Implicating panties_aside → underwear_aside
Link to implication
Reason:
Same process as for the clothing_lift suggestion.
Also:
* bra_lift → underwear_aside
* fundoshi_aside → underwear_aside
* jockstrap_aside → underwear_aside
* underwear_aside → clothing_aside (this tag could use a review. There's often lots of stuff that should use other tags)
* loincloth_aside → clothing_aside
* swimsuit_aside → clothing_aside (maybe this should be renamed swimwear_aside to more clearly include male swimwear?)
* leotard_aside → clothing_aside
* shorts_aside → clothing_aside (that one tends to accumulate stuff that should use other tags, though)
penis_through_leghole cannot quite be implicated, because it is often just a vpl and the leg is not always "aside" either.
I have depopulated pants_aside, which could probably be aliased to invalid_tag, since they were systematically an idiosyncratic use for another tag (usually pants_down or open_fly and in one case easy_access).
[1] E.g. post #696502 and post #697414.
Updated by Googlipod