Topic: Tag Suggestion: smaller_ambiguous/larger_ambiguous

Posted under General

I've noticed that there is no smaller or larger tags for characters of ambiguous gender. Would it be justified to create these tags for the purpose of comprehensive tagging of size_difference posts, or is this too small a case to account for?

Updated by titanmelon

Genjar

Former Staff

Would anyone actually search for those? If not, there's no reason to tag them.
Unlike the other gender tags, ambiguous_gender exists mainly for the tagging and sorting purposes. And I can't think of any tagging projects where those would be useful, since wildcards can't be used to exclude posts (example: size_difference -smaller_* just searches for 'size_difference').

Updated by anonymous

Genjar

Former Staff

Qmannn said:
I have seen some people who have a preference for those of an ambiguous gender

Good enough reason to tag them, then.
I don't remember ever seeing anyone mention that they specifically search for ambiguous, but it sounds plausible enough.

Updated by anonymous

Sounds good, matches with the other [size]_[gender] pairs

-

Genjar said:
Good enough reason to tag them, then.
I don't remember ever seeing anyone mention that they specifically search for ambiguous, but it sounds plausible enough.

I do :v

It's a good way to search for gendered posts too, at least where size differences are concerned

foo -smaller_ambguous/larger_ambiguous

Updated by anonymous

  • 1