I'm asking because I've been noticing an upswing in 'neko on human' art. Like, a guy or girl (or both) with the bare minimum of JUST horns, or JUST cat/fox ears & a tail on an otherwise human character.
Like, does that count as 'furry enough', since pure human on human art gets removed? Because it feels like kind of a cheat to get around the 'no human-only art' rule.
Should I be reporting them for review? Because I have not in case they are allowed.

I know 'neko' is probably not the most accurate term, but it's basically 'human-on-human (with horns!)' or 'human on human (with fuzzy ears & sometimes a tail!)'.

(EXAMPLES ARE 18+)
Like here:
https://static1.e621.net/data/00/3c/003ce5c71c6b638ffad358e2dd058057.png

And here:
https://static1.e621.net/data/26/0d/260dcfe8161a343ab392dcfb703617f4.jpg

How are either of those furry? But I'd rather ask instead of flag & be wrong.

https://e621.net/wiki_pages/11143#humans

Ultimately, it's up to the janitors reviewing them to decide whether or not they should stay.
If it has already been approved, then you should NOT be flagging them.

thegreatwolfgang said:
https://e621.net/wiki_pages/11143#humans

Ultimately, it's up to the janitors reviewing them to decide whether or not they should stay.
If it has already been approved, then you should NOT be flagging them.

Fair enough.

The "Accurate term" you're looking for is "kemonomimi," which is aliased to animal humanoid.

The ones without any clear animal features (just horns, humanoid pointy ears, etc.) are not furry, but they are still site-relevant and should not be reported.