Topic: [APPROVED] ishuzoku_reviewers implications

Posted under General

The bulk update request #55 is active.

create implication stunk (0) -> ishuzoku_reviewers (0)
create implication zel_(ishuzoku_reviewers) (0) -> ishuzoku_reviewers (0)
create implication crimvael (0) -> ishuzoku_reviewers (0)
create implication kanchal (0) -> ishuzoku_reviewers (0)
create implication brooz (0) -> ishuzoku_reviewers (0)
create implication nalgami (0) -> ishuzoku_reviewers (0)
create implication samtahn (0) -> ishuzoku_reviewers (0)
create implication meidri (0) -> ishuzoku_reviewers (0)
create implication death_abyss (2) -> ishuzoku_reviewers (0)
create implication aloe_(ishuzoku_reviewers) (0) -> ishuzoku_reviewers (0)
create implication deta_(ishuzoku_reviewers) (0) -> ishuzoku_reviewers (0)
create implication eldri (0) -> ishuzoku_reviewers (0)
create implication elza_(ishuzoku_reviewers) (0) -> ishuzoku_reviewers (0)
create implication guinea_(ishuzoku_reviewers) (0) -> ishuzoku_reviewers (0)
create implication lona (0) -> ishuzoku_reviewers (0)
create implication lymee (0) -> ishuzoku_reviewers (0)
create implication mii_(ishuzoku_reviewers) (0) -> ishuzoku_reviewers (0)
create implication milky_(ishuzoku_reviewers) (0) -> ishuzoku_reviewers (0)
create implication mitsue_(ishuzoku_reviewers) (0) -> ishuzoku_reviewers (0)
create implication ocpa (0) -> ishuzoku_reviewers (0)
create implication piltia (0) -> ishuzoku_reviewers (0)
create implication tiaplate (0) -> ishuzoku_reviewers (0)
create implication virgin_(ishuzoku_reviewers) (0) -> ishuzoku_reviewers (0)
create implication eyesha_(ishuzoku_reviewers) (0) -> ishuzoku_reviewers (0)
create implication dely_(ishuzoku_reviewers) (0) -> ishuzoku_reviewers (0)
create implication mimilo_(ishuzoku_reviewers) (0) -> ishuzoku_reviewers (0)
create implication ice_(ishuzoku_reviewers) (0) -> ishuzoku_reviewers (0)
create implication mig_(ishuzoku_reviewers) (0) -> ishuzoku_reviewers (0)
create implication lambert_(ishuzoku_reviewers) (0) -> ishuzoku_reviewers (0)
create implication elma_(ishuzoku_reviewers) (0) -> ishuzoku_reviewers (0)

Reason: Some of the characters show up a decent amount to warrant an implication, and might as well go for the whole pile. (Just listed what was on ishuzoku_reviewers + what was mentioned below, hopefully nothing's missing.)

EDIT: The bulk update request #55 (forum #290911) has been approved by @Millcore.

Updated by auto moderator

blind_guardian said:
guinea shouldn't be implicated and should instead be guinea_(ishuzoku_reviewers)

I wasn't sure about that myself, but since the tag was already in use like that I didn't want to change it on my own. No objections from me.

  • 1