Topic: Multi implications to clothing_aside

Posted under Tag Alias and Implication Suggestions

Implicating panties_aside → underwear_aside
Link to implication

Reason:

Same process as for the clothing_lift suggestion.
Also:

* bra_lift → underwear_aside
* fundoshi_aside → underwear_aside
* jockstrap_aside → underwear_aside
* underwear_aside → clothing_aside (this tag could use a review. There's often lots of stuff that should use other tags)
* loincloth_aside → clothing_aside
* swimsuit_aside → clothing_aside (maybe this should be renamed swimwear_aside to more clearly include male swimwear?)
* leotard_aside → clothing_aside
* shorts_aside → clothing_aside (that one tends to accumulate stuff that should use other tags, though)

penis_through_leghole cannot quite be implicated, because it is often just a vpl and the leg is not always "aside" either.

I have depopulated pants_aside, which could probably be aliased to invalid_tag, since they were systematically an idiosyncratic use for another tag (usually pants_down or open_fly and in one case easy_access).

[1] E.g. post #696502 and post #697414.

Updated by Googlipod

Genjar said:
I'm against the creation of clothing_aside tag, since it seems identical to partially_clothed.

Really? these form a pretty well-defined set of tags and a reasonable way to group them sounds entire appropriate to me.

Updated by anonymous

Genjar

Former Staff

Circeus said:
Really? these form a pretty well-defined set of tags and a reasonable way to group them sounds entire appropriate to me.

But there's no point in having two tags for the same thing, and aliasing partially_clothed to clothing_aside would break the current fully_clothed/partially_clothed > clothed group.

The reason we went with that tag in the first place was because *_aside tags tends to be all over the place, sometimes even mistagged for clothing that's simply lying aside on the ground. Whereas *_clothed makes it clear that it should only be tagged if it's being worn.

Updated by anonymous

Anything changed? Because I tried to make an implication myself only to be told that one already exists.

What I was also going to put:

Also imply:
underwear_aside → clothing_aside
loincloth_aside → clothing_aside
swimsuit_aside → clothing_aside
shorts_aside → clothing_aside
thong_aside → underwear_aside
bikini_aside → swimsuit_aside
jockstrap_aside → underwear_aside

Alias:
panties_pulled_aside → panties_aside
swimwear_aside → swimsuit_aside
panties_moved_aside → panties_aside

Updated by anonymous

  • 1