Aliasing short_penis → thick_penis
Link to alias

Reason:

According the 'thick_penis' wiki: "A penis is considered thick if it has a big diameter or circumference in relation to its length", hence short penises apparently would be included.

Note: I recently edited the content within the 'thick_penis' wiki, however just added examples, corrected grammatical errors and put some links.

EDIT: The tag alias short_penis -> thick_penis (forum #239402) has been rejected by @Millcore.

I'm not sure if this alias would be flawless. I mean you wouldn't expect that all short penises would be thick as well. For example in the cases with feline_penis, I would have tagged this with short_penis.

post #1291703

In contrast, long_penis -/> thin_penis.

-1. not all short penises are thick

-1. Short penises can be thin, too. Life is cruel like that.

Ledian said:
-1. not all short penises are thick

leomole said:
-1. Short penises can be thin, too. Life is cruel like that.

If a penis is short it fulfill the requirements necessary to be considered "thick"; if it is simultaneously short and thin, then it would just be small.

Short_penis has no wiki page and a low tag count so we can't go off of the tagging model, I believe that it is better to alias it to small_penis instead. It is used to describe length, not width, to call something "short", as not all short entities/beings are "stout".

Nah

TheHuskyK9 said:
Nah

I wonder if this counts as
Making non-constructive or derailing forum posts or comments.

Munkelzahn said:
I wonder if this counts as
Making non-constructive or derailing forum posts or comments.

Nah. It's the final judgement of the alias so it is constructive. A non-constructive post would be like "Hey guys, did you hear about what Justin Beiber did lately?"

TheHuskyK9 said:
Nah. It's the final judgement of the alias so it is constructive. A non-constructive post would be like "Hey guys, did you hear about what Justin Beiber did lately?"

You mean how he accidentally ran over a paparazzo but was helpful and waited with until the ambulance arrived?

Yeah, I guess asking a question like that would count as derailing.

TheHuskyK9 said:
Nah

Ok, but what will we do about this tag? Will we keep it?
Siral Exan's suggestion of aliasing it to 'small_penis' doesn't seems a bad idea at all.

TheHuskyK9 said:
"Hey guys, did you hear about what Justin Beiber did lately?"

Who's Justin Beiber?

O16 said:
Ok, but ehat will we do about this tag? Will we keep it?
Siral Exan's suggestion of aliasing it to 'small_penis' doesn't seems a bad idea at all.

Might as well go with that one.

BlueDingo said:
Who's Justin Beiber?

A pop music singer from North America (I don't remember if from Canada or USA).

Siral_Exan said:
Short_penis has no wiki page and a low tag count so we can't go off of the tagging model, I believe that it is better to alias it to small_penis instead. It is used to describe length, not width, to call something "short", as not all short entities/beings are "stout".

Siral_Exan said:
Short_penis has no wiki page and a low tag count so we can't go off of the tagging model, I believe that it is better to alias it to small_penis instead. It is used to describe length, not width, to call something "short", as not all short entities/beings are "stout".

actually the size tags for penis have been defined in a way as if the penis was a primitive 3d tube or cylinder, meaning size is defined in both width(diameter) and length that are based on proportional relations to other bodyparts or the fullbody it self.

Size defines a area or volume, not a single linear measurement.

A short penis only defines length, as such the diameter could still exceed proportions specified under any of the penis size tags, non the less theyd be worthwhile to keep in narrowing down search farther for specific types.

Ruku said:
actually the size tags for penis have been defined in a way as if the penis was a primitive 3d tube or cylinder, meaning size is defined in both width(diameter) and length that are based on proportional relations to other bodyparts or the fullbody it self.

Size defines a area or volume, not a single linear measurement.

A short penis only defines length, as such the diameter could still exceed proportions specified under any of the penis size tags, non the less theyd be worthwhile to keep in narrowing down search farther for specific types.

I) Actually, for objects that usually are much longer that wider, the size is more related to the lenght (e.g. sticks, ropes, swords, ships).

II) If lenght is reduced, volume and area are reduced as well (supposing the other linear measures are kept unaltered).

Then, which course of action would you be in favor?

The tag alias short_penis -> thick_penis (forum #239402) has been rejected by @Millcore.