Implicating tatzljack → tatzlpony
Link to implication

Reason:

tatzljack is a 'tatzlpony' version of Applejack.

What the hell is a "tatzlpony"?

NotMeNotYou said:
What the hell is a "tatzlpony"?

¯\_(ツ)_/¯

-1 because "character I-> species".

BlueDingo said:
-1 because "character I-> species".

Instead, alias Tazljack -> applejack_(mlp)

Gonna go ahead and nip this in the bud -

I'm not going to humor fanmade nicknames as official tags. Tag them by their official names and their species (tatzlpony) separately.

BlueDingo said:
-1 because "character I-> species".

I'm not so sure about that. Tatzljack is a name specifically for applejack portrayed as a tatzlpony. Now, I'm not convinced that we should have "character portrayed as specific alternate species" tags, but if we do allow them it would make sense for them to be exceptions for the character != species rule.

My inclination is +1 for alias tatzljack → applejack_(mlp), and clean up the other tatz* tags to just tatzlwurm, tatzlpony, and tatzlwyrm (which is distinct from tatzlwurm, one being a monster from Pathfinder and the other being a thing from MLP that was probably given the name as a reference to Pathfinder).

Snowy said:
I'm not so sure about that. Tatzljack is a name specifically for applejack portrayed as a tatzlpony. Now, I'm not convinced that we should have "character portrayed as specific alternate species" tags, but if we do allow them it would make sense for them to be exceptions for the character != species rule.

forum #146296 - Similar situation, different character.

BlueDingo said:
forum #146296 - Similar situation, different character.

Except this is a fan variation on an official character, not an official variation of an official character.

Tazljack looks exactly like Applejack except for the tongues and lightning eyeshadow anyways.

OP implication deleted

All tatzl-nicknames will be aliased to their respective characters as they pop up.