yeah

I don't think Cum_in_mouth should be the same tag as cum_inside. But I wish there was a cum_into_mouth tag.

BudFisk said:
I don't think Cum_in_mouth should be the same tag as cum_inside.

I said imply, not alias.

But I wish there was a cum_into_mouth tag.

....so basically... cumming_in_mouth?

....so basically... cumming_in_mouth?

probably. too drunk to know

BudFisk said:
probably. too drunk to know

lol

I don't think the rough sex part makes sense. You can tag violent/degrading images with rough, which isn't exactly the same thing as rough sex. You start to have an imbalanced overlap.

Same with the cum in mouth, it's not the same as cumming inside any part.

The tags work best when they let someone locate content by their context. We don't want to muddle the tags with nonspecific context! Not only is that slightly disorganized, but users would likely start stumbling on content they did NOT want to see.

Which is why implications were suggested, and not aliases.

Celice said:
I don't think the rough sex part makes sense. You can tag violent/degrading images with rough, which isn't exactly the same thing as rough sex. You start to have an imbalanced overlap.

Violent/degrading isn't really the corret term here. If someone is being stabbed or shot, that's being rough? Sounds more like being violent and homicidal. But that's beside the point.

Same with the cum in mouth, it's not the same as cumming inside any part.

It's pretty much exactly the same thing as the others.
cum in mouth -> the presence of cum inside someone's mouth
cum in ass -> the presence of cum inside someone's anus
cum in pussy -> the presence of cum inside someone's vagina

The tags work best when they let someone locate content by their context. We don't want to muddle the tags with nonspecific context! Not only is that slightly disorganized, but users would likely start stumbling on content they did NOT want to see.

I didn't say they were the same, I said they necessitated the respective tags. >_>