Okay. These dang genders are too much to keep track of.. So I have decided that from now on, the genders are decided as such

there will be three genders, male, female, and none. and below are the requirements of having such genders. These genders took a bunch of time to figure out, and as such, simplified the process significantly.

I propose to the users of e621 this following cheat sheet to the three gender demographic, as it is the best, and only solution to the growing problem of gender identity.

First we start with males. Males are defined as "having penis", and now as such, it says 'penis', not 'a penis.' I got this from translating some ancient latinish text, so I'm sure of my accuracy on this. Males must contain 2 or more penises, visible at all times. If they do not show at least two, they bump down to the second gender.

Female, or "Not having penis" is a good second step, this gender must have one penis, and not less. This comes from the fact that gender is derived from sexual organs, and if it doesn't have a sexual organ, it must not have a gender, as such, we can assume that only penis counts as sexual organ, and if it doesn't have any penise it must be

Non gendered: this covers anything that is not worthy enough to have said penis, and thus has no gender. These are the final gender, encompassing all things not penises, including anyone wearing clothing, or being looked at from an odd angle. These creatures can fluctuate gender, depending on angle, and can be multiple genders due to the viewer.

This, is my ultimate and true suggestion to the gender issue plaguing our fair site, please take it into consideration.

This is not the best idea, methinks.
What about images such as this one?
post #293757
She is obviously female. She has obvious breasts and a feminine body. Or am I misunderstanding this completely?

Thanks for the laugh, Aurali.

Suineder said:
Thanks for the laugh, Aurali.

...and for a moment I thought they where being serious lol

Aurali said:

Okay. These dang genders are too much to keep track of.. So I have decided that from now on, the genders are decided as such

there will be three genders, male, female, and none. and below are the requirements of having such genders. These genders took a bunch of time to figure out, and as such, simplified the process significantly.

I propose to the users of e621 this following cheat sheet to the three gender demographic, as it is the best, and only solution to the growing problem of gender identity.

First we start with males. Males are defined as "having penis", and now as such, it says 'penis', not 'a penis.' I got this from translating some ancient latinish text, so I'm sure of my accuracy on this. Males must contain 2 or more penises, visible at all times. If they do not show at least two, they bump down to the second gender.

Female, or "Not having penis" is a good second step, this gender must have one penis, and not less. This comes from the fact that gender is derived from sexual organs, and if it doesn't have a sexual organ, it must not have a gender, as such, we can assume that only penis counts as sexual organ, and if it doesn't have any penise it must be

Non gendered: this covers anything that is not worthy enough to have said penis, and thus has no gender. These are the final gender, encompassing all things not penises, including anyone wearing clothing, or being looked at from an odd angle. These creatures can fluctuate gender, depending on angle, and can be multiple genders due to the viewer.

This, is my ultimate and true suggestion to the gender issue plaguing our fair site, please take it into consideration.

I think your trying to troll the users that started that gender tag drama thing in the TWYS update form. But that Non gendered tag can work for post with no identifiable characters to assign a gender to like this post #304549
But if your serious about what you just said.... Why change it so much?

May I also suggest differentiating between "male" and "Male."
male = 2 penises
Male = 3 or more (three's a crowd)

I suggest to go a step further, and reduce every sexual tags to two:
Straight_missionary_position_with_no_weird_fetishes_or_condoms, and sinful_sodomy, and change user levels to (from lowest to highest) sheep, priest, bishop, and pope.

I'm in favor of all of this.

Could also get rid of the gender tags. Solved.

Guys, stahp.

I knew as soon as I read the title that this would be none the bit serious.

JoeX said:
This is not the best idea, methinks.
What about images such as this one?
post #293757
She is obviously female. She has obvious breasts and a feminine body. Or am I misunderstanding this completely?

this user would be classified as "non-gendered" as it has no penises showing.

Conker said:
...and for a moment I thought they where being serious lol

just a modest suggestion to be taken by the administration

Falord said:
But if your serious about what you just said.... Why change it so much?

I'm totally serious. And this proposed rule is an all encompassing gender rule that covers every scenario ever.

Since when did we have an ignorant tagging system? Since when was Aurali like this?

SINCE WHEN WERE APRIL FOOLS JOKES AT THE END OF THE MONTH?!

You know. Weasyl has listed 1069 different genders?

True story.

Aurali said:
You know. Weasyl has listed 1069 different genders?

True story.

Wat

I can't believe anyone is bitching about how many gender classifications there are, when just look at how many music-genre classifications there are, or painting-style classifications! Unless you bitch about those too, in which case okay.

Gender isn't what it used to be anymore. Aurali's proposal makes sense, and if you don't understand why you might want to check your privilege.

rohto said:
Gender isn't what it used to be anymore. Aurali's proposal makes sense, and if you don't understand why you might want to check your privilege.

This is the funniest joke I've heard today, and I'm not sure it's even supposed to be funny.

There's a point where "forward thinking" just becomes impractical.
And pointless. Gender identification shouldn't have to have its own guidebook.

Aeshma said:
This is the funniest joke I've heard today, and I'm not sure it's even supposed to be funny.

There's a point where "forward thinking" just becomes impractical.
And pointless. Gender identification shouldn't have to have its own guidebook.

Gender isn't something pointing straightforward, it's more of a wibbly-wobbly mass of penises.

Aurali said:y
First we start with males. Males are defined as "having penis", and now as such, it says 'penis', not 'a penis.' Males must contain 2 or more penises, visible at all times. If they do not show at least two, they bump down to the second gender.

Female, or "Not having penis", this gender must have one penis, and not less.

Non gendered: These creatures can fluctuate gender aka Gender-Bending, depending on angle, and can be multiple genders due to the viewer.

k

Who are we to differentiate between what should be "male" or "female"?
Can we say with all certainty that just because a character in a picture has a penis that they identify as "male"?
Or if a character has a vagina that they identify as "female"?

Clearly for the sake of accuracy we should simply tag all images as "ambiguous_gender" and be done with it.

I know half of you are serious and half of you are trolling, but keep in mind the point is *supposed* to be for searching: If someone searches 'male', they want to see breastless dicks. Etc. There is no "accuracy".

But how Swiftly can we eat them?

This thread, especially the very suggestion behind it, are so full of wall-bangers that it's become funny twice over.

ALIAS SUGGESTION

* -> invalid_tag

we can see what things are in the image, thank you

Mario583 said:
k

You're support is greatly appreciated

Princess_Celestia said:
This thread, especially the very suggestion behind it, are so full of wall-bangers that it's become funny twice over.

I love you too Renadyne <3

My reaction to this thread

TheHuskyK9 said:
My reaction to this thread

What in the bloody fuck is that show? Did the Internet make that? It's...like liquid trollface poured into a wax cast.

Foobaria said:
What in the bloody fuck is that show? Did the Internet make that? It's...like liquid trollface poured into a wax cast.

ROFL it's called Adventure Time on CN and your reaction was perfect XD

Foobaria said:
I know half of you are serious and half of you are trolling, but keep in mind the point is *supposed* to be for searching: If someone searches 'male', they want to see breastless dicks. Etc. There is no "accuracy".

I thought the image tags was supposed to be whatever one can think of to put in the space to show up in as many spots as possible, so as many people can see it. Or am I thinking of FA again.