Topic: Funky tipped doggy dicks

Posted under General

Thinking of making a tag for canine penises with heads. It's very common, sometimes attributable to style, sometimes to trying to anthropomorphize canine penises.
It ranges from just emphasizing a distinction between the tip and the shaft:
post #4768084
...to a full glans:
post #176726
...and a bit of stuff in-between:
post #4602838 post #3047054

It's different from knotted_humanoid_penis since it's still mostly shaped and textured like a canine penis.

I have a couple names I'm thinking of for this.
canine_penis_with_glans/glansed_canine_penis: pretty clear, it doesn't leave a lot of room for grey area or edge cases. Also it's technically inaccurate since the entire visible part of a canine penis is a glans.
headed_canine_penis/canine_penis_with_head: this is less clear, but gives more room for various styles and weird things.
thick-tipped_canine_penis: the least clear and potentially most problematic.

strikerman said:
The glans wiki current has:
...
Doesn't really apply to the stylized penises here

I do believe that it still gets tagged on penises other than humanoid; e.g., spiked_glans -humanoid_penis.
(Note: I skipped using plain glans as there were too many posts missing the humanoid_penis tag).

regsmutt said:
Many of those results are stuff like this:
post #4758049
You'd have to add -humanoid_penis which would eliminate stuff like this:
post #4481120
I assume this is also why knotted_humanoid_penis and barbed_canine_penis exist.

While the two tags mentioned are quite common search terms, I don't really see the need for a glansed_*_penis tag.
Is there a large interest in it or is it going to be used for blacklisting? Will there also be a glansed_feline_penis, etc.?

thegreatwolfgang said:
I do believe that it still gets tagged on penises other than humanoid; e.g., spiked_glans -humanoid_penis.
(Note: I skipped using plain glans as there were too many posts missing the humanoid_penis tag).

While the two tags mentioned are quite common search terms, I don't really see the need for a glansed_*_penis tag.
Is there a large interest in it or is it going to be used for blacklisting? Will there also be a glansed_feline_penis, etc.?

I do think it's useful for searching and blacklisting since it separates out "more feral" dicks from ones that are more 'hybrid', which is something I've seen people express an interest in.
I also figured this would be useful because while adding missing canine_penis tags I noticed that it seems some people are iffy on tagging these as canine_penis. It gives another option than knotted_humanoid_penis which doesn't apply here.

regsmutt said:
I do think it's useful for searching and blacklisting since it separates out "more feral" dicks from ones that are more 'hybrid', which is something I've seen people express an interest in.
I also figured this would be useful because while adding missing canine_penis tags I noticed that it seems some people are iffy on tagging these as canine_penis. It gives another option than knotted_humanoid_penis which doesn't apply here.

What makes a canine_penis "more feral"? The lack of a enlarged tip?
post #4151688
Looking at this canine penis tutorial, I can say that a few of these realistic penises do have an enlarged tip, though not to the extent that it could be considered to be glans.
From the examples you have given in your first comment, I could say 3 out of 4 already fall into this category.

thegreatwolfgang said:
What makes a canine_penis "more feral"? The lack of a enlarged tip?
post #4151688
Looking at this canine penis tutorial, I can say that a few of these realistic penises do have an enlarged tip, though not to the extent that it could be considered to be glans.
From the examples you have given in your first comment, I could say 3 out of 4 already fall into this category.

A couple of those in the bottom right corner are very exaggerated. I wouldn't call them "less feral" though. Personally, just having an enlarged tip isn't where I'd draw the line, even ones that are more 'human' shaped, since imo that's where you'd run into issues with style and angles.
I do though think there's some utility in covering instances where the tip is drawn glans-like either by emphasizing an edge/fold around the tip:
post #4747130
or by having contours that create a kind of 'phantom glans':
post #4602838

But just covering the most clear-cut "yep that's a pointy human glans" cases is perfectly adequate.

  • 1