Topic: Tag Implication: group_masturbation -> masturbation

Posted under Tag Alias and Implication Suggestions

Genjar

Former Staff

Yeah, a whole lot of those seem to be duos. So no implication to group, that'd result in too many mistags.

Updated by anonymous

I've tagged about half of this tag. Despite the wiki I wrote for it, I also tagged it on posts that take place after group_masturbation, as implied by cum_on_self or cum_on_ground: post #680402 post #559081 post #405588 post #305759 post #785503 post #997353. The first four of these pictures wouldn't work with this implication. You'd have to remove these types of pictures to get the implication to work...

And, yes, the name is a misnomer: it doesn't actually require a group. We can re-name it if that's too confusing (masturbating_together?).

Updated by anonymous

  • 1