Here is the site's very own high-scores. If your on one or more of these lists. then you are officially awesome.

woo :V

Only 9102... I guess there were some deletions...

riversyde you are such a badass

It doesn't count, accepting aliases/implications gives you thousands of free tag edits :(

tony311 said:
It doesn't count, accepting aliases/implications gives you thousands of free tag edits :(

stfu tony i'm awesome

Alright! Third place for Wiki Edits!

tony311 said:
It doesn't count, accepting aliases/implications gives you thousands of free tag edits :(

It's not a race :/

Should be careful with these kind of list because people will start to mass upload/edit/comment only to get the top 1 on the list and neglect their uploads.

Neitsuke said:
Should be careful with these kind of list because people will start to mass upload/edit/comment only to get the top 1 on the list and neglect their uploads.

Well darling, if they do decide to edit often, and really do an oustanding job, then what quite simply is the problem?

Hooray!! After today's work session, I've taken SECOND PLACE in the Wikipedia Category.

I feel super motivated now. Tomorrow, I'll take first. And I'm not stopping there. I'll keep going until every tag has a wikipedia page!

I'm more than a little amused by the fact that annotating one image put me in the top-100 note editors.

Snowy said:
I'm more than a little amused by the fact that annotating one image put me in the top-100 note editors.

More sad than amusing. We need more productive note-making people!

It made me realise that i have been slacking off for far too long. I should do something productive with my time, instead of killing hundreds of nazies every day. >_<

Hey, Sly~ You need to update the Wiki Leaderboard.

GUESS WHO TOOK THE LEAD~? :D

I've been slacking.

I'm somehow not surprised that I made the tag list. :P

Princess_Luna said:
Hey, Sly~ You need to update the Wiki Leaderboard.

GUESS WHO TOOK THE LEAD~? :D

there you go gratz on your first place

Well, it's a nice way to make people use their time productively, i suppose. XD

Icedrake201 said:
Well, it's a nice way to make people use their time productively, i suppose. XD

that's the idea

D: I'm TIED with ultimate weapon on uploads?!? I need to work harder...

Not surprised I made the TAG list and the UPLOAD list.

Sticky topic is sticky.
Also, back at number 5 for uploads :D
God help whoever knocks me back down.

UPDATED

My numbers
1 on Note edits
6 on Tag edits
16 on Wiki edits
17 on Uploads

I am still number 1 in note edits and would probably be for a very long time

ippiki_ookami said:
Sticky topic is sticky.
Also, back at number 5 for uploads :D
God help whoever knocks me back down.

Oh, just you wait.

Why isn't this a sticky anymore?

slyroon said:
Why isn't this a sticky anymore?

Probably because improving the site isn't a contest.

null0010 said:
Probably because improving the site isn't a contest.

Maybe not, but users who devote themselves to bettering the site deserve a sticky. Not to mention it gives people who want to compete an easy reference. Stickies don't have to be strictly srs bsns stuff 100% of the time.

Well, I didn't unsticky it so ... yeah.

Unsticked, we don't need people needlessly trying to improve the site for some "score".. that leads to bad things..

Aurali said:
Unsticked, we don't need people needlessly trying to improve the site for some "score".. that leads to bad things..

People are going to do that regardless.

Aurali said:
Unsticked, we don't need people needlessly trying to improve the site for some "score".. that leads to bad things..

How can improving the site, lead to bad things?

slyroon said:
How can improving the site, lead to bad things?

Uploading tons of sub-quality/irrelevant art in an attempt to top the high score, thus making the mods' jobs harder?
Inventing ridiculous tags to try and top the tagging high score?

Test-Subject_217601 said:
Uploading tons of sub-quality/irrelevant art in an attempt to top the high score, thus making the mods' jobs harder?
Inventing ridiculous tags to try and top the tagging high score?

But doesn't people already do that?

But yeah i see your point

slyroon said:
But doesn't people already do that?

But yeah i see your point

Yeah but with an actual high score list it would seem like the mods are condoning it.

I see Rainbow used her forbidden pony voodoo to usurp the #1 spot for tag edits. Yeah no I'm not bitter.

Well you keep making ghost edits to get there

ippiki_ookami said:
I see Rainbow used her forbidden pony voodoo to usurp the #1 spot for tag edits. Yeah no I'm not bitter.

I propose a new category: Oldest necro :o

Oh boy...I just made a snarky reponse to an admin.

Bracing for impact!

I think there should be a distinction between the number of tag changes, and the number of tags changed. Some change one tag, hit enter, and start again; I'm 'stupid' for changing many more on average. Quality or quantity?

Besides, why do admins get the implication tag edits, while they are technically the requester'?I think it'd be more fair.

Asphyxia said:
I think there should be a distinction between the number of tag changes, and the number of tags changed. Some change one tag, hit enter, and start again; I'm 'stupid' for changing many more on average. Quality or quantity?

Technically adding/changing a parent or changing the rating or adding/changing a source will also add to your tag edit count. There are people to do nothing but add sources to images, or make sure things are parented properly or rated properly, and having the amount your tag edit count goes up be dependent on how many tags you changed isn't particularly fair.

And honestly, at the end of the day it's just a measuring stick for our willies.

Asphyxia said:
Some change one tag, hit enter, and start again; I'm 'stupid' for changing many more on average. Quality or quantity?

Actually one tag changes are more often like: enter tag script, click on thumbnails. At least for me, and others priv+ :P
Besides, I don't really think that this is bad that people focus on one wrong tag in many pictures instead of correcting everything on few pictures.

Asphyxia said:
Besides, why do admins get the implication tag edits, while they are technically the requester'?I think it'd be more fair.

This is rather easy to answer, because the approver gets the responsibility about the implication/alias, it also is easier to track down if something needs to be reversed for unfathomed reasons.

Then again, this number is only good to flaunt your e-penis and/or show if someone is active at all.

Asphyxia said:
Some change one tag, hit enter, and start again

So you know my secret...

Asphyxia said:
I think there should be a distinction between the number of tag changes, and the number of tags changed. Some change one tag, hit enter, and start again; I'm 'stupid' for changing many more on average. Quality or quantity?

Besides, why do admins get the implication tag edits, while they are technically the requester'?I think it'd be more fair.

If they were crazy enough to do it, maybe all changes to one pic's tags count as one "edit"?

*shrug* Not that it is important enough to change really, lol

Asphyxia said:
Besides, why do admins get the implication tag edits, while they are technically the requester'?I think it'd be more fair.

I do not know, and I agree.

Gilda_The_Gryphon said:
Actually one tag changes are more often like: enter tag script, click on thumbnails. At least for me, and others priv+ :P
Besides, I don't really think that this is bad that people focus on one wrong tag in many pictures instead of correcting everything on few pictures.

I'm talking about adding ten tags to one picture, by changing it ten times.

There's also no way to list users by their pool edits or forum reply count (P.S. I think I might be winning in the last category :3)

It's a lot more work and time to add tags one at a time instead of multiple tags in the same edit. So if people want to work that hard, and waste that much time, then that's their call. The reality is most taggers end up making multiple tag edits for every "edit" under their name. So the number is more of a symbolic representation than their actual number. The upside is that it usually symbolizes more work than it looks like. The downside is that it goes up more slowly than if it counted every single change separately. That makes it a mystery percentage at best, not literal.

Personally I don't see aliases or implications as rightfully belonged to anybody. One member suggests it. Multiple members discuss it. Multiple admins review it until one makes a decision. One admin may add it to the pending jobs. Another admin might be the one to actually sit through and process the whole implication/alias. So it's a group effort, not easily boiling down to one person's efforts all on their own. In the end it has to be filed under somebody's name. So it might as well go under the name of an admin who might have to revert it in a couple of years anyways. If that's an unfair perk to their numbers, I think they deal with enough of the shitty parts of running the site to earn an unintentional perk or two. It evens out.

And in the end, it really is a e-penis comparison contest. Addicting, but mostly meaningless. I check my numbers because it keeps me motivated. But I don't let it bother me that the tag edit number and the actual amount of tags added aren't the same. At some point, knowing you did a good job, that you made it easier to search for, that you made the site that much better, etc it has to be its own reward. The number is just for fun, not a true measure of how hard you've worked. You know though, if you think that's unfair, you probably shouldn't try source finding or artist identification. Often it's 5-20 minutes of research = one edit. lol Some things just have to be their own reward.

ippiki_ookami said:
I do not know, and I agree.

They belong to the approver because the approver's account is what will commence the tag edits/be credited for them.

Rainbow_Dash said:
They belong to the approver because the approver's account is what will commence the tag edits/be credited for them.

But normal members aren't able to approve them, even if they are as logical as "black_nippless-->nipples". There's no way anyone will disagree on that, unless they want to troll.

Since some of you are into lists: why not make an "upload flagged for deletion (resulting in actual deletion)" list, or a "member, comment or forum post report" list? The latter would probably create some arguments, nobody wants to be known as a 'traitor'.

Asphyxia said:
But normal members aren't able to approve them, even if they are as logical as "black_nippless-->nipples". There's no way anyone will disagree on that, unless they want to troll.

Exactly because of trolls not.
Imagine someone aliasing all genders to each other, the clean up would be pretty horrible if the action would have been spread across multiple accounts.

As I said above, if for example RD accidentally approves penis -> penisses then we can simply revert everything from her profile page to restore the tags, this makes it simply easier in a worst case scenario.
It may also be that it is done through a job task, if a member would try to access that them the server would throw an error, which would mean they'd always need access to the job task, which is extremely performance hungry if I remember right.

Asphyxia said:
Since some of you are into lists: why not make an "upload flagged for deletion (resulting in actual deletion)" list, or a "member, comment or forum post report" list? The latter would probably create some arguments, nobody wants to be known as a 'traitor'.

First is pretty meh, yes, we often use the given FFD if it is a proper reason, but why would "suggested deletions approved: " be of interest?

First is pretty meh, yes, we often use the given FFD if it is a proper reason, but why would "suggested deletions approved: " be of interest

That was mild sarcasm from my side. The lists as they currently are aren't very representative, Gilda_The_Gryphon exemplified this with the scripts for privileged members.

NotMeNotYou said:
why would "suggested deletions approved: " be of interest?

I'd be moderately interested to see it, but it would be best if it came along with "# of suggested deletions", or "% of suggested deletions approved". It would be interesting to see who is the most consistently accurate with FFD.

Can we get a favorites leader board? That would be interesting

kentonnn said:
Can we get a favorites leader board? That would be interesting

Or Blips.

furballs_dc said:
Or Blips.

Stop creating things that you'd automatically win.
Now about those forum replies...

Query: Could we get tagging changes where you change things multiple times in short succession all be collated into a single instance of tag editting? Sometimes I'll be editting a set of tags, notice it's not there, replace, repeat 1-2 more times, derp as I realize there's an implicating tag and fix it- or realize there's some other tag I didn't add before and add it quickly... then realize another tag, etc.

Would clean up the tag history page quite a bit.

123easy said:
Query: Could we get tagging changes where you change things multiple times in short succession all be collated into a single instance of tag editting? Sometimes I'll be editting a set of tags, notice it's not there, replace, repeat 1-2 more times, derp as I realize there's an implicating tag and fix it- or realize there's some other tag I didn't add before and add it quickly... then realize another tag, etc.

Would clean up the tag history page quite a bit.

This entire thread promotes spamming of everything, I think this old thread should be allowed to sleep locked for awhile.

Conker said:
This entire thread promotes spamming of everything, I think this old thread should be allowed to sleep locked for awhile.

I'll nominate you for the "least fun guy at the party" award.

Moon_Moon said:
I'll nominate you for the "least fun guy at the party" award.

Nah man, the sanctity of porn site edits is important. We should stop having fun with it :o

(in before not a porn site)

Second in notes huh? That's actually pretty creepy.

Moon_Moon said:
I'll nominate you for the "least fun guy at the party" award.

>.>

CamKitty said:
Nah man, the sanctity of porn site edits is important. We should stop having fun with it :o

(in before not a porn site)

Agreed.

slyroon said:
People should see this, It´s like the site's own high-scores

Notes - #1 Slyroon
Top 100

Tags - #1 Rainbow_Dash
Top 100

Wikis - #1 titaniachkt
Top 100

Uploads - #1 Tony311
Top 100

that suet cray cray

who has the most deleted posts cause I have like 7

memeboy said:
who has the most deleted posts cause I have like 7

101

Has to be the Eroboros guy.

https://e621.net/user/show/139518

One does not simply get a negative 300 upload limit.

memeboy said:
who has the most deleted posts cause I have like 7

That title belongs to tony311 https://e621.net/user?order=deleted

Jugofthat said:
Has to be the Eroboros guy.

https://e621.net/user/show/139518

One does not simply get a negative 300 upload limit.

That's nothing
https://e621.net/user/show/72852

memeboy said:
who has the most deleted posts cause I have like 7

honestly it's probably me

ippiki_ookami said:
honestly it's probably me

Nope, 3rd.

slyroon said:
That title belongs to tony311 https://e621.net/user?order=deleted

What's the post with the most tags?

Circeus said:
What's the post with the most tags?

https://e621.net/post/index/1/order:tagcount

furrypickle said:
https://e621.net/post/index/1/order:tagcount

Is that up to date? I heard counts, eg 'arttags' 'charactertags' were generally broken and didn't update properly.

(not that I doubt that first post there being legitimately still the post with the most. It's pretty ridiculous.)

savageorange said:
Is that up to date? I heard counts, eg 'arttags' 'charactertags' were generally broken and didn't update properly.

(not that I doubt that first post there being legitimately still the post with the most. It's pretty ridiculous.)

AFAIK, the sorting/ordering-by-X ones still work. But [tagtype]count:[numberhere] ones are broken and give inconsistent or completely wrong results for months now. And most attempts to use "range syntax" with anything also tends to be broken for months now as well. So half of these aren't currently working, but would be very useful if they were fixed. Something else is teasing my mind, like at least one other search meta tag was broken as well, but I can't remember it off of the top of my head. It's just been too long since I reported it and wrote it all down for someone. And I have gotten out of the habit of using them since so many of the ones I want to use are still busted. Unfortunately.