Implicating bondage_gloves → bondage_gear
Link to implication

Reason:

why this has hasnt been implicated yet i wouldnt know but bondage gloves or mittens are bondage gear.

Additionally implicate this to gloves

Related and/or a cause: forum #200571

Chessax said:
Related and/or a cause: forum #200571

Forgot about that, i did see that when i first started posting here. all around good but id prefer the use of gloves over mittens in any proposed tag for those since the former is more widely known and understood for what it would look like.

PS:Also note on your mention of monoglove, it does not actually seem to be the same as bondage gloves, as such nether implication or alias would have worked as i assume was the point as to why you mentioned it in the other thread. Both could be implicated to armbinder but both cant to each other
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Armbinder

Chessax said:
Or if neither is good enough: How about a compromise and moving both to something like bondage_mitts or bondage_mittens? Monoglove would be nice but that's mainly used for armbinder.

Speaking of which, another alias suggestion:
monoglove -> armbinder

@R'D:
I'm not in favor of any term, so that's fine, just threw hypothetical words around.

I never suggested using monoglove as a term for bondage_gloves; I pretty much disregarded that in the same sentence I mentioned it. Read what I wrote not what you think I wrote. However the aliasing maybe was too harsh and it should have been an implication instead.

Personally I'd keep armbinder separate from bondage_gloves due to their distinct appearance, but it might not be possible to keep bondage_gloves clean.