Aliasing fox_on_top → fox_mccloud
Link to alias

Reason:

Too specific. We don't need a tag for one specific character having sex with others.

Is it possible to just delete a tag? Because I support doing that for this one.

Invalidation was my first thought but this tag only applies to images featuring Fox McCloud. Less cleanup this way.

what about the species?

kamimatsu said:
what about the species?

In that case, we'd better make tags for every species.

-1. The tag should just be deleted (or tell the tagger to turn it into a set). If anything it should be aliased to fox.

Strikerman said:
In that case, we'd better make tags for every species.

I meant why do we assume it was fox mcloud versus just a fox.

kamimatsu said:
I meant why do we assume it was fox mcloud versus just a fox.

"A semi-joke tag that designates when the Fox McCloud is on top of another male character, as usually it's Falco or Wolf on top of him."

literally the description

kamimatsu said:
I meant why do we assume it was fox mcloud versus just a fox.

The wiki entry for it specifies Fox McCloud and every image tagged with it so far contains Fox McCloud.

BlueDingo said:
Aliasing fox_on_top → fox_mccloud
Link to alias

Reason:

Too specific. We don't need a tag for one specific character having sex with others.

It's a joke tag. Like the tag "these_arent_my_glasses". Why do you take everything so seriously?

BlackLicorice said:
It's a joke tag. Like the tag "these_arent_my_glasses". Why do you take everything so seriously?

What's the joke?

Strikerman said:
What's the joke?

Says on the wiki page

BlackLicorice said:
It's a joke tag. Like the tag "these_arent_my_glasses". Why do you take everything so seriously?

Because joke tags are meaningless and have no place on e621.

UnusualParadox said:
Because joke tags are meaningless and have no place on e621.

Fair enough.

Never heard of it, doesn't turn up anything on Google. I doubt it'll be used by anyone else, so it'd be easiest to just wipe the tag and wiki entry.