Implicating Chromamancer -> detailed_background.

Reason: HAVE YOU SEEN THEIR ART?!

I've already added it to current images, but good freaking lord.... @_@

(And yes, this is a bit of a joke post, trying to get people to look at the art more. My god is it beautiful....)

HOW DARE YOU MAKE A MOCKERY OF THE FORUM
BAN BAN BAN BAN

What is this? An individual fooling around with serious business? When i get you i'll... that is some mighty fine artwork right there! Okay, i will not slip loose the hounds of war upon you this time, but i will keep my eye on you, young man / woman.
/Sarcasm XD

can't talk, busy staring at art <3

You're assuming all art by him is going to have a detailed background. Might not always be the case. Same reason we don't implicate character tags to a gender, because that character isn't always going to show up as that gender in every single image.

....-.- *slaps tony upside the head* do more than read the title.

I didn't take "bit of a joke post" to mean "this thread is 100% not serious".

Even then, no, the implication obviously won't be added.