Hello, everyone. A lot of the Father of the Pride characters have fairly common names: Larry, Kate, Sierra, Hunter, Victoria, Blake, etc.

But tagging something as character:hunter makes a simple "hunter" tag... and otherwise, the character section of the tags looks like this:

hunter_(father_of_the_pride)
kate_(father_of_the_pride)
larry_(father_of_the_pride)
sarmoti_(father_of_the_pride)
sierra_(father_of_the_pride)

I'm trying to get it to a simple, easy to search standard for the names that isn't too complex. Some posts are tagged "hunter_(lion)" and some characters, such as "Sierra" for example, have multiple characters from different series using the same name.

Should I go with the longer tags that include the series name in parenthesis for all of them? Would tags like "character:hunter_(fotp)" be better?

Violet said:
Hello, everyone. A lot of the Father of the Pride characters have fairly common names: Larry, Kate, Sierra, Hunter, Victoria, Blake, etc.

But tagging something as character:hunter makes a simple "hunter" tag... and otherwise, the character section of the tags looks like this:

hunter_(father_of_the_pride)
kate_(father_of_the_pride)
larry_(father_of_the_pride)
sarmoti_(father_of_the_pride)
sierra_(father_of_the_pride)

I'm trying to get it to a simple, easy to search standard for the names that isn't too complex. Some posts are tagged "hunter_(lion)" and some characters, such as "Sierra" for example, have multiple characters from different series using the same name.

Should I go with the longer tags that include the series name in parenthesis for all of them? Would tags like "character:hunter_(fotp)" be better?

fotp sounds fine, since that's what we've done with MLP; just make sure to put in implication requests for each of the tags to Father of the Pride, whatever that is.

I'd approve it since the names are otherwise very generic