Implicating plump_camel_toe → camel_toe
Link to implication

Reason:

Plump camel toe is used to describe a camel toe that is being made by a plump labia. Since plump labia can't be used without implying the pussy tag then plump camel toe will be used to described the same feature when it can't be directly seen. This tag should only ever be used on posts where a camel toe is present.

i dont really think that we need plump camel toe tag

Mutisija said:
i dont really think that we need plump camel toe tag

While a lot of them don't really look like they're deserving of the tag, I'd say it's a good idea for the really plump ones. "Slightly plump" shouldn't be considered though because artists probably do that to make sure viewers actually see it.

post #548868
Not plump at all (The area outside the panties looks more like the pelvic boot)
post #1026467
Slightly plump, shouldn't be tagged
post #442133
Very plump, should be tagged.

This is a debatable idea, of course. Different people have different ideas on what will be very or slightly plump, and if enough people want the slightly plump ones that's something to consider allowing too.

Furrin_Gok said:
While a lot of them don't really look like they're deserving of the tag, I'd say it's a good idea for the really plump ones. "Slightly plump" shouldn't be considered though because artists probably do that to make sure viewers actually see it.

[...]

This is a debatable idea, of course. Different people have different ideas on what will be very or slightly plump, and if enough people want the slightly plump ones that's something to consider allowing too.

There's absolutely no difference between the fatness of the cooches in those images.

Fat cameltoes should be tagged, and searched for, with plump_labia cameltoe

FibS said:
There's absolutely no difference between the fatness of the cooches in those images.

Fat cameltoes should be tagged, and searched for, with plump_labia cameltoe

plump_labia implies pussy, which means you'd be falsely tagging the images.

I'm not the original maker of the plump camel toe tag. I'm simply trying to get it to function properly after I first saw it appear.

I spend a lot of time fixing tags on images, and one of the more common ones I see are camel toe posts being labeled with pussy because someone tried to add in plump labia, which implies the pussy tag. Now most of these posts very well should have the plump labia tag, as it can be easily seen through the clothing, but has to be removed because of its implication of a pussy. So this tag was created by someone as a way to still tag a plump labia while not implying a pussy.

I would also like someway to tag camel toe more descriptively in regards to its size; in similarity to how bulge is implied with the use of hyper bulge.

There is also a possibility that with the growing use of plump camel toe that there will be fewer instances of a camel toe being tagged as a pussy because someone tried to tag the plump labia. With fewer erroneous tags to fix, I can then spend more of my time trying to fix other posts with various other errors.

I created the tag per parasprite's suggestion on forum #155732, the tag has hardly any use. I think the majority the posts was me replacing plump_labia tags with it.

The tag gets a +1 from me, based on the reasons outlined in forum #155732
(creates a conflict with the plump_labia -> pussy implication
-
though I gotta agree in this case about camel_toe plump_labia working as an adequate replacement for the time being to find the posts,

since the constituent tags don't have much overlap with other scenarios
(ie. most stuff tagged whith both camel_toe & plump_labia
are likely to depict characters with plump_camel_toe)
--
In any case, dumped most of the existing posts in a set for now, but haven't tagged anything additional

---
If anyone has examples of exceptions to the above, or wants to be a maintainer of the set, feel free to mention in forum #155732 (or here, but the former is preferred to keep everything in one place relevant to the topics)

Approved

forum #230360