Implicating erection → penis
Link to implication
Reason:
Quote from the erection wiki:
"A character with a visibly stiff penis."
So I believe there can not be an erection without a penis.
Updated
Posted under Tag Alias and Implication Suggestions
Implicating erection → penis
Link to implication
Quote from the erection wiki:
"A character with a visibly stiff penis."
So I believe there can not be an erection without a penis.
Updated
What about erect_clitoris?
Updated by anonymous
GDelscribe said:
What about erect_clitoris?
I think erect_clitoris would be enough as it is and doesn't need an erection tag as well
Updated by anonymous
I don't think the wiki is entirely accurate. Erection under clothes, which implicates to erection, certainly does not imply that the penis is visible. Similarly with penis outline, which will often be accompanied by tags as though the penis was fully visible.
Updated by anonymous
erection can be visible without penis itself being visible. this is exactly why the erection -> penis implication was deleted some time ago
Updated by anonymous
Mutisija said:
erection can be visible without penis itself being visible. this is exactly why the erection -> penis implication was deleted some time ago
But... how? Oh, right. Clothes.
Updated by anonymous