alright, i'm just gonna set these two points here and open it up for some hopefully productive discussion.
1. should cereal mascots be implicated to their respective cereals? many cereals are listed as copyrights (i.e. trix, cookie crisp, frosted flakes) but i think instead it could be argued that these should be general tags to account for their cereals. instead, these mascots could be implicated to the companies the cereals are from (general mills, for instance) which i think would make more sense.
2. should known mascots be implicated to mascot? makes sense to me: no matter what, if anyone posts a pic of tony the tiger, the character will inherently be a mascot.
Updated by O16