Posted under General
Given concepts like candy gore there might be some merit in making specific goreless_(x) and bloodless_(x) tags, but, also, tagging ear penetration as bloodless/goreless (post #3816674) isn't interesting because most instances of it are already bloodless/goreless (ear_penetration ~blood ~gore.)
Even if somebody wants to keep these tags, they need some workshopping.
Since they're "for situations where you would expect blood/gore, but it isn't present", they're not exactly the negation of the blood and gore tags. Like when there's no blood despite an arm getting cut off. Other tags like no_underwear have similar uses, they're not for images that simply don't have the thing, but don't have them when they're expected.
If there's significant mistags and they're used a lot where blood/gore are not expected, then maybe invalidation or something is warranted.
watsit said:
Since they're "for situations where you would expect blood/gore, but it isn't present", they're not exactly the negation of the blood and gore tags. Like when there's no blood despite an arm getting cut off. Other tags like no_underwear have similar uses, they're not for images that simply don't have the thing, but don't have them when they're expected.
Its not very descriptive. I know what you mean, but a tag to describe body part removal fetishes without the obvious implication of decapitation or gore would be better and less likely to be mistagged by anybody.
I can't come up with a good name for that hypothetical tag however, but anything that those arbitrarily named tags describe can be described without them. Instead of goreless, let's use something like 'detachable_limbs' and 'synthetic_body'. Perhaps you can give me some ideas?
If there's significant mistags and they're used a lot where blood/gore are not expected, then maybe invalidation or something is warranted.
I'm on board!
