even qualify for imminent vore tag. its just a mouth shot

This makes sense, however, sometimes people don't realize the imminent_vore tag is there so they may still like the image, even if it doesn't look completely obvious that it is imminent. Both of these things happen though so I don't know what a possible solution could be.

The first picture is probably incorrectly tagged. The other two examples should be good though.

Could we have two tags? One for the event of actual ongoing vore, and one umbrella tag for the fetish, implied by all vore related tags?

MyNameIsOver20charac said:
Could we have two tags? One for the event of actual ongoing vore, and one umbrella tag for the fetish, implied by all vore related tags?

voreaphilia? its aliased away atm but it could work. it could cover also stuff like fetishy mouth shots, imminent vore, actual vore and post vore. makes blacklisting and searching lot easier