Posted under Tag Alias and Implication Suggestions
Aliasing areola_slip → nipple_slip
Link to alias
nipple_slip includes areola_slip in its definition. Technically this should be an implication, but most users tag areola_slip as nipple_slip anyway and I'm not sure it's a useful distinction to have (30 posts vs. 1100).
Updated by Peekaboo
-1. Areolas aren't always present in characters who have nipples, and areolas slipping doesn't mean the nipples are.
Updated by anonymous
These seem distinct enough to warrant separate tags. How many areola slip posts are currently tagged nipple_slip? If it's not a lot, then I think the nipple_slip wiki should be changed so the definition doesn't include areola slips.
Updated by anonymous
Furrin_Gok said:
Areolas aren't always present in characters who have nipples
I know, but that's how the tag is defined.
Maxpizzle said:
These seem distinct enough to warrant separate tags.
How many areola slip posts are currently tagged nipple_slip?
Conceptually yes but in practice no.
Based on a semi-random sample (n=15), 40% of nipple_slip posts are actually areola_slips. The nipple/areola distinction is poorly maintained and this particular subcategory is not worth keeping.
Updated by anonymous
-1 from me.
Updated by anonymous
