Implicating two-footed_footjob → footjob
Link to implication

Reason:

+1. Seems appropriate.

Given the tag's popularity, I am a bit surprised that it hasn't implicated yet.

O16 said:
+1. Seems appropriate.

Given the tag's popularity, I am a bit surprised that it hasn't implicated yet.

That's because before a day or two ago it was never tagged, I've been working on adding it to posts.

Blind_Guardian said:
That's because before a day or two ago it was never tagged, I've been working on adding it to posts.

Ok; but, since you created the tag, why didn't you posted something on the "new tag announcements" forum thread (forum #221775)?
If people don't know about the tag's existence then they hardly will tag it too.

p.s. Wow, you work fast.

A footjob is a footjob, of course of course

I appreciate the distinction. While we're at it, is there a tag for footjobs involving prehensile feet? Should we distinguish footjobs involving only one foot?

(OP approved)

Knotty_Curls said:
A footjob is a footjob, of course of course

I appreciate the distinction. While we're at it, is there a tag for footjobs involving prehensile feet? Should we distinguish footjobs involving only one foot?

I don't think there's a tag for that. I don't think we should distinguish footjobs for one foot but I wouldn't mind if we did, however footjob -two-footed_footjob should show only one foot being used (I haven't gone through animated and male/male posts yet). I thought to mirror it like handjob and two-handed_handjob etc.

Knotty_Curls said:
A footjob is a footjob, of course of course

While we're at it, is there a tag for footjobs involving prehensile feet?

I guess 'footjob + prehensile_feet' suffices.

Knotty_Curls said:
Should we distinguish footjobs involving only one foot?

Probably not, the reason is basically the same already mentioned by Blind Guardian.

Just animated posts left. These are going to take a while.