Created for transparency compliance with NotMeNotYou. (I apologize if I misunderstood).
Which cubs are most attractive in your opinion? I like the Chipettes, Tails, Amanda Scratch, and Rocketgirl. Also big fan of Sweetiebelle.
Updated by Millcore
Topic: Your Picks For Most Attractive Cubs
Posted under General
This topic has been locked.
I think, you got that message completely backwards.
I agree with NMNY here. Let's not go where this is headed.
bitwolfy said:
I think, you got that message completely backwards.I agree with NMNY here. Let's not go where this is headed.
That’s fine, but why? Seriously? This is a major site that hosts cub porn.
sammytheseal said:
That’s fine, but why? Seriously? This is a major site that hosts cub porn.
https://e621.net/forum_topics/27973?page=1#forum_post_300314
thegreatwolfgang said:
https://e621.net/forum_topics/27973?page=1#forum_post_300314
I didn’t ask anyone how they felt about the kink. That’s unrelated to the thread.
sammytheseal said:
I didn’t ask anyone how they felt about the kink. That’s unrelated to the thread.
When people click under the pretense of "who do they find cute" and see that the thread's about "who do you wanna fuck" then you're going to get a lot of heated/opinionated posts, regardless of your intentions.
sammytheseal said:
I didn’t ask anyone how they felt about the kink. That’s unrelated to the thread.
I agree with the users who have already spoken on this topic,
and also agree with the admin NotMeNotYou said :
If a thread turns into TMI it will get locked before I need to bring out records.
The topic was locked because it was necessary.
Then, why don't you ask that admin?
Updated
sirbrownbear said:
When people click under the pretense of "who do they find cute" and see that the thread's about "who do you wanna fuck" then you're going to get a lot of heated/opinionated posts, regardless of your intentions.
Which is why I created this post to avoid that, Why are we talking about the other thread when I created this thread to address that problem?
Updated
kurogi_hbfoxsiv said:
I agree with the users who have already spoken on this topic,
and also agree with the admin NotMeNotYou said :
If a thread turns into TMI it will get locked before I need to bring out records.The topic was locked because it was necessary.
Then, why don't you ask that admin?
Simple names of cubs that someone finds attractive is not TMI.
sammytheseal said: Simple names of cubs that someone finds attractive is not TMI.
Proudly announcing that you find cubs attractive is.
https://e621.net/wiki_pages/1638#Creepy
Creepy Comments
Creating forum posts, threads, or comments that cause an unpleasant feeling of fear or unease, or are sexually inappropriate
This is intended to ensure that users do not express their personal fetishes/desires publicly.
Users have the right, within realistic expectations, to browse comfortably without unneeded or unnecessary commentary of those who wish to express their desires.
You already have a record for breaking that rule in that other thread from a while back. Are you trying to earn another one?
bitwolfy said:
Proudly announcing that you find cubs attractive is.https://e621.net/wiki_pages/1638#Creepy
You already have a record for breaking that rule in that other thread from a while back. Are you trying to earn another one?
Well, I disagree with your threatening tone, as coercion is not a means for me to do something. But nevertheless, for the sake of the actual policy, I’ll cease and desist or what have you. I won’t make any more posts like this, or “creepy” posts. That’s fine. I’ll comply. Just know that these rules are extremely arbitrary, and that it’s plainly ironic when furries who draw or host depictions of the most disturbing and controversial things imaginable try to claim that vaguely expressing a fetish (I’m referring to this post specifically) is somehow comparatively creepy. They act as if the creation of NSFW cub art isn’t nearly always itself an expression of someone’s fetish, be it an artist or commissioner. I have yet to hear a convincing argument in favor of this double standard.
sammytheseal said:
Well, I disagree with your threatening tone, as coercion is not a means for me to do something. But nevertheless, for the sake of the actual policy, I’ll cease and desist or what have you. I won’t make any more posts like this, or “creepy” posts. That’s fine. I’ll comply. Just know that these rules are extremely arbitrary, and that it’s plainly ironic when furries who draw or host depictions of the most disturbing and controversial things imaginable try to claim that vaguely expressing a fetish (I’m referring to this post specifically) is somehow comparatively creepy. They act as if the creation of NSFW cub art isn’t nearly always itself an expression of someone’s fetish, be it an artist or commissioner. I have yet to hear a convincing argument in favor of this double standard.
e621 is for the pictures, not the comments. you can chat as much as you want about this stuff over on inkbunny or whatever.
Additionally, the “creepy comments” rule seems to be almost solely enforced against the “yuck” factor of the acting admin. The rule about not revealing fetishes seems to be directly contradicted by this forum post.
https://e621.net/forum_topics/24698?page=1
Why is expressing a cub fetish wrong, but this has been okay for four years? This is precisely what I’m talking about. I see users appealing to an objective standard which doesn’t seem to exist in reality or in practice.
sammytheseal said:
Why is expressing a cub fetish wrong, but this has been okay for four years?
It might be the way you word things.
When your threads make me uneasy I usually just assume I'm overreacting, but when SirBrownBear thinks you're pushing boundaries talking about cub I'm inclined to believe I'm not just imagining it.
magnuseffect said:
It might be the way you word things.
When your threads make me uneasy I usually just assume I'm overreacting, but when SirBrownBear thinks you're pushing boundaries talking about cub I'm inclined to believe I'm not just imagining it.
I literally said a few names of cubs I thought were attractive. In my other post I said I was a “sucker” for one character. That’s legitimately the full extent of what I said. That’s simply extremely mild compared to the other thread, wherein turn-ons are explicitly described. It cannot be denied. You can read both posts and see this clearly. I’m sorry, but it’s simply a double standard.
sammytheseal said:
Well, I disagree with your threatening tone, as coercion is not a means for me to do something. But nevertheless, for the sake of the actual policy, I’ll cease and desist or what have you. I won’t make any more posts like this, or “creepy” posts. That’s fine. I’ll comply. Just know that these rules are extremely arbitrary, and that it’s plainly ironic when furries who draw or host depictions of the most disturbing and controversial things imaginable try to claim that vaguely expressing a fetish (I’m referring to this post specifically) is somehow comparatively creepy. They act as if the creation of NSFW cub art isn’t nearly always itself an expression of someone’s fetish, be it an artist or commissioner. I have yet to hear a convincing argument in favor of this double standard.
It's not a threat - I am not trying to backseat moderate here. I am simply letting you know what the site policy is
There is no double standard. Users can easily filter out images that they find offensive using the blacklist. Barring an occasional mistagging incident, this means that they will never see that kind of content.
On the other hand, it is not possible to hide disturbing comments and forum threads. Thus, the existence of a policy that forbids them.