Implicating human_on_feral → humanoid_on_feral
Link to implication

Reason:

What about an elf on feral? An orc on feral? Doesn't make sense to tag those as human_on_feral unless its actually a human.

Probably makes sense to remove the bestiality and interspecies implications from human_on_feral and move them to humanoid_on_feral.

Humans aren't humanoids though. Humanoid refers exclusively to creatures which are similar to humans but which are not humans. Check out the wiki for human or humanoid to see this. It makes it clear that there is a distinction between the two and they are not used in the same way.

-1

I see no reason to mix these two tags. In fact, people trying to mix human into humanoid is one of my biggest pet peeves. Rule34.xxx is basically fucked in that regard because some dumbo decided all humans were also humanoids and now that it's tagged in it's extremely hard to correct.

Humans = irrelevant to the site. Humanoids = relevant.

Don't mix them up.

I see now that the trend is for humanoid and human to be mutually exclusive for a given character. However, it might be worth re-examining that decision, as it runs counter to the way other species are treated:

• If a character is a cross between a dragon and a canine, we tag both dragon and canine.
• If a character is a human with cat ears, now it is treated as an entirely separate species despite the fact that a significant part of the appearance is based on that of humans. (see cat_humanoid)

Also, looking at a broader definition, it's clear that humans are a type of humanoid: Google dictionary classifies humanoid as "having an appearance or character resembling that of a human". This may be another case where the wiki sees a distinction between tags that most users won't.

asw_xxx said:
I see now that the trend is for humanoid and human to be mutually exclusive for a given character. However, it might be worth re-examining that decision, as it runs counter to the way other species are treated:

• If a character is a cross between a dragon and a canine, we tag both dragon and canine.
• If a character is a human with cat ears, now it is treated as an entirely separate species despite the fact that a significant part of the appearance is based on that of humans. (see cat_humanoid)

Also, looking at a broader definition, it's clear that humans are a type of humanoid: Google dictionary classifies humanoid as "having an appearance or character resembling that of a human". This may be another case where the wiki sees a distinction between tags that most users won't.

Related:

• https://e621.net/forum/show/231944?page=1#post-231962
• https://e621.net/forum/show/216260?page=1#post-216500

The human/non-human double standard is a very widespread one.