Woah, more?! Yup. (Again, some of these might be obvious, but I'd like to verify my thoughts on these with those whom are more knowledgeable).

If a post contains a creature like a Renamon, Zoroark, Gardevoir etc..., creatures that look anthro-like by default, do you tag posts as "anthro" or "feral"? A follow-up question, when does "feral" become "anthro" in this case?

A related-question, would characters like an un-anthrofied Bowser be classified as "feral"?

A character is masturbating. Another walks in on them, and you see them via a cutaway, the tags "duo" and "solo_focus" apply, right?

A character is thinking about another character via a thought bubble or something, does this count as "duo" or is it still "solo"?

Interesting question this one: A post contains a solo ambiguous-looking character. But the poster, let's say the creator of the image, tags it as "female". Do I remove the "female" tag and apply "ambiguous_gender"?

Should "gender_focus" apply to "duo_focus"? Like for example, a picture containing group sex, but it clearly highlights two characters, a male and a female. And if "yes", should both "male_focus" and "female_focus" alongside "duo_focus" apply?

Does a tag exist for robots being penetrated or penetrating? Like "robot_penetrating_robot" or something like that? I mean characters that aren't anthrofied like in this picture.
post #1786699

Here's a weird one I just thought of: Let's say there's two characters conjoined, a male and a female, and then they get fucked by another male, would both "male_penetrated" and "female_penetrated" apply?

Kinda relating to my last post, some penetration questions:

If a character is fingering another's urethra, does "gender_penetrating" still apply? Again, it's probably "yes" but just making sure.

If a character is inserting their tongue into another's vagina, anus, urethra, etc..., does this count as "gender_penetrating"?

Final question: Which do you prefer: small_dom_big_sub or big_dom_small_sub?
I like the latter, but greatly prefer the former.

(Also, I'm sorry for all of these posts about tagging if it's bothering anyone. I do a lot of tagging myself and would like to learn more about it, so I may be able to tag better).

Blacktail51 said:
If a post contains a creature like a Renamon, Zoroark, Gardevoir etc..., creatures that look anthro-like by default, do you tag posts as "anthro" or "feral"? A follow-up question, when does "feral" become "anthro" in this case?

That's a good question. The wiki page for feral does say:

An animal character that is depicted in its natural (real) form.

Ferals usually move on four legs (if they have legs at all), but this category also includes naturally bipedal animals such as kangaroos, birds, and various dinosaurs. In these cases the difference between anthro and feral can be subtle, but can usually be determined from the neck and shoulder shape, and the overall posture.

Emphasis mine. So, assuming animal-based pokemon and digimon count as animals (and at least for pokémon, the wiki for them says they may be tagged with things like canine or rodent as appropriate), ones that are naturally bipedal would technically be feral when not given a more humanoid posture or shape than it normally has. For Gardevoir more specifically, I think humanoid may be more appropriate since it doesn't appear to be based on an animal.

Though I'll leave it to someone with more authority to give a proper answer. I'm curious too.

With fictional species you ignore the lore, and tag what it looks like.
If it looks like an anthro by default, it gets tagged as such (for example lucario or lopunny)
If it looks like feral, it gets tagged as such (for example pidgey and camerupt)
If it looks like humanoid, it gets tagged as such (for example gardevoir and sawk)

And same with waddling heads and such. Of course if artist chooses to draw it with form that is different from from canon form, you tag it what it looks like.

Also for the record if I see anyone try to staple feral or anthro tags on pokemons like gardevoirs, I will personally come ensure that there will be legos for them to step on for every step they take for rest of their life.

I guess now that I think about it, the examples I listed would be tagged as such. When I was writing it at that moment, I was thinking something along the lines of:

"How can I tell the difference?!"

Now, after reading your posts and, y'know, thinking about it, yeah, I made it seem a lot more complicated than it actually was.

hiekkapillu said:
Also for the record if I see anyone try to staple feral or anthro tags on pokemons like gardevoirs, I will personally come ensure that there will be legos for them to step on for every step they take for rest of their life.

Don't worry buddy, I was only using gardevoir as an example. (Since those three were the first three to come to mind). I don't want any legos in my path.