Aliasing gijinka → animal_humanoid
Link to alias

Reason:

Pretty much the same thing; and the gijinka tag wiki itself even says it should probably be aliased away. It also suggests humanized, but ginjinka is more often used by westerners to describe animal humanoids, and not things that have been turned fully human or simply anthroized.

-1
sometimes ginjikas are made based on non animal things, and sometimes ginjikas are humans or just humanoids.

post #104248 post #280185 post #316248 post #355756 post #355758 post #545076
post #616144 post #728002 post #1106449 post #621837 post #621814
and many many more posts. this alias would cause a fuckton of mistags now and in future. If anything, this should be disambiguated.

Ledian said:
-1
sometimes ginjikas are made based on non animal things, and sometimes ginjikas are humans or just humanoids.

post #104248 post #280185 post #316248 post #355756 post #355758 post #545076
post #616144 post #728002 post #1106449 post #621837 post #621814
and many many more posts. this alias would cause a fuckton of mistags now and in future. If anything, this should be disambiguated.

Just alias it to humanoid, then. Humanoid pokemon, humanoid animal, humanoid anything, it's all humanoid.

-1 for reason stated by Ledian. It's hard to alias because sometimes it's humanoid, sometimes it's just human in a costume.

Furrin_Gok said:
Just alias it to humanoid, then. Humanoid pokemon, humanoid animal, humanoid anything, it's all humanoid.

did you read what i said or look at the examples? i said that sometimes ginjikas are humans. you cant alias thing that is sometimes human into humanoid.

Do we need "humans that are part something else" and "humans dressed as something else" under the same tag? It probably should be split between cosplay and humanoid.

The humanized tag should be removed as well. A human dressing up as something is not that something transformed into a human.