Topic: Implication Issues

Posted under Tag Alias and Implication Suggestions

Ok so. Noticed an issue with post #569923
Warning: contains castration and cbt.

Because he has a clit I tagged it as such a long time ago. But there's no visible pussy here. Its a sheath. (He has complicated intersex anatomy.)

That said due to clitoris being implicated to pussy it's impossible to remove the pussy tag.

What do I do in this instance?

Updated by Darou

imo it looks more like some sort of cockring around base of penis rather than sheath with clitoris. but anyways it its possible to have visible clitoris without rest of the junk being visible so unimplication could be useful.

Updated by anonymous

Esp with internal/cross section views or things where we can only see the clit or intersex characters who have unique configurations. While the implication is handy for lazy tagging it's not always as effective as it should be perhaps

Updated by anonymous

Genjar

Former Staff

That does look like a clitoris to me. And then there's rare cases of hyper clitoris peeking out from underwear, which gets incorrectly implicated as pussy. Genital slits can also have a visible clitoris, which is an another reason why that should be unimplicated.

Updated by anonymous

Does look like a clit to me as well. worth noting that it is a feature fairly common among "Living Gasm Drive's"

+1 for removing implication

Updated by anonymous

  • 1