Aftermath is currently aliased to after_sex, but there are aftermaths of things other than sex, e.g.

post #509369

And something like post #712484 is so remote from the sex that after_sex hardly feels like an appropriate tag for it.

so...have the alias changed to an implication?

Circeus said:
post #509369

science is fun. :P

treos said:
so...have the alias changed to an implication?

science is fun. :P

more then likly a disambiguation actually. a implication is not viable as something nonsexual is still connected to the sex which is the reason for this proposal.

"AFter sex" is tagged as aftersex so it's weird that aftermath implies sex.

Furrin_Gok said:
"AFter sex" is tagged as aftersex so it's weird that aftermath implies sex.

erm... "aftersex" ias another tag aliased to after_sex ("post-sex" is the third one, FWIW).

Circeus said:
erm... "aftersex" ias another tag aliased to after_sex ("post-sex" is the third one, FWIW).

Okay, so why is aftermath aliased to it? Aftermath occurs for tons of things that aren't sex.

Aftermath seems like a pointless tag to me, while after_sex has some legitimate use.

Aftermath is too vague to ever be worth searching for. You will not get any sort of consistent results from it, and it is not useful for searching for specific images.

All it would do does is add to the load of pointless tags that are inconsistently applied and almost never searched for, taking focus away from more important tags.

Why not just make it go the opposite direction? Like having after_sex imply aftermath, but not the other way around?