Topic: Tag Implication: erection -> penis

Posted under Tag Alias and Implication Suggestions

GDelscribe said:
What about erect_clitoris?

I think erect_clitoris would be enough as it is and doesn't need an erection tag as well

Updated by anonymous

I don't think the wiki is entirely accurate. Erection under clothes, which implicates to erection, certainly does not imply that the penis is visible. Similarly with penis outline, which will often be accompanied by tags as though the penis was fully visible.

Updated by anonymous

erection can be visible without penis itself being visible. this is exactly why the erection -> penis implication was deleted some time ago

Updated by anonymous

Mutisija said:
erection can be visible without penis itself being visible. this is exactly why the erection -> penis implication was deleted some time ago

But... how? Oh, right. Clothes.

Updated by anonymous

Mutisija said:
erection can be visible without penis itself being visible. this is exactly why the erection -> penis implication was deleted some time ago

Wouldn't just tenting be enough in that case?

I do see your point though so I guess that's fair.

Updated by anonymous

  • 1